Mipolixin®
Device1.55g chewable tablet 5 times a day for 2 weeks
Other names: Advanced Natural Antacid
NCT Number: NCT03531372
Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of two medical devices, Mipolixin® and Poliprotect®, in improving the overall symptom severity of functional dyspesia and/or heartburn
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
CS Albuñol, Albuñol, Spain
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
o According to the current Rome IV diagnostic criteria, functional dyspepsia is defined as one or more of the following symptoms: postprandial fullness (classified as postprandial distress syndrome), early satiation (inability to finish a normal sized meal, also classified as postprandial distress syndrome), and epigastric pain or burning (classified as epigastric pain syndrome).
Exclusion criteria
Note: Patients will be asked to avoid any drugs of the above mentioned since the beginning of the study (baseline visit) until the end of the study.
1.55g chewable tablet 5 times a day for 2 weeks
Other names: Advanced Natural Antacid
1.55 g chewable tablet 5 times a day for 2 weeks
Other names: Neobianacid
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 14
The primary endpoint is the change in the score of a visual analog scale (VAS) (from "no symptoms" to "overwhelming symptoms") used for evaluating overall symptom severity from baseline (day 0) to day 14 after treatment initiation, between the two study arms. A decrease in VAS score of at least 30% is considered as a clinically meaningful improvement, and therefore subjects achieving a decrease ≥30% in this scale will be considered as responders. The non-inferiority is considered demonstrated if the 95% confidence interval of the difference in the percentage of responders between both study arms lies within the non-inferior margin value defined of 20%.
Time frame: Day 0, Day 3 and Day 7
Percentage of responder patients (VAS score decrease of at least 30%) on the basis of the mean change in the overall symptom severity assessed by the VAS score from baseline to day 3 and day 7 in both study arms
Time frame: Day 0, Day 1, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14
Comparison between Mipolixin® and Poliprotect® in the mean change of the score of the self-assessed severity of individual specific symtoms (bothersome postprandial fullness, bothersome early satiation, bothersome epigastric pain, bothersome epigastric burning, and bothersome heartburn) rated on a 100 mm VAS (from "no symptoms" to "overwhelming symptoms") from baseline to 1 3, 7 and 14 days after treatment initiation.
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 14
Change in the score of GOS ( Global Overall Symptom) scale from baseline to day 14 in both study arms. A decrease in GOS score ≥2 is considered as a clinically meaningful improvement, and therefore subjects achieving a decrease in overall severity score ≥2 from baseline in this scale will be considered as responders.
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 14
Incidence and type of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) reported during study treatment.
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 28
Safety will be assessed on the basis of all AEs experienced during study treatment and all observed and volunteered AEs and abnormal findings on physical examination, including vital signs throughout the study.
Time frame: Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14
Patient level of satisfaction in terms of treatment administration/posology will be assessed by means of specific questions about patient level of satisfaction after the 2-week treatment period. The response will be scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 4, as follows: 1 = "very satisfied", 2 = "quite satisfied", 3 = "somewhat satisfied", 4 = "not satisfied".
Time frame: Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14
Patient level of satisfaction in terms of chewable tablets taste will be assessed by means of specific questions about patient level of satisfaction after the 2-week treatment period. The response will be scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 4, as follows: 1 = "very satisfied", 2 = "quite satisfied", 3 = "somewhat satisfied", 4 = "not satisfied".
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 14
Treatment compliance will be evaluated by performing the IP accountability. This data will be corroborated with the information recorded in the patient diary concerning the daily administered and missed doses.
Aboca Spa Societa' Agricola
Industry
Efficacy and Safety of Mipolixin® Compared to Poliprotect ® in the Relief of Symptoms of Moderate Functional Dyspepsia and Heartburn: A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group,Non-inferiority Clinical Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06094062
Behavior, Dyspepsia
Basel, Canton of Basel-City, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT05131802
Bile Reflux, Biliary Tract Diseases
Zagazig, Sharqia Province, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT01915173
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00243724
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial Details