Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00792129

MIS MiLIF Versus Open

This study is being undertaken to compare the clinical outcomes of patients that have unilateral posterolateral lumbar interbody fusion using a traditional open approach versus the MiLIF procedure based on the MiCOR Precision Bone Allograft, specialized Atavi instrumentation, and minimally invasive visualization capabilities.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

La Jolla Spine Institute, La Jolla, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized cohort design clinical study to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients that have a minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (MiLIF) through the Atavi system compared to traditional unilateral open lumbar interbody fusion through a midline incision. the study will involve up to approximately 12 investigational sites and enroll up to 126 patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is between 18 and 75 years of age
  • Patient is scheduled for an elective spinal lumbar interbody single level fusion
  • Patient is a candidate for posterior unilateral lumbar fusion through a midline incision
  • Indication for surgery and dominant symptom of chronic low back and/or leg pain
  • Diagnosis of one or more of the following:
  • Primary symptomatic degenerative disc disease confirmed with appropriate imaging studies and/or positive lumbar discography
  • Spondylolisthesis Grade I/II
  • The affected motion segment reside in L2-S1 and are adjacent segments
  • Patient, or authorized representative, signs a written Informed Consent form to participate in the study, prior to any study mandated determinations or procedure.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient has a known fracture in the lumbar spine
  • Patient has systemic infection or evidence of any surgical site infection (superficial or organ space)
  • Patient has compromised immune system or autoimmune disease (WBC<4000 or >20,000)
  • Patient has uncontrolled diabetes
  • Patient has a known malignancy
  • Prior lumbar fusion attempt; prior laminectomy and/or discectomy are allowed
  • Known medical or anatomical condition that would preclude a posterior lumbar fusion using metallic instrumentation (e.g., severe osteopenia)
  • Patient with a planned placement of an electric bone stimulator
  • Patient with a planned placement of indwelling epidural catheter for a long term pain management
  • Patient is pregnant or wishes to become pregnant during the length of the study participation
  • Patient is currently in litigation
  • Patient is not likely to comply with the follow-up evaluation schedule
  • Patient is participating in a clinical trial of another investigational drug or device.

Treatment and study plan

The Atavi System

Device

The primary device in the Atavi system is the Flex Posture retractor and accessories such as dilators and an Expander Instrument.

The Atavi System includes instruments used to access the spine by dilation of the overlying tissues, as well as a retracting device that is used to maintain the access. Once the retractor is in place, the visualization components of the system may be used.

Other names: MIS, Minimally invasive, Atavi, Flex Posure, retractor

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Outcomes

    Time frame: MiLIF and Open groups at 3 months post-procedure as defined by the mean Oswestry score

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Outcomes

    Time frame: The percent of patients that have a successful fusion at one year post-procedure as measured by radiographs

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Zimmer Biomet

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multi-Center Study to Evaluate MiLIF(R) Versus Open Posterior Unilateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2006
Study completion
2009
First posted
Nov 17, 2008
Registry last updated
Feb 16, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.