Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05003778

Minimal Equipment Training Approach to Improve Warfighter Performance

The purpose of this project is to compare a minimal equipment training program with and without blood flow restriction (BFR) training to periodized concurrent resistance and endurance training. The outcomes of interest are Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) performance along with laboratory measures of performance, which include body composition, power, strength, and maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max). Additionally, based on the role of mechanical tension in connective tissue adaptation and the importance for chronic musculoskeletal health, tendon architecture will be assessed as well. Lastly, specific blood-based biomarkers will be analyzed in conjunction with questionnaires to determine the systemic physiological and psychological responses to training. Participants will be randomized into one of three training groups and will follow their respective program for 6 weeks. The three groups are traditional concurrent resistance and endurance training, minimal equipment training, and minimal equipment training with blood flow restriction (BFR).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of South Carolina Sport Science Lab

Columbia, South Carolina, 29201, United States

About this study

The efficacy of minimal equipment training programs with an emphasis on resistance training has seldom been assessed and compared to traditional strength training. Common training strategies include traditional high-to-moderate load resistance training and low-to-moderate load field training using minimal equipment. The benefit of traditional CT is likely due to the higher loads relative to 1-repetition maximum (1RM) utilized and overall amount of mechanical stress incurred. It is difficult to mimic this loading with minimal equipment training, which is often performed at low loads relative to 1RM. However, one strategy to improve the effectiveness of minimal equipment training may be the addition of blood flow restriction (BFR) training. Due to the relatively low loads (20-70% 1RM) of minimal equipment training, BFR training not only provides athletes with a novel training modality to elicit hypertrophic and strength adaptation but also to augment recovery as a supplemental low-damage, high-volume training method. The research design will allow for the direct comparison of minimal equipment training with and without additional BFR training to periodized CT with regard to changes in outcomes, in particular, ACFT performance.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females between the ages of 18 and 35 (inclusive) and enrolled in an ROTC program.
  • Subject has provided written and dated informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Subject is in good health as determined by medical history and is cleared for exercise.
  • Subject will be asked about dietary supplementation use within the past 6 months.
  • If subject began taking a supplement within the past month, subject will be asked to discontinue supplement use followed by a 2-week washout prior to participation.
  • In all other cases, we will request that subjects maintain supplement use.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects with any musculoskeletal injuries that would prevent exercising.
  • Subjects with any metabolic disorder including known electrolyte abnormalities, diabetes, thyroid disease, adrenal disease or hypogonadism.
  • Subjects with any inborn error of metabolism.
  • Subjects with a history of hepatorenal, musculoskeletal, autoimmune, or neurologic disease.
  • Subjects with a personal history of heart disease, high blood pressure (systolic >140 mm Hg & diastolic >90 mm Hg), psychiatric disorders, cancer, benign prostate hypertrophy, gastric ulcer, reflux disease, or any other medical condition deemed ineligible to participate in physical training by the ROTC athletic trainers or ROTC medical staff.
  • Subjects currently taking thyroid, hyperlipidemic, hypoglycemic, anti-hypertensive, or anti-coagulant medications.
  • Subjects who are pregnant or lactating.

Treatment and study plan

Traditional equipment resistance training

Other

Participants will undergo 6 weeks of traditional equipment resistance training

Minimal equipment resistance training

Other

Participants will undergo 6 weeks of minimal equipment resistance training

Blood Flow Restriction training

Other

Participants will undergo 6 weeks of blood flow restriction training

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Army Combat Fitness Test

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    6-event task to assess various aspects of human performance (muscular power, muscular strength, muscular endurance, anaerobic capacity, and aerobic capacity). Tests include 3-repetition maximum trap-bar deadlift, standing power throw with 10-lb ball, 2-min hand-release push-ups, sprint-drag-carry, 2-min leg tucks, and 2-mile run.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in muscular power

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    Assessed via countermovement vertical jump height.

  2. Change in muscular strength

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    Assessed via 3-repetition maximum bench press.

  3. Change in aerobic capacity

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    Assessed via treadmill-based maximal graded exercise test with indirect calorimetry.

  4. Change in body mass

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    Body mass via calibrated scale.

  5. Change in body composition

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    Body fat percentage, fat-free mass, and fat mass via air-displacement plethysmography.

  6. Change in muscle and tendon thickness

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    Biceps brachii and quadriceps muscle thickness via B-mode ultrasound and distal biceps tendon and quadriceps tendon via B-mode ultrasound.

  7. Change in blood-based biomarkers

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    Basal hormonal and biochemical assessments. Cortisol, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, IL-1β, growth hormone (GH), and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1).

  8. Change in blood lactate responses

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6

    Biochemical responses to exercise. Blood lactate sampled pre-, mid-, and post-exercise during training sessions in weeks 1, 3, and 6.

  9. Change in training distress

    Time frame: Baseline and every subsequent week through Week 6

    Overall training distress and subscales including depressed moods, vigor, physical signs and symptoms, sleep disturbances, perceived stress, and general fatigue. The Multicomponent Training Distress Scale will be administered weekly.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of South Carolina

Other

Collaborators

  • United States Department of Defense

Registry information

Official study title

The Effects of a Minimal Equipment Training Approach Compared to Concurrent Training to Improve Warfighter Health and Performance

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Aug 12, 2021
Registry last updated
Nov 29, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.