Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04575935

Minimally Invasive Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Stage IIIC-IV Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer, LANCE Trial

This phase III trial compares minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to laparotomy in treating patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer who are receiving chemotherapy before and after surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy). MIS is a surgical procedure that uses small incision(s) and is intended to produce minimal blood loss and pain for the patient. Laparotomy is a surgical procedure which allows the doctors to remove some or all of the tumor and check if the disease has spread to other organs in the body. MIS may work the same or better than standard laparotomy after chemotherapy in prolonging the return of the disease and/or improving quality of life after surgery.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Arthur J.E. Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre - Calgary, Calgary, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To examine whether MIS is non-inferior to laparotomy in terms of disease free survival (DFS) in women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) that received 3 to 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine if there are differences in health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in patients undergoing MIS versus (vs) laparotomy as assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), QLQ-Ovarian Cancer Module (OV28), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G7).

II. To determine if there are differences between patients undergoing MIS vs laparotomy in the rate of optimal cytoreduction (defined as residual tumor nodules each measuring 1 cm or less in maximum diameter) and complete cytoreduction (defined as no evidence of macroscopic disease).

III. To examine whether MIS is non-inferior to laparotomy in terms of overall survival (OS) in women with advanced stage EOC that received 3 to 4 cycles of NACT.

IV. To determine if there are differences between patients undergoing MIS vs laparotomy in surgical morbidity and mortality, intraoperative injuries, and post-operative complications.

V. To determine the rates of MIS converted to laparotomy and the reasons.

VI. To determine if there are any difference in costs and cost-effectiveness between patients undergoing MIS vs laparotomy.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM A: Patients undergo MIS within 6 weeks after last cycle of standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If during MIS the surgeon thinks complete gross resection can only be accomplished by performing an open procedure, patients may undergo laparotomy instead. Within 6 weeks after surgery, patients receive standard of care chemotherapy.

ARM B: Patients undergo laparotomy within 6 weeks after last cycle of standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Within 6 weeks after surgery, patients receive standard of care chemotherapy.

After completion of study, patients are followed up within 6 weeks of completing post-surgery chemotherapy, then every 3 months for the first 2 years, and then every 6 months for 3 years.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Stage IIIC or IV, high-grade (serous, endometrioid, clear-cell, transitional carcinomas), invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma, primary peritoneal carcinoma, or fallopian-tube carcinoma or pathology consistent with high-grade mullerian carcinoma.
  • Patient is considered by treating physician to be a surgical candidate after completion of 3 to 4 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, or an investigational neoadjuvant regimen given according to protocol, with complete radiologic resolution of any disease outside the abdominal cavity. Pleural effusions are acceptable per the local PI's discretion.
  • Normalization of CA-125 according to individual participating center reference range (Note: Among patients with a normal CA-125 at initiation of therapy, the CA-125 cannot exceed 35 U/mL at the completion of NACT prior to interval debulking surgery.) or has a CA-125 value ≤500 and is scheduled to undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy prior to debulking surgery. a. For patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy, surgeon considers that optimal debulking is feasible either by MIS or laparotomy.
  • Timeframe of < 6 weeks (42 days) from the last cycle of NACT to interval debulking surgery. Overall timeframe may be extended per MD Anderson PI discretion.
  • ECOG performance status 0-2
  • Signed informed consent and ability to comply with follow-up
  • Negative pregnancy test by blood or urine (within 14 days prior to surgery)
  • Disease free of other active malignancies in the previous five years, except basal and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin

Exclusion criteria

  • Evidence of tumor not amenable to minimally invasive resection on pre-operative imaging (CT, PET-CT, or MRI) including but not limited to the following findings that may preclude minimally invasive resection per surgeon's assessment. • Failure of improvement of ascites during NACT (trace ascites is allowed) • Small bowel or gastric tumor involvement • Colon or rectal tumor involvement • Diaphragmatic tumor involvement • Splenic or hepatic surface or parenchymal tumor involvement • Mesenteric tumor involvement • Tumor infiltration of the lesser peritoneal sac
  • History of psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially preventing compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule
  • Inability to tolerate prolonged Trendelenburg position or pneumoperitoneum as deemed by participating institution's clinicians
  • Any other contraindication to MIS as assessed by the clinician

Treatment and study plan

Chemotherapy

Drug

Receive standard of care chemotherapy

Other names: Chemo, Chemotherapy (NOS), Chemotherapy, Cancer, General

Laparotomy

Procedure

Undergo laparotomy

Minimally Invasive Surgery

Procedure

Undergo MIS

Other names: Minimally-Invasive Surgery

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Other

Ancillary studies

Other names: Quality of Life Assessment

Questionnaire Administration

Other

Ancillary studies

Primary outcomes

  1. Disease free survival (DFS)

    Time frame: Between randomization and physical or radiographic evidence of recurrence (local/distant) or death (all causes), assessed up to 5 years

    Kaplan Meier curves will be used to describe DFS over time. Log-rank test will be used to compare DFS between the control and experimental arms. The treatment effects will be summarized by means of a hazard ratio with its associated 95% confidence interval. Two years DFS rate will be computed with a targeted 95% confidence interval (CI).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health related-quality of life (HR-QoL)

    Time frame: Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy

    HR-QoL of patients will be assessed with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC Scale 1-Not at all, 2-A little bit, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Very Much)

  2. Health related-quality of life (HR-QoL)

    Time frame: Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy

    HR-QoL of patients will be assessed Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQC30 scale 1-Not at all, 2-A little bit, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Very Much)

  3. Health related-quality of life (HR-QoL)

    Time frame: Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy

    HR-QoL of patients will be assessed with QLQ-Ovarian Cancer Module (OV28 Scale 1- Not at all, 2- A little bit, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Very Much).) (ovarian supplement)

  4. Health related-quality of life (HR-QoL)

    Time frame: Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy

    HR-QoL of patients will be assessed with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General short-form (FACT-G7 Scale 1- Not at all, 2- A little bit, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Very Much).

  5. Optimal cytoreduction

    Time frame: At the end of surgery

    Defined as residual tumor nodules each measuring 1 cm or less in maximum diameter.

  6. Complete cytoreduction

    Time frame: At the end of surgery

    Defined as no evidence of macroscopic disease.

  7. Overall survival (OS)

    Time frame: Between randomization and death (all causes), assessed up to 5 years

    Overall survival will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and will be described using the median with its 95% CI. Univariate Cox proportional hazards model (i.e., logrank test) will be used to estimate hazard ratios (HR: control arm versus investigational arm) with a 95% CI. When appropriate, multivariate Cox analyses will be performed, in which a univariate selection procedure will serve to identify eligible explanatory variables with univariate Cox (using Wald test) p-value lower than 0.10 as potential prognostic value. Follow-up will be estimated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method, and will be described using the median with its 95% CI.

  8. Surgical morbidity

    Time frame: Up to 6 months post surgery

    Rates of surgical complications according to Surgical morbidity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version [v] 5.0 & Clavien Dindo classification and mortality (30-day post-operative for adverse events and up to 6 months post-operative for adverse events of interest).

  9. Mortality

    Time frame: Up to 6 months post surgery

    Mortality rates (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version [v] 5.0 & Clavien Dindo classification and mortality (30-day post-operative for adverse events and up to 6 months post-operative for adverse events of interest).

  10. Intraoperative injuries

    Time frame: During surgery

    Coded as yes or no and categorized as involving the bowel, veins, arteries, ureter, bladder, or other site.

  11. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) converted to laparotomy

    Time frame: During surgery

    Prospectively completed forms documented reasons for conversion of MIS to laparotomy.

  12. Cost of the procedure

    Time frame: Up to 6 months post surgery

    A cost analysis may be performed in some countries.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jose A. Rauh-Hain, MD, MPH

CONTACT

[email protected]

713-794-1759

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

Laparoscopic Cytoreduction After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Oct 5, 2020
Registry last updated
Mar 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.