Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03654976

Mite Asthma Pediatric Immunotherapy Trial

The trial aims to demonstrate efficacy of the House Dust Mite SLIT-tablet versus placebo as add-on treatment in children and adolescents (5-17 years) with House Dust Mite allergic asthma based on clinically relevant asthma worsening.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

5 year–17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

MHAT, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The trial aims to demonstrate efficacy of the HDM SLIT-tablet versus placebo as add-on treatment in children and adolescents (5-17 years) with HDM allergic asthma based on clinically relevant asthma exacerbations.

Additionally, the trial will investigate if the treatment has an effect on asthma symptoms including nightly awakenings due to asthma, asthma medication use, asthma control, lung function, allergic rhinitis and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

Finally, quality of life (QoL) for subjects and caregivers will be measured.

The trial is a randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-national phase III trial conducted in Europe and North America. The treatment period will be approximately 2 years. Subjects will receive a written asthma action plan.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Written informed consent
  • Male or female of any race/ethnicity aged 5-17 years
  • A female subject of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test and be willing to practise appropriate contraceptive methods
  • A clinical history of HDM allergic asthma
  • Use of low daily dose of ICS plus LABA or medium/high daily dose of ICS with or without LABA for the control of asthma symptoms
  • A clinical history of asthma exacerbations in the past two years
  • One or more of the following within the past 4 weeks prior to randomisation:
  • Daytime asthma symptoms more than twice/week
  • Any nocturnal awakening due to asthma
  • SABA rescue medication needed for treatment of asthma symptoms
  • Any activity limitation due to asthma
  • Lung function measured by FEV1 ≥ 70% of predicted value or according to local requirements
  • Clinical history of HDM AR within the last year prior to randomisation
  • An average TCRS>0 during the baseline period
  • Positive specific IgE (defined as ≥class 2, ≥0.70 kU/l) against D. pteronyssinus and/or D. farinae at screening
  • Positive SPT to D. pteronyssinus and/or D. farinae at screening
  • Subject willing and able to comply with trial protocol

Exclusion criteria

  • Is sensitised and regularly exposed to animal dander, molds, and/or cockroach or other perennial allergen
  • Has experienced a life-threatening asthma attack
  • Within the last month before the randomisation visit (visit 3), has had an occurrence of any clinical deterioration of asthma that resulted in emergency treatment, hospitalisation, or treatment with systemic corticosteroids
  • Within the last 3 months before the randomisation visit (visit 3) while on high dose ICS treatment, has had an occurrence of any clinical deterioration of asthma that resulted in emergency treatment, hospitalisation, or treatment with systemic corticosteroids
  • Any SLIT or SCIT treatment with D. pteronyssinus or D. farinae within the previous 12 months
  • Ongoing treatment with any allergy immunotherapy product
  • Any clinically relevant condition or chronic disease incl. malignancy that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with the trial evaluations or the safety of the subject
  • Has a diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis
  • A relevant history of systemic allergic reactions
  • Ongoing treatment with OCS
  • Treatment with restricted and prohibited concomitant medication
  • Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days/5 half-lives of the drug (which ever longest) prior to screening
  • A history of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to any of the excipients or active substance of the IMP (except D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae) or to any excipient of the rescue medication provided in this trial
  • A business or personal relationship with trial staff or sponsor who is directly involved with the conduct of the trial
  • A history of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Has previously been randomised into this trial, is participating in this trial at another investigational site or is participating or planning to participate in any other clinical trial during the duration of this trial
  • Has a history or current evidence of any condition, treatment, laboratory values out of range or other circumstance that in the opinion of the investigator are clinically relevant and might expose the subject to risk by participating in the trial, confound the results of the trial, or interfere with the subject's participation for the full duration of the trial
  • Has a condition or treatment that increase the risk of the subject developing severe adverse reactions after adrenaline/epinephrine administration
  • Is unable to or will not comply with the use of adrenaline/epinephrine auto-injectors for countries where this is a regulatory requirement

Treatment and study plan

HDM SLIT-tablet

Biological

Sublingual allergy immunotherapy tablet, for daily administration (1 tablet per day)

Other names: Acarizax, Odactra

Placebo

Other

Placebo sublingual tablet, for daily administration (1 tablet per day)

Primary outcomes

  1. Annualized Rate of Clinically Relevant Asthma Exacerbations

    Time frame: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)

    The primary endpoint of the trial was the annualized rate of clinically relevant asthma exacerbations calculated as the number of exacerbations per year per participant during the efficacy evaluation period of 20 months. A clinically relevant asthma exacerbation had to be medically confirmed and was defined as asthma worsening leading to at least 1 of the following criteria:

    • Doubling of ICS dose compared to background treatment
    • Systemic corticosteroids for treatment of asthma symptoms for at least 3 days
    • Emergency room visit due to asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids
    • Hospitalization for more than 12 hours due to asthma, requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids

    The outcome measure (by treatment group) is an adjusted annualized rate of clinically relevant asthma exacerbations.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Days With Nocturnal Awakenings Due to Asthma Requiring SABA Rescue Medication

    Time frame: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)

    The days with nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring SABA rescue medication were entered in an eDiary by the participant/caregiver in a 2-week period every 4 months. The proportion of days with nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring SABA was presented on a range from 0 to 1 (1 indicating that all days in the eDiary period were with nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring SABA rescue medication). The efficacy assessment was based on data collected over the 20 months efficacy assessment period.

    The outcome measure (by treatment group) is an estimated proportion of days with nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring SABA rescue medication.

  2. Proportions of Days With SABA Use

    Time frame: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)

    The days with SABA use were entered in an eDiary by the participant/caregiver in a 2-week period every 4 months. The proportion of days with SABA use was presented on a range from 0 to 1 (1 indicating that all days in the eDiary period were with SABA use). The efficacy assessment was based on data collected over the 20 months efficacy assessment period.

    The outcome measure (by treatment group) is an estimated proportion of days with SABA use.

  3. Percentage Predicted FEV1

    Time frame: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)

    The outcome measure (by treatment) is an average of the percentage predicted FEV1 measured at visits 5 to 11 (every 4 months during the 20 months efficacy assessment period), analyzed using MMRM (mixed-effect model repeated measurement).

    FEV1 (forced expired volume in 1 second) is assessed by use of spirometry and is a measure for lung function. Percentage predicted FEV1 is derived from the predicted FEV1, which is the expected value of FEV1 for a person of a certain age, race, height and gender with healthy lungs.

  4. Global Evaluation of Allergic Asthma as Having an Improved Outcome

    Time frame: Assessment done at the end of trial visit (after 24-30 months of treatment)

    At the end of trial visit, the subject was asked, when compared to their asthma before IMP treatment, how they felt overall. Subjects who answered 'much better' or 'better' were categorized as having improved allergic asthma. At the end of trial visit, subjects had been treated for 24-30 months (including a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period).

    The outcome measure (by treatment) is an adjusted odds of experiencing improved allergic asthma.

  5. Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis as Having an Improved Outcome

    Time frame: Assessment done at the end of trial visit (after 24-30 months of treatment)

    At the end of trial visit, the subject was asked, when compared to their rhinitis before IMP treatment, how they felt overall. Subjects who answered 'much better' or 'better' were categorized as having improved allergic rhinitis. At the end of trial visit, subjects had been treated for 24-30 months (including a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period).

    The outcome measure (by treatment) is an adjusted odds of experiencing improved allergic rhinitis.

Other outcomes

  1. Allergic Rhinitis Symptoms

    Time frame: The efficacy assessment period for the endpoint started 4 months after treatment initiation and lasted until the end of the trial or discontinuation of treatment (up to 24-30 months of treatment).

    Allergic rhinitis symptoms were entered in an eDiary by the participant/caregiver in a 2-week period every 4 months, for up to 24-30 months.

  2. Allergic Rhinitis Medication Use

    Time frame: The efficacy assessment period for the endpoint started 4 months after treatment initiation and lasted until the end of the trial or discontinuation of treatment (up to 24-30 months of treatment).

    Allergic rhinitis medication use were entered in an eDiary by the participant/caregiver in a 2-week period every 4 months, for up to 24-30 months.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

ALK-Abelló A/S

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the House Dust Mite (HDM) Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT)-Tablet in Children and Adolescents (5-17 Years) With HDM Allergic Asthma

Acronym: MAPIT

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Aug 31, 2018
Registry last updated
Oct 19, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.