Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03079024

Minnesota Community-Based Cognitive Training in Early Psychosis

The purpose of this study is to determine whether cognitive training exercises can improve cognitive functioning in young patients with recent-onset psychosis who are being treated in community mental health settings using the NAVIGATE model. The investigators will examine the effects of web-based cognitive training exercises delivered on iPads. Participants will be randomized to one of three conditions, and will be assessed at Baseline, Post-Intervention, and 6 Month Follow Up on measures of clinical, neurocognitive, and functional status.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Minnesota, Dept of Psychiatry

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55116, United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to perform a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) in young patients with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) to target improvement in cognitive functioning within real-world treatment settings. This study will be performed in the University of Minnesota Department of Psychiatry; patients will be recruited from local community based mental health care settings that implement a NAVIGATE model for FEP.

All participants will undergo baseline assessment in measures of clinical, neurocognitive, and functional status prior to randomization. Participants will be equally randomized to one of three groups: Targeted Cognitive Training (TCT); General Cognitive Exercises (GCE); or Treatment as Usual (TAU). Participants assigned to a cognitive training group will be loaned an iPad to complete study training at home. They will complete 60 minutes of training 5 times a week over the course of 6 weeks for a total of 30 hours of training. Participants will be allowed up to 12 weeks to complete the full 30 hours. Participants will return after 30 hours of training or 12 weeks, whichever comes first, for Post-Intervention Assessments. Then participants will enter a no-contact follow up period, until it is time for their 6 Month Follow Up assessment.

Specific Aims:

  • Perform a double-blind RCT of web-based, portable computerized cognitive training in young individuals with recent onset psychosis receiving treatment within the University of Minnesota, Department of Psychiatry's First Episode Psychosis Program or other state clinics utilizing the NAVIGATE treatment model.
  • Compare the clinical and cognitive effects of neural system-informed TCT that focuses explicitly and specifically on distributed neural system efficiency in auditory/verbal and social cognitive domains, vs. more non-specific GCE designed to enhance executive functioning and problem-solving, vs. TAU. Determine the durability of these effects and their relationship to functional outcome over a 6 month period.
  • As a secondary aim, investigate the feasibility, tolerability, and acceptability of the intervention by service providers, clients, and caregivers in these real-world treatment centers.

Hypotheses to be tested:

  • TCT subjects will show significantly greater gains in general cognition, verbal learning/memory, and social cognition compared to GCE and TAU subjects. These gains in the TCT group will be sustained at 6-month follow-up.
  • GCE subjects will show improvement in problem-solving and global cognition compared to TAU subjects. At 6 month follow-up, GCE subjects will show lower gains in global cognition and verbal learning/memory than TCT subjects.
  • Gains in general cognition and processing speed, and in social cognition in TCT subjects will correlate with improvements on 6-month measures of occupational and social functioning, respectively, as well as internalized stigma. These associations will be significantly greater in TCT subjects vs. GCE or TAU subjects.
  • Symptom ratings will show improvement in all subject groups at 6 months, with no significant between-group differences.
  • At least 70% of randomized clients will complete >20 hours of training in the TCT and GCE arms.
  • Participants and clinicians will rate the TCT and GCE interventions as equally feasible, tolerable, and acceptable.

Participants from this study will also be recruited to participate in an adjunct protocol conducted by Dr. Sophia Vinogradov, titled "Is cognitive training neuroprotective in early psychosis?" NCT03049800.

Data from this project will be analysed with a sister protocol conducted by Dr. Rachel Loewy at the University of California San Francisco, titled "Community-Based Cognitive Training in Early Schizophrenia (COTES)," NCT01973270.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, major depressive disorder with psychotic features, bipolar disorder with psychotic features, psychosis disorder not otherwise specified, or unspecified schizophrenia spectrum disorder, and started receiving treatment services at a First Episode Psychosis Program within the last two years
  • Good general physical health
  • Aged between 16 and 35 years (inclusive)
  • Fluent in spoken and written English
  • No neurological disorder (diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder is allowed)
  • Achieved clinical stability, defined as outpatient status for at least one month prior to study participation, stable doses of psychiatric medications for at least one month prior to study participation
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding may participate in this study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Participated in significant cognitive training programs within the last three years
  • Clinically significant substance abuse that is impeding the subject's ability to participate fully during recruitment, assessment, or training (is unable to remain sober for assessments and training).
  • Prescribed >0.5mg daily benztropine (Congentin), >25mg daily diphenhydramine, or high doses of clozapine (>500 mg po qd) or olanzapine (to be determined on a case by case basis).
  • Active suicidal ideation at screening or baseline, or previous intent to act on suicidal ideation with a specific plan, preparatory acts, or an actual suicide attempt within the last 6 months, as indicated by the C-SSRS

Treatment and study plan

Targeted Cognitive Training

Device
  • Auditory Training Module (20 hours): exercises designed to improve speed and accuracy of auditory processing while engaging working memory and cognitive control. Exercises adjust difficulty level to maintain an ~80% correct performance. Exercises contain stimuli spanning the acoustic organization of speech. In the initial stages, stimuli exaggerate the rapid temporal transitions by increasing amplitude and stretching in time. The exaggeration is gradually removed so that by the end, all stimuli have characteristics representative of real-world speech.
  • Social Cognition Module (10 hours): exercises designed to improve core deficits of social cognition in psychosis. Exercises apply principles of implicit learning to restore capacity to process and utilize socially-relevant information, and includes training to improve perception of affect (visual/vocal) and social cues (faces, gazes, social situations), theory of mind, self-referential style, emotion labeling and working memory.

General Cognitive Exercises

Device

The GCE will focus on executive dysfunction, as this domain is a significant, functionally important area of deficit in schizophrenia and has been the target of many previous studies. We will train this domain using a suite of engaging, adaptive web-based exercises that target executive function, intelligence, and spatial navigation developed by Posit Science. The exercises will be provide engaging, adaptive training as described in the Targeted Cognitive Training.

Coordinated Specialty Care for First Episode Psychosis

Other

Individuals in this study are receiving care from a coordinated specialty care clinic (CSC) for first episode psychosis. These clinics are following the NAVIGATE treatment model for early psychosis.

Primary outcomes

  1. Speed of Processing From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: baseline

    A composite T-score of:

    • Symbol Coding from the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS): Symbol Coding. Timed paper-and-pencil test in which respondent uses a key to write digits that correspond to nonsense symbols.
    • Category Fluency: Animal Naming: Oral test in which respondent names as many animals as she/he can in 1 minute.
    • Trail Making Test: Part A: Timed paper-and-pencil test in which respondent draws a line to connect consecutively numbered circles placed irregularly on a sheet of paper. The composite T-score is the average T-score across the 3 measures. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T- score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of

    10.

  2. Speed of Processing From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    A composite T-score of:

    • Symbol Coding from the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS): Symbol Coding. Timed paper-and-pencil test in which respondent uses a key to write digits that correspond to nonsense symbols.
    • Category Fluency: Animal Naming: Oral test in which respondent names as many animals as she/he can in 1 minute.
    • Trail Making Test: Part A: Timed paper-and-pencil test in which respondent draws a line to connect consecutively numbered circles placed irregularly on a sheet of paper. The composite T-score is the average T-score across the 3 measures. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T- score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of

    10.

  3. Speed of Processing From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    A composite T-score of:

    • Symbol Coding from the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS): Symbol Coding. Timed paper-and-pencil test in which respondent uses a key to write digits that correspond to nonsense symbols.
    • Category Fluency: Animal Naming: Oral test in which respondent names as many animals as she/he can in 1 minute.
    • Trail Making Test: Part A: Timed paper-and-pencil test in which respondent draws a line to connect consecutively numbered circles placed irregularly on a sheet of paper. The composite T-score is the average T-score across the 3 measures. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T- score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of

    10.

  4. Attention From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: baseline

    Continuous Performance Test-Identical Pairs (CPT-IP): A computer- administered measure of sustained attention in which respondent presses a response button to consecutive matching numbers. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  5. Attention From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Continuous Performance Test-Identical Pairs (CPT-IP): A computer- administered measure of sustained attention in which respondent presses a response button to consecutive matching numbers. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  6. Attention From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Continuous Performance Test-Identical Pairs (CPT-IP): A computer- administered measure of sustained attention in which respondent presses a response button to consecutive matching numbers. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  7. Working Memory From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: Basline

    Verbal and Visual Working Memory: A composite score of the Letter- Number Span test and the Spatial Span test from the Wechsler Memory Scale®-3rd Ed. (WMS®-III). Letter-Number Span: An orally administered test in which respondent mentally reorders strings of number and letters and repeats them to administrator. Spatial Span: Using a board on which 10 cubes are irregularly spaced, respondent taps cubes in same (or reverse) sequence as test administrator. The composite T-score is the average T-score across the 2 measures. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  8. Working Memory From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Verbal and Visual Working Memory: A composite score of the Letter- Number Span test and the Spatial Span test from the Wechsler Memory Scale®-3rd Ed. (WMS®-III). Letter-Number Span: An orally administered test in which respondent mentally reorders strings of number and letters and repeats them to administrator. Spatial Span: Using a board on which 10 cubes are irregularly spaced, respondent taps cubes in same (or reverse) sequence as test administrator. The composite T-score is the average T-score across the 2 measures. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  9. Working Memory From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Verbal and Visual Working Memory: A composite score of the Letter- Number Span test and the Spatial Span test from the Wechsler Memory Scale®-3rd Ed. (WMS®-III). Letter-Number Span: An orally administered test in which respondent mentally reorders strings of number and letters and repeats them to administrator. Spatial Span: Using a board on which 10 cubes are irregularly spaced, respondent taps cubes in same (or reverse) sequence as test administrator. The composite T-score is the average T-score across the 2 measures. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  10. Verbal Learning From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R): An orally

    administered test in which a list of 12 words from three taxonomic categories is presented and the respondent is asked to recall as many as possible after each of three learning trials. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  11. Verbal Learning From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R): An orally

    administered test in which a list of 12 words from three taxonomic categories is presented and the respondent is asked to recall as many as possible after each of three learning trials. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  12. Verbal Learning From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R): An orally

    administered test in which a list of 12 words from three taxonomic categories is presented and the respondent is asked to recall as many as possible after each of three learning trials. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  13. Visual Learning From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: baseline

    Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-RTM): A test that involves reproducing six geometric figures from memory. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  14. Visual Learning From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-RTM): A test that involves reproducing six geometric figures from memory. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  15. Visual Learning From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-RTM): A test that involves reproducing six geometric figures from memory. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  16. Problem Solving From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: baseline

    Neuropsychological Assessment Battery® (NAB®): Mazes: Seven timed paper-and-pencil mazes of increasing difficulty that measure foresight and planning. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  17. Problem Solving From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Neuropsychological Assessment Battery® (NAB®): Mazes: Seven timed paper-and-pencil mazes of increasing difficulty that measure foresight and planning. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  18. Problem Solving From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Neuropsychological Assessment Battery® (NAB®): Mazes: Seven timed paper-and-pencil mazes of increasing difficulty that measure foresight and planning. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  19. Social Cognition From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: baseline

    Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test(MSCEIT™ ): Managing Emotions: Paper-and-pencil multiple-choice test that assesses how people manage their emotions. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  20. Social Cognition From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test(MSCEIT™ ): Managing Emotions: Paper-and-pencil multiple-choice test that assesses how people manage their emotions. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  21. Social Cognition From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test(MSCEIT™ ): Managing Emotions: Paper-and-pencil multiple-choice test that assesses how people manage their emotions. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  22. Global Cognition From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: baseline

    A composite score of the 7 scores listed above: Speed of Processing, Attention, Working Memory, Verbal Learning, Visual Learning, Problem Solving, and Social Cognition. The composite T-score is the average T-score across the 7 measures. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  23. Global Cognition From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    A composite score of the 7 scores listed above: Speed of Processing, Attention, Working Memory, Verbal Learning, Visual Learning, Problem Solving, and Social Cognition. The composite T-score is the average T-score across the 7 measures. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  24. Global Cognition From the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    A composite score of the 7 scores listed above: Speed of Processing, Attention, Working Memory, Verbal Learning, Visual Learning, Problem Solving, and Social Cognition. The composite T-score is the average T-score across the 7 measures. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  25. Emotion Recognition From the University of Pennsylvania Computerized Neurobehavioral Test Battery

    Time frame: baseline

    Emotion Recognition: Participants are shown a series of 40 faces, one at a time, and asked to determine what emotion the face is showing for each trial. There are 5 answer choices: happy, sad, anger, fear and no emotion. Scores (i.e. correct responses) range from 0-40 with higher scores corresponding to better performance.

  26. Emotional Prosody Identification From the University of Pennsylvania Computerized Neurobehavioral Test Battery Neurobehavioral Test Battery

    Time frame: Baseline

    Emotional Prosody Identification: Participants are presented a series of 80 audio clips played one at a time, and asked to determine what emotion the audio clip portrayed. There are 5 answer choices: Happy, Sad, Anger, Fearful and No Emotion. Scores (i.e. correct responses) range from 0-80 with higher scores corresponding to better performance.

  27. Emotional Prosody Identification From the University of Pennsylvania Computerized Neurobehavioral Test Battery

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Emotional Prosody Identification: Participants are presented a series of 80 audio clips played one at a time, and asked to determine what emotion the audio clip portrayed. There are 5 answer choices: Happy, Sad, Anger, Fearful and No Emotion. Scores (i.e. correct responses) range from 0-80 with higher scores corresponding to better performance.

  28. Emotion Recognition From the University of Pennsylvania Computerized Neurobehavioral Test Battery

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Emotion Recognition: Participants are shown a series of 40 faces, one at a time, and asked to determine what emotion the face is showing for each trial. There are 5 answer choices: happy, sad, anger, fear and no emotion. Scores (i.e. correct responses) range from 0-40 with higher scores corresponding to better performance.

  29. Emotion Recognition From the University of Pennsylvania Computerized Neurobehavioral Test Battery

    Time frame: 6 months

    Emotion Recognition: Participants are shown a series of 40 faces, one at a time, and asked to determine what emotion the face is showing for each trial. There are 5 answer choices: happy, sad, anger, fear and no emotion. Scores (i.e. correct responses) range from 0-40 with higher scores corresponding to better performance.

  30. Emotional Prosody Identification From the University of Pennsylvania Computerized Neurobehavioral Test Battery

    Time frame: 6 months

    Emotional Prosody Identification: Participants are presented a series of 80 audio clips played one at a time, and asked to determine what emotion the audio clip portrayed. There are 5 answer choices: Happy, Sad, Anger, Fearful and No Emotion. Scores (i.e. correct responses) range from 0-80 with higher scores corresponding to better performance.

  31. Faux Pas Test Theory of Mind

    Time frame: Baseline

    Faux Pas Test: Brief stories are read to the participant, and the participant is asked if someone in the story made a faux pas. This test assesses the ability to infer other peoples' mental states, thoughts and feelings. Scores (i.e. percent correct) range from 0-100% with higher scores corresponding to better performance.

  32. Faux Pas Test Theory of Mind

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Faux Pas Test: Brief stories are read to the participant, and the participant is asked if someone in the story made a faux pas. This test assesses the ability to infer other peoples' mental states, thoughts and feelings. Scores (i.e. percent correct) range from 0-100% with higher scores corresponding to better performance.

  33. Faux Pas Test Theory of Mind

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Faux Pas Test: Brief stories are read to the participant, and the participant is asked if someone in the story made a faux pas. This test assesses the ability to infer other peoples' mental states, thoughts and feelings. Scores (i.e. percent correct) range from 0-100% with higher scores corresponding to better performance.

  34. Quality of Life Scale-Abbreviated (Functioning)

    Time frame: baseline

    Functioning: This measure assesses quality of life using subjective questions regarding life satisfaction and objective indicators of social and occupational functioning. Participants are asked questions about social and occupational functioning and intrapsychic foundations (e.g. motivation, sense of purpose, curiosity). The assessor provides ratings on a scale of 0-6 (e.g. absent to adequate). A mean item score is computed as the average rating across all items, with higher mean item scores corresponding to better functioning.

  35. Quality of Life Scale-Abbreviated (Functioning)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Functioning: This measure assesses quality of life using subjective questions regarding life satisfaction and objective indicators of social and occupational functioning. Participants are asked questions about social and occupational functioning and intrapsychic foundations (e.g. motivation, sense of purpose, curiosity). The assessor provides ratings on a scale of 0-6 (e.g. absent to adequate). A mean item score is computed as the average rating across all items, with higher mean item scores corresponding to better functioning.

  36. Quality of Life Scale-Abbreviated (Functioning)

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Functioning: This measure assesses quality of life using subjective questions regarding life satisfaction and objective indicators of social and occupational functioning. Participants are asked questions about social and occupational functioning and intrapsychic foundations (e.g. motivation, sense of purpose, curiosity). The assessor provides ratings on a scale of 0-6 (e.g. absent to adequate). A mean item score is computed as the average rating across all items, with higher mean item scores corresponding to better functioning.

  37. Auditory Processing Speed From the Posit Science Sound Sweeps Assessment

    Time frame: Baseline

    Auditory Processing Speed: In Sound Sweeps, participants listen to frequency sweeps-sounds that begin low and rise upward or begin high and fall downward-and identify whether they go up ("weep") or down ("woop"). The sweeps become progressively faster and are separated by shorter interstimulus intervals. The outcome is the threshold reached by the participant which is the fastest interstimulus interval (in milliseconds) at which the participant correctly performed. Scores ranged from 24-1000 milliseconds with lower scores indicating better performance.

  38. Auditory Processing Speed From the Posit Science Sound Sweeps Assessment

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Auditory Processing Speed: In Sound Sweeps, participants listen to frequency sweeps-sounds that begin low and rise upward or begin high and fall downward-and identify whether they go up ("weep") or down ("woop"). The sweeps become progressively faster and are separated by shorter interstimulus intervals. The outcome is the threshold reached by the participant which is the fastest interstimulus interval (in milliseconds) at which the participant correctly performed. Scores ranged from 24-1000 milliseconds with lower scores indicating better performance.

  39. Auditory Processing Speed From the Posit Science Sound Sweeps Assessment

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Auditory Processing Speed: In Sound Sweeps, participants listen to frequency sweeps-sounds that begin low and rise upward or begin high and fall downward-and identify whether they go up ("weep") or down ("woop"). The sweeps become progressively faster and are separated by shorter interstimulus intervals. The outcome is the threshold reached by the participant which is the fastest interstimulus interval (in milliseconds) at which the participant correctly performed. Scores ranged from 24-1000 milliseconds with lower scores indicating better performance.

  40. Temporal Experience of Pleasures (TEPS):Reward Sensitivity--Anticipatory Pleasure

    Time frame: Baseline

    Reward Sensitivity--Anticipatory Pleasure: This measure assesses pleasure experienced in anticipation of something and consists of 10 items. An example item is: "When something exciting is coming up in my life, I really look forward to it." Participants rate how true the statement is for them on a scale of 1 (very false for me) to 6 (very true for me). A mean item score is computed as the average rating across all items, with higher mean item scores corresponding to greater anticipatory pleasure.

  41. Temporal Experience of Pleasures (TEPS):Reward Sensitivity--Anticipatory Pleasure

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Reward Sensitivity--Anticipatory Pleasure: This measure assesses pleasure experienced in anticipation of something and consists of 10 items. An example item is: "When something exciting is coming up in my life, I really look forward to it." Participants rate how true the statement is for them on a scale of 1 (very false for me) to 6 (very true for me). A mean item score is computed as the average rating across all items, with higher mean item scores corresponding to greater anticipatory pleasure.

  42. Temporal Experience of Pleasures (TEPS):Reward Sensitivity--Anticipatory Pleasure

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Reward Sensitivity--Anticipatory Pleasure: This measure assesses pleasure experienced in anticipation of something and consists of 10 items. An example item is: "When something exciting is coming up in my life, I really look forward to it." Participants rate how true the statement is for them on a scale of 1 (very false for me) to 6 (very true for me). A mean item score is computed as the average rating across all items, with higher mean item scores corresponding to greater anticipatory pleasure.

  43. Temporal Experience of Pleasures (TEPS): Reward Sensitivity--Consummatory Pleasure

    Time frame: Baseline

    Reward Sensitivity--Consummatory Pleasure: This measure assesses pleasure experienced in the moment and consists of 8 items. An example item is: "The smell of freshly cut grass is enjoyable to me." Participants rate how true the statement is for them on a scale of 1 (very false for me) to 6 (very true for me). A mean item score is computed as the average rating across all items, with higher mean item scores corresponding to greater consummatory pleasure.

  44. Temporal Experience of Pleasures (TEPS): Reward Sensitivity--Consummatory Pleasure

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Reward Sensitivity--Consummatory Pleasure: This measure assesses pleasure experienced in the moment and consists of 8 items. An example item is: "The smell of freshly cut grass is enjoyable to me." Participants rate how true the statement is for them on a scale of 1 (very false for me) to 6 (very true for me). A mean item score is computed as the average rating across all items, with higher mean item scores corresponding to greater consummatory pleasure.

  45. Temporal Experience of Pleasures (TEPS): Reward Sensitivity--Consummatory Pleasure

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Reward Sensitivity--Consummatory Pleasure: This measure assesses pleasure experienced in the moment and consists of 8 items. An example item is: "The smell of freshly cut grass is enjoyable to me." Participants rate how true the statement is for them on a scale of 1 (very false for me) to 6 (very true for me). A mean item score is computed as the average rating across all items, with higher mean item scores corresponding to greater consummatory pleasure.

  46. Verbal Memory: Delayed Recall From the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Version (HVLT-R)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Verbal Memory: Delayed Recall: An orally administered test in which a list of 12 words from three taxonomic categories is presented and the respondent is asked to recall as many as possible after a 25 minute delay. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  47. Verbal Memory: Delayed Recall From the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Version (HVLT-R)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Verbal Memory: Delayed Recall: An orally administered test in which a list of 12 words from three taxonomic categories is presented and the respondent is asked to recall as many as possible after a 25 minute delay. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  48. Verbal Memory: Delayed Recall From the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Version (HVLT-R)

    Time frame: 6months followup

    Verbal Memory: Delayed Recall: An orally administered test in which a list of 12 words from three taxonomic categories is presented and the respondent is asked to recall as many as possible after a 25 minute delay. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  49. Visual Memory: Delayed Recall From the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Version (BVMT-R)

    Time frame: baseline

    Visual Memory: Delayed Recall: A test that involves reproducing six geometric

    figures from memory after a 25 minute delay. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  50. Visual Memory: Delayed Recall From the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Version (BVMT-R)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Visual Memory: Delayed Recall: A test that involves reproducing six geometric

    figures from memory after a 25 minute delay. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

  51. Visual Memory: Delayed Recall From the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Version (BVMT-R)

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Visual Memory: Delayed Recall: A test that involves reproducing six geometric

    figures from memory after a 25 minute delay. T-scores range from 0-100, with higher T-scores corresponding to better performance. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean (average) with a standard deviation of 10.

Secondary outcomes

  1. UCSF Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA): Functional Capacity

    Time frame: Baseline

    Functional Capacity: This measure assesses how well everyday tasks are performed in two areas of functioning: communication (e.g. making an emergency call, calling a doctor to reschedule an appointment) and finances (e.g. counting change, reading a utility bill). Scaled scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.

  2. UCSF Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA): Functional Capacity

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Functional Capacity: This measure assesses how well everyday tasks are performed in two areas of functioning: communication (e.g. making an emergency call, calling a doctor to reschedule an appointment) and finances (e.g. counting change, reading a utility bill). Scaled scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.

  3. UCSF Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA): Functional Capacity

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Functional Capacity: This measure assesses how well everyday tasks are performed in two areas of functioning: communication (e.g. making an emergency call, calling a doctor to reschedule an appointment) and finances (e.g. counting change, reading a utility bill). Scaled scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.

  4. Social Functioning Scale

    Time frame: Baseline

    Social Functioning: This measure assesses social skills and functioning in 7 domains: Withdrawal, Interaction, Pro-Social, Recreation, Independence- Performance, Independence-Competence, and Occupational. A mean domain score was calculated as the average across all domains. Scaled scores range from 55-145 with higher scores indicating better functioning.

  5. Social Functioning Scale

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Social Functioning: This measure assesses social skills and functioning in 7 domains: Withdrawal, Interaction, Pro-Social, Recreation, Independence- Performance, Independence-Competence, and Occupational. A mean domain score was calculated as the average across all domains. Scaled scores range from 55-145 with higher scores indicating better functioning.

  6. Social Functioning Scale

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    Social Functioning: This measure assesses social skills and functioning in 7 domains: Withdrawal, Interaction, Pro-Social, Recreation, Independence- Performance, Independence-Competence, and Occupational. A mean domain score was calculated as the average across all domains. Scaled scores range from 55-145 with higher scores indicating better functioning.

  7. Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI)

    Time frame: Baseline

    This measure assesses internalized stigma which occurs when a person adopts stigmatizing assumptions and stereotypes about mental illness. Participants rate 10 statements on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). A mean item score is computed as the average rating across all items, with higher mean item scores corresponding to greater internalized stigma.

  8. Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    This measure assesses internalized stigma which occurs when a person adopts stigmatizing assumptions and stereotypes about mental illness. Participants rate 10 statements on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). A mean item score is computed as the average rating across all items, with higher mean item scores corresponding to greater internalized stigma.

  9. Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI)

    Time frame: 6 months followup

    This measure assesses internalized stigma which occurs when a person adopts stigmatizing assumptions and stereotypes about mental illness. Participants rate 10 statements on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). A mean item score is computed as the average rating across all items, with higher mean item scores corresponding to greater internalized stigma.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota

Other

Collaborators

  • University of California, San Francisco

Registry information

Acronym: Mini-COTES

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Mar 14, 2017
Registry last updated
Jan 23, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.