HDM SLIT-tablet
BiologicalSublingual allergy immunotherapy tablet, for daily administration (1 tablet per day)
Other names: Acarizax, Odactra
NCT Number: NCT03654976
The trial aims to demonstrate efficacy of the House Dust Mite SLIT-tablet versus placebo as add-on treatment in children and adolescents (5-17 years) with House Dust Mite allergic asthma based on clinically relevant asthma worsening.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me5 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
MHAT, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
The trial aims to demonstrate efficacy of the HDM SLIT-tablet versus placebo as add-on treatment in children and adolescents (5-17 years) with HDM allergic asthma based on clinically relevant asthma exacerbations.
Additionally, the trial will investigate if the treatment has an effect on asthma symptoms including nightly awakenings due to asthma, asthma medication use, asthma control, lung function, allergic rhinitis and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
Finally, quality of life (QoL) for subjects and caregivers will be measured.
The trial is a randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-national phase III trial conducted in Europe and North America. The treatment period will be approximately 2 years. Subjects will receive a written asthma action plan.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Sublingual allergy immunotherapy tablet, for daily administration (1 tablet per day)
Other names: Acarizax, Odactra
Placebo sublingual tablet, for daily administration (1 tablet per day)
Time frame: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)
The primary endpoint of the trial was the annualized rate of clinically relevant asthma exacerbations calculated as the number of exacerbations per year per participant during the efficacy evaluation period of 20 months. A clinically relevant asthma exacerbation had to be medically confirmed and was defined as asthma worsening leading to at least 1 of the following criteria:
The outcome measure (by treatment group) is an adjusted annualized rate of clinically relevant asthma exacerbations.
Time frame: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)
The days with nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring SABA rescue medication were entered in an eDiary by the participant/caregiver in a 2-week period every 4 months. The proportion of days with nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring SABA was presented on a range from 0 to 1 (1 indicating that all days in the eDiary period were with nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring SABA rescue medication). The efficacy assessment was based on data collected over the 20 months efficacy assessment period.
The outcome measure (by treatment group) is an estimated proportion of days with nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring SABA rescue medication.
Time frame: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)
The days with SABA use were entered in an eDiary by the participant/caregiver in a 2-week period every 4 months. The proportion of days with SABA use was presented on a range from 0 to 1 (1 indicating that all days in the eDiary period were with SABA use). The efficacy assessment was based on data collected over the 20 months efficacy assessment period.
The outcome measure (by treatment group) is an estimated proportion of days with SABA use.
Time frame: Efficacy assessment period was 20 months (following a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period)
The outcome measure (by treatment) is an average of the percentage predicted FEV1 measured at visits 5 to 11 (every 4 months during the 20 months efficacy assessment period), analyzed using MMRM (mixed-effect model repeated measurement).
FEV1 (forced expired volume in 1 second) is assessed by use of spirometry and is a measure for lung function. Percentage predicted FEV1 is derived from the predicted FEV1, which is the expected value of FEV1 for a person of a certain age, race, height and gender with healthy lungs.
Time frame: Assessment done at the end of trial visit (after 24-30 months of treatment)
At the end of trial visit, the subject was asked, when compared to their asthma before IMP treatment, how they felt overall. Subjects who answered 'much better' or 'better' were categorized as having improved allergic asthma. At the end of trial visit, subjects had been treated for 24-30 months (including a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period).
The outcome measure (by treatment) is an adjusted odds of experiencing improved allergic asthma.
Time frame: Assessment done at the end of trial visit (after 24-30 months of treatment)
At the end of trial visit, the subject was asked, when compared to their rhinitis before IMP treatment, how they felt overall. Subjects who answered 'much better' or 'better' were categorized as having improved allergic rhinitis. At the end of trial visit, subjects had been treated for 24-30 months (including a 4-10 months treatment initiation and maintenance period).
The outcome measure (by treatment) is an adjusted odds of experiencing improved allergic rhinitis.
Time frame: The efficacy assessment period for the endpoint started 4 months after treatment initiation and lasted until the end of the trial or discontinuation of treatment (up to 24-30 months of treatment).
Allergic rhinitis symptoms were entered in an eDiary by the participant/caregiver in a 2-week period every 4 months, for up to 24-30 months.
Time frame: The efficacy assessment period for the endpoint started 4 months after treatment initiation and lasted until the end of the trial or discontinuation of treatment (up to 24-30 months of treatment).
Allergic rhinitis medication use were entered in an eDiary by the participant/caregiver in a 2-week period every 4 months, for up to 24-30 months.
ALK-Abelló A/S
Industry
A Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the House Dust Mite (HDM) Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT)-Tablet in Children and Adolescents (5-17 Years) With HDM Allergic Asthma
Acronym: MAPIT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03746860
Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Farinae, Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus
Montpellier, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07096440
Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Farinae, Allergic Asthma Due to Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus
View Trial DetailsNCT01527188
Allergic Rhinitis Due to House Dust Mite, Hypersensitivity
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04145219
Allergic Rhinitis Due to Dermatophagoides Farinae, Allergic Rhinitis Due to Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus
Huntington Beach, California, United States
View Trial Details