Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05906134

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Pain Control Trial

A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-ablation plus intercostal nerve blocks, and serratus plane catheter plus intercostal nerve blocks in patients undergoing esophagectomies with minimally invasive thoracic approaches.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Postoperative Pain, Acute Neurologic Manifestations Pain Pain, Postoperative Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Postoperative Complications Signs and Symptoms

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1 / Phase 2

Primary location

About this study

Pilot study planned to consent 30 patients in total with a projected study timeline of 2-3 years for completion. Participants will be enrolled in the study and randomized in their preoperative clinic visit. On the day of surgery, they will receive the intervention they were randomized to. 10 patients will be randomized to the intercostal block group, 10 patients will be randomized to the cryo-ablation plus intercostal block group, and 10 patients will be randomized to the serratus plane catheter plus intercostal block group. They will be followed throughout their hospital stay until discharge for data collection purposes. Once the patient is discharged from the hospital, post-operative follow-up in the Swedish Thoracic Surgery Clinic will be collected up to 1 year post-operatively.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

All adult individuals who undergo an esophagectomy with an intended minimally invasive approach of the chest at Swedish Medical Center-First Hill. These approaches include:

  • 3-hole with R video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)
  • Ivor Lewis R VATS

Exclusion criteria

  • Age <18
  • Unable to consent
  • Additional surgical procedures planned
  • Patients with previous thoracic surgery
  • Patient with chronic pain on a daily regimen of narcotics
  • Non-English speaking
  • Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia (ongoing anticoagulation, anticipated post-operative therapeutic anticoagulation, spinal cord stimulators, anatomic abnormalities preventing epidural placement)

Treatment and study plan

Local intercostal nerve block

Procedure

Patients receiving intercostal blocks will receive a total of 1.0 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine. This will be divided into two-thirds allocated for use in the chest/intercostal block and one-third allocated for use in the abdomen.

Cryo-analgesia and intercostal nerve block

Procedure

The cryo-ablation will occur 2 cm from the sympathetic chain 2 intercostal spaces above and 2 intercostal spaces below the access incision. The patient will also receive a total of 1.2 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine. This will be divided into two-thirds allocated for use in the chest/intercostal block and one-third allocated for use in the abdomen.

Other names: Cryo-ablation

Serratus plane catheter blocks and intercostal nerve blocks

Procedure

A total of 1.2 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine will be administered. A total of 20 cc of the weight-based calculation will be reserved for the serratus plane catheter. The remaining local anesthetic will be divided into two-thirds for the chest and one-third for the abdomen. Patients with serratus plane catheters will have an ongoing infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 8 ml per hour. The serratus plane catheters will also receive a bolus of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine on POD #1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 by the pain service.

Thoracic epidural catheter

Procedure

The pain service and thoracic surgery attending physician will assess if the patient's pain is not well-controlled using the pain modality they are randomized to. If additional pain control is needed, this will likely consist of a thoracic epidural catheter.

Any additional pain control will be added as an adjunct to the study arm and will be noted in the data set.

Primary outcomes

  1. Post Operative Pain Change Over Time

    Time frame: Baseline (prior to OR) to every 12 hours postoperatively thru Post Operative Day 4.

    Compare post-operative pain score changes over time between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

  2. Post Operative Pain

    Time frame: Baseline (Prior to OR)

    Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

  3. Post Operative Pain

    Time frame: Post-Op Time 0

    Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

  4. Post Operative Pain Day 1 (AM)

    Time frame: Post Operative Day 1 (AM)

    Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

  5. Post Operative Pain Day 1 (PM)

    Time frame: Post Operative Day 1 (PM)

    Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

  6. Post Operative Pain Day 2 (AM)

    Time frame: Post Operative Day 2 (AM)

    Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

  7. Post Operative Pain Day 2 (PM)

    Time frame: Post Operative Day 2 (PM)

    Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

  8. Post Operative Pain Day 3 (AM)

    Time frame: Post Operative Day 3 (AM)

    Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

  9. Post Operative Pain Day 3 (PM)

    Time frame: Post Operative Day 3 (PM)

    Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

  10. Post Operative Pain Day 4 (AM)

    Time frame: Post Operative Day 4 (AM)

    Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

  11. Post Operative Pain Day 4 (PM)

    Time frame: Post Operative Day 4 (PM)

    Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Brian Louie, M.D.

CONTACT

[email protected]

(206) 215-6800

Meagan Ivy, M.D.

CONTACT

[email protected]

(206) 215-6800

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Swedish Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Local Intercostal Nerve Blocks, Cryo-ablation Plus Intercostal Nerve Blocks, and Serratus Plane Catheter Plus Intercostal Nerve Blocks After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jun 15, 2023
Registry last updated
Jul 23, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.