Faculty of medicine, Assiut University
Asyut, 71515, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06255314
1. Review the surgical outcome of different techniques using extraperitoneal ventral hernia repair regarding postoperative pain. wound infection ,hospital stay , recurrence ,mesh migration and mesh induced visceral complications. 2. Reviewing advantages and drawbacks of each surgical technique regarding feasibility ,cost effectiveness and technical difficulties
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Asyut, 71515, Egypt
The laparoscopic ventral hernia repair was first introduced by LeBlanc and Booth in the early 1990s . Since its introduction, it has continued to evolve and has become an important option in the hernia surgeon's armamentarium. However, only 27.4% of ventral hernia repairs are performed laparoscopically, likely because of the relatively advanced nature of this procedure and because all hernias may not be suitable for a laparoscopic approach. Using current techniques, numerous studies have documented the safety and efficacy of this approach. Some data suggest that the laparoscopic approach results in a shorter hospital stay and lower recurrence rates compared with open approaches. However, pain may still be significant after laparoscopic repairs and there are not significant advantages from this standpoint. Nonetheless, it is well accepted that the primary advantage of the laparoscopic approach is that wound infections are less frequent compared with open approaches .LeBlanc and Booth in 1993 first reported application of intra-peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) for ventral and incisional hernia, However the technique requires expensive fixation devices which may cause acute and chronic pain .The laparoscopic groin hernia repair using synthetic mesh in TEP or TAPP are acceptable surgical techniques today These techniques are rarely associated with mesh induced complications, the reason being extraperitoneal placement of synthetic mesh. It is apparent that despite great progress in mesh technology, nearly all types of meshes have been found to produce a varying level of adhesion or tissue reaction, regardless of the material and coating used. Preoperatively unpredictable, a mesh-induced visceral complication may occur in some patients to produce severe reaction or major mesh-related adverse events.The incitation to develop certain novel minimally invasive techniques that enables researchers to bring the mesh out of abdominal cavity has been an exciting trend in laparoscopic hernia repair.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Laparoscopic transabdominal retromuscular repair is a minimally invasive approach to the open Rives Stoppa retromuscular sublay repair for ventral hernia.
In ventral hernia repair, it relies on initiation of dissection in one retrorectus space and then crossover to the contralateral retrorectus space The sublay mesh technique is an open surgical procedure for ventral and incisional hernias
Time frame: from inflation of abdomen till deflation in laparoscopic repair and from skin incision up to skin closure in open repair.
Time frame: intra operative
Time frame: postoperative up to 1month
Time frame: : 30 days
Time frame: : 1year
Time frame: : 6months
cost of polyprolene mesh compared to composite mesh by egyptian pound
Time frame: 1 year
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
mohamed badr
CONTACT
samir ammar, MD
CONTACT
Assiut University
Other
Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Ventral Hernioplasty With Extraperitoneal Mesh Placement
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07725718
Abdominal Wall Defect, Hernia
Minya, Minya Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07720154
Abdominal Hernia, Complex Ventral Hernia
Minya, Minya Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07267494
Diastasis Recti, Hernia
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07163026
Hernia, Hernia, Abdominal
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details