Aurora Endometrial Ablation
DeviceEndometrial Ablation using the Aurora Endometrial Ablation system
NCT Number: NCT01569763
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Aurora Endometrial Ablation System as compared to hysteroscopic rollerball endometrial ablation in reducing menstrual blood loss at 12 months post-treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me25 year–50 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
McMaster University/Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Menorrhagia is defined as menstrual bleeding in the ovulatory woman exceeding 80 ml per month. Approximately 20-25% of healthy premenopausal women have abnormal uterine bleeding. Menorrhagia can have a negative impact on a woman's lifestyle and self-perception, often leading her to seek definitive treatment. Pharmacologic treatment for menorrhagia is not always successful, and dilatation and curettage typically provides relief for only a few menstrual cycles. Traditionally hysterectomy has been the definitive treatment for menorrhagia. This clinical study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the Aurora Endometrial Ablation System to provide a therapeutic treatment for menorrhagia due to benign causes by ablating the endometrial lining of the uterus in pre-menopausal women for whom childbearing is complete. Subjects who are randomized to the control group will receive hysteroscopic rollerball/resection ablation. Subjects randomized to the test arm will be treated with the Aurora Endometrial Ablation System.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endometrial Ablation using the Aurora Endometrial Ablation system
Hysteroscopic rollerball resection/ablation
Time frame: 12 months
Clinical success was defined as a reduction in menstrual bleeding volume to ≤ 80 ml as measured by the alkaline hematin method (AH). Clinical success was not achieved if: (1) at one year post-treatment menstrual blood loss is greater than 80ml, as measured by AH; (2) an acute failure occurred (e.g., aborted procedure, etc.); or (3) the subject required additional therapy to control menorrhagia.
Time frame: < 1 hour
Procedure time is defined as the time from device insertion to time of device removal.
Minerva Surgical, Inc.
Industry
Minerva Pivotal Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03670680
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Bron, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04267562
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Newburgh, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03751800
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Many Locations, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03642210
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details