London Health Sciences Center- University Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
NCT Number: NCT01064531
The objectives of this study are to assess migration of the MIS Stem compared to the Synergy Hip System using Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA), and to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of the study device. This study will document any device-related surgical or post-operative complications and adverse radiographic observations.
Subjects meeting the entrance criteria specified in this protocol will be randomized as they become available.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
The purpose of the current investigation is to compare migration of the device after implantation with a modular, short hip stem called the "MIS Stem" or a standard THA using the Synergy Hip System using RSA. The intended use of this product is for patients with inflammatory and non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease who require a primary total hip replacement.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Discharge (baseline), 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years postoperative, change from baseline at 2 years reported
Migration, or micromovement of the implant, was measured using RSA to compare the modular, short hip stem called the MIS Stem against a standard THA using Synergy Hip System.
Time frame: Discharge (baseline), 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years postoperative, change from baseline at 2 years reported
Migration, or micromovement of the implant, was measured using RSA to compare the modular, short hip stem called the MIS Stem against a standard THA using Synergy Hip System.
Time frame: Preoperative
The HHS is a physician tool to measure how a subject is doing after their hip was replaced. The HHS had a total range of 0-100 points and consisted of categories to assess Pain, Function, Absence of Deformity, Range of Motion, and Total Score. Each category was summarized and stratified into scores of Excellent (90-100), Good (80-89), Fair (70-79), Poor (60-69), and Very Poor (<60). Higher scores delineated better results for the subject.
Time frame: 3 months postoperative
The HHS is a physician tool to measure how a subject is doing after their hip was replaced. The HHS had a total range of 0-100 points and consisted of categories to assess Pain, Function, Absence of Deformity, Range of Motion, and Total Score. Each category was summarized and stratified into scores of Excellent (90-100), Good (80-89), Fair (70-79), Poor (60-69), and Very Poor (<60). Higher scores delineated better results for the subject.
Time frame: 1 year postoperative
The HHS is a physician tool to measure how a subject is doing after their hip was replaced. The HHS had a total range of 0-100 points and consisted of categories to assess Pain, Function, Absence of Deformity, Range of Motion, and Total Score. Each category was summarized and stratified into scores of Excellent (90-100), Good (80-89), Fair (70-79), Poor (60-69), and Very Poor (<60). Higher scores delineated better results for the subject.
Time frame: 2 years postoperative
The HHS is a physician tool to measure how a subject is doing after their hip was replaced. The HHS had a total range of 0-100 points and consisted of categories to assess Pain, Function, Absence of Deformity, Range of Motion, and Total Score. Each category was summarized and stratified into scores of Excellent (90-100), Good (80-89), Fair (70-79), Poor (60-69), and Very Poor (<60). Higher scores delineated better results for the subject.
Time frame: 3 years postoperative
The HHS is a physician tool to measure how a subject is doing after their hip was replaced. The HHS had a total range of 0-100 points and consisted of categories to assess Pain, Function, Absence of Deformity, Range of Motion, and Total Score. Each category was summarized and stratified into scores of Excellent (90-100), Good (80-89), Fair (70-79), Poor (60-69), and Very Poor (<60). Higher scores delineated better results for the subject.
Time frame: 5 years postoperative
The HHS is a physician tool to measure how a subject is doing after their hip was replaced. The HHS had a total range of 0-100 points and consisted of categories to assess Pain, Function, Absence of Deformity, Range of Motion, and Total Score. Each category was summarized and stratified into scores of Excellent (90-100), Good (80-89), Fair (70-79), Poor (60-69), and Very Poor (<60). Higher scores delineated better results for the subject.
Time frame: Preoperative
The HOOS was a questionnaire that the subject completed focusing on hip pain, stiffness, and function relating to osteoarthritis of the hip. The HOOS consisted of 40 items assessing 5 subscales; Symptoms and Stiffness, Pain, Function of Daily Living, Function in Sport and Recreation, and hip-related Quality of Life.
Pain included 10 items with a total score of 40 points Symptoms included 5 items with a total score of 20 points Function of Daily Living included 17 items with a total score of 68 points Function in Sport and Recreation included 4 items with a total score of 16 points Hip-related Quality of Life included 4 items with a total score of 16 points
Each subscore was transformed into a worst-to-best scale (0-100), where 100 indicated no symptoms and 0 indicated extreme symptoms.
Time frame: 3 months postoperative
The HOOS was a questionnaire that the subject completed focusing on hip pain, stiffness, and function relating to osteoarthritis of the hip. The HOOS consisted of 40 items assessing 5 subscales; Symptoms and Stiffness, Pain, Function of Daily Living, Function in Sport and Recreation, and hip-related Quality of Life.
Pain included 10 items with a total score of 40 points Symptoms included 5 items with a total score of 20 points Function of Daily Living included 17 items with a total score of 68 points Function in Sport and Recreation included 4 items with a total score of 16 points Hip-related Quality of Life included 4 items with a total score of 16 points
Each subscore was transformed into a worst-to-best scale (0-100), where 100 indicated no symptoms and 0 indicated extreme symptoms.
Time frame: 1 year postoperative
The HOOS was a questionnaire that the subject completed focusing on hip pain, stiffness, and function relating to osteoarthritis of the hip. The HOOS consisted of 40 items assessing 5 subscales; Symptoms and Stiffness, Pain, Function of Daily Living, Function in Sport and Recreation, and hip-related Quality of Life.
Pain included 10 items with a total score of 40 points Symptoms included 5 items with a total score of 20 points Function of Daily Living included 17 items with a total score of 68 points Function in Sport and Recreation included 4 items with a total score of 16 points Hip-related Quality of Life included 4 items with a total score of 16 points
Each subscore was transformed into a worst-to-best scale (0-100), where 100 indicated no symptoms and 0 indicated extreme symptoms.
Time frame: 2 years postoperative
The HOOS was a questionnaire that the subject completed focusing on hip pain, stiffness, and function relating to osteoarthritis of the hip. The HOOS consisted of 40 items assessing 5 subscales; Symptoms and Stiffness, Pain, Function of Daily Living, Function in Sport and Recreation, and hip-related Quality of Life.
Pain included 10 items with a total score of 40 points Symptoms included 5 items with a total score of 20 points Function of Daily Living included 17 items with a total score of 68 points Function in Sport and Recreation included 4 items with a total score of 16 points Hip-related Quality of Life included 4 items with a total score of 16 points
Each subscore was transformed into a worst-to-best scale (0-100), where 100 indicated no symptoms and 0 indicated extreme symptoms.
Time frame: 3 years postoperative
The HOOS was a questionnaire that the subject completed focusing on hip pain, stiffness, and function relating to osteoarthritis of the hip. The HOOS consisted of 40 items assessing 5 subscales; Symptoms and Stiffness, Pain, Function of Daily Living, Function in Sport and Recreation, and hip-related Quality of Life.
Pain included 10 items with a total score of 40 points Symptoms included 5 items with a total score of 20 points Function of Daily Living included 17 items with a total score of 68 points Function in Sport and Recreation included 4 items with a total score of 16 points Hip-related Quality of Life included 4 items with a total score of 16 points
Each subscore was transformed into a worst-to-best scale (0-100), where 100 indicated no symptoms and 0 indicated extreme symptoms.
Time frame: 5 years postoperative
The HOOS was a questionnaire that the subject completed focusing on hip pain, stiffness, and function relating to osteoarthritis of the hip. The HOOS consisted of 40 items assessing 5 subscales; Symptoms and Stiffness, Pain, Function of Daily Living, Function in Sport and Recreation, and hip-related Quality of Life.
Pain included 10 items with a total score of 40 points Symptoms included 5 items with a total score of 20 points Function of Daily Living included 17 items with a total score of 68 points Function in Sport and Recreation included 4 items with a total score of 16 points Hip-related Quality of Life included 4 items with a total score of 16 points
Each subscore was transformed into a worst-to-best scale (0-100), where 100 indicated no symptoms and 0 indicated extreme symptoms.
Time frame: Preoperative
Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.
Time frame: 3 months postoperative
Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.
Time frame: 1 year postoperative
Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.
Time frame: 2 years postoperative
Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.
Time frame: 3 years postoperative
Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.
Time frame: 5 years postoperative
Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Industry
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Implant Migration of the MIS Stem Versus The Synergy Total Hip System by Radiostereometric Analysis
Acronym: MISRSA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05530551
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Aabenraa, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT03737149
Arthritis, Bronchial Diseases
Fremont, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07427238
Arthritis, Hip Pain Chronic
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03102580
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details