University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N5B2, Canada
NCT Number: NCT05382026
Canada's Food Guide places an increased emphasis on plant-based proteins; however, Canadians who consume a plant-based diet may be compromised because of intake of lower-quality protein. Consumption of high-quality protein is important during growth and development, especially in highly active individuals. The study will compare milk (i.e. high quality protein) to a pea-based beverage (i.e. lower quality plant-based protein) in adolescent boys and girls who are engaged in resistance-training programs as part of their athletic training. One-hundred and fourteen adolescent boys and girls (12-17y of age) will be divided into groups that consume milk, a pea-beverage, or a carbohydrate (sugar) beverage after resistance training sessions performed three times per week for six months. It is predicted that the group consuming milk will have greater increases in muscle mass, strength, and bone density, and greater reductions in fat mass compared to the groups consuming a pea-based or carbohydrate beverages.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N5B2, Canada
Milk protein is important especially for very active people and in the context of plant-based diets, which are lower in protein quality. The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of milk supplementation to pea-beverage supplementation during resistance training programs for increasing lean tissue mass in adolescent boys and girls. Secondary and tertiary outcomes include fat mass, bone mineral density, and muscular strength. It is hypothesized that milk supplementation during resistance training will be more effective than plant-based proteins (i.e. pea-beverage) for increasing muscle mass, reducing fat mass, and improving bone mineral outcomes in adolescent boys and girls. One-hundred and fourteen boys and girls (aged 12-17y) who are currently enrolled in resistance training programs (3 times per week for 6 months) as part of their competitive athletic programs will be stratified by sex and maturity status before being randomized to three groups: 1) 1% chocolate milk supplementation; 2) pea-based beverage; 3) carbohydrate beverage (placebo control). Beverages will be consumed during recovery from each resistance training session (i.e. 250 ml immediately after training and 250 ml one hour later to optimize post-exercise protein synthesis) over the six-month intervention. It is anticipated that milk supplementation will be more effective than plant-based protein supplementation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
1% chocolate milk
Time frame: 6 months
Lean tissue mass measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 6 months
Fat mass measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 6 months
Lumbar spine bone mineral density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 6 months
Hip bone mineral density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 6 months
Bench press strength predicted from resistance lifted for 6-10 repetitions
Time frame: 6 months
Squat strength predicted from resistance lifted for 6-10 repetitions
Time frame: 6 months
Cross-sectional moment of inertia measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 6 months
Section modulus measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 6 months
Cross-sectional area measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 6 months
Cortical thickness measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 6 months
Buckling ratio measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
University of Saskatchewan
Other
Milk Versus a Pea-based Beverage for Increasing Muscle Mass and Bone Mineral Density During Resistance Training in Adolescent Boys and Girls
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07689487
Aging, Atrophy
Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04742010
Atrophy, Bariatric Surgery
Esbjerg, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT04900701
Aging, Atrophy
Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06910254
Atrophy, Brain Diseases
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial Details