Effect of Membrane Sweeping at Term on Duration of Onset of Labour at Tertiary Care Hospital (EMSTDOLTCH)
NCT07615946
Delayed Onset of Labour, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT02904317
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of the misoprostol vaginal insert (MVI) with an off-label use of oral misoprostol (OM).
Design: Pair-matched case-control study.
Setting: Tertiary-care academic centre in Germany.
Population: A cohort of 138 women ≥ 37/0 weeks pregnant undergoing labour induction.
Methods: The induction of labour with a retrievable prostaglandin vaginal insert in a consecutive series of 69 women was compared with induction using oral misoprostol in a pair-matched cohort.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were the time from induction to delivery and the caesarean section rate. Secondary outcomes included uterine tachysystole, tocolysis, fetal scalp blood testing, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, umbilical arterial pH, and Apgar score.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Observational
Open, non-interventional study in a tertiary referral center in Germany N/A The rationale of our observational study is to describe the efficacy and safety profile of the drug with definition of active labor according to local clinical practice in a descriptive observational study in a tertiary referral center.
A time interval from induction of labor to delivery is depending on the duration of the MISODEL® application. By an observational study the investigators want to describe the efficacy and safety with regard to time to delivery and complication rate.
Primary Objective:
The aim of this study is to describe time to vaginal delivery with definition of active labor according to local clinical practice.
The time period needed to induce any delivery and to describe the drug safety profile.
Primary endpoints:
Misoprostol 200mcg VDS is contraindicated according to the SmPC in the following cases:
For evaluation of the primary and secondary endpoints of the study, descriptive statistical methods will be used.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: September 2015
Time frame: September 2015
Time frame: September 2015
Time frame: September 2015
Time frame: September 2015
Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH
Other
The Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Compared With Oral Misoprostol for Labour Induction in Term Pregnancies: a Pair-matched Case-control Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07615946
Delayed Onset of Labour, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT04514770
Labour Induction
Shibīn al Kawm, Menoufia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT02539199
Labour Induction
Helsinki, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT03016208
Labour Induction
View Trial Details