Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07527507

Microteaching Method on Urinary Catheterization Practice Skill

Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of the microteaching approach on the urinary catheterization skills and satisfaction levels of nursing students.

Desing: The study was conducted using a randomised controlled trial design. Methods: The study was conducted between February and May 2025 in the Department of Nursing at a university in eastern Türkiye. A power analysis determined that the sample size should be 60 students (30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group). Data were collected using the "Student Information Form", the "Urinary Catheterisation Skill Assessment Checklist" and the "Visual Analog Scale-Satisfaction".

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hakime Aslan

Malatya, 44280, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

During the first two weeks of the study, students in both the experimental and control groups received four hours of theoretical and practical training in urinary catheterization each week. In the third week, pre-test data was collected from both the experimental and control groups. As part of this process, students were given the 'Student Information Form', the 'Urinary Catheterisation Skill Assessment Checklist' and the 'Visual Analog Scale-Satisfaction', and asked to complete them. To assess the students' skill levels in the groups, a researcher and an independent observer evaluated each student's urinary catheterisation skills individually using an unobserver-participation observation method. The results of the evaluation were recorded on checklists.

From the fourth week onwards, the experimental group underwent training using the microteaching method. The skill of performing urinary catheterization was taught over the course of six weeks using this method.

Meanwhile, the students in the control group continued their education using traditional teaching methods for five weeks.

Post-test data were collected from students in the experimental and control groups in Week 10.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • To be taking Principles of Nursing II for the first time.
  • To consent to the evaluation of your clinical practice and to its video recording.
  • To volunteer to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Have completed training in urinary system procedures, in addition to basic nursing education.
  • Have graduated from a vocational high school or an associate degree programme in a health-related field.
  • Be willing to leave the research process.

Treatment and study plan

Microteaching education method

Behavioral

During the first two weeks of the study, students in both the experimental and control groups received four hours of theoretical and practical training in urinary catheterization each week. Each student was given the opportunity to perform the procedure at least once, and those who performed it inadequately or incompletely were allowed to repeat it. In the third week, pre-test data was collected from both the experimental and control groups. As part of this process, students were given the 'Student Information Form', the 'Urinary Catheterisation Skill Assessment Checklist' and the 'Visual Analog Scale-Satisfaction', and asked to complete them.

From the fourth week onwards, the experimental group underwent training using the microteaching method. The skill of performing urinary catheterization was taught over the course of six weeks using this method. Post-test data were collected from students in the experimental and control groups in Week 10.

Primary outcomes

  1. Effect of Urinary Catheterization Skill

    Time frame: 10 week

    During the first two weeks of the study, students in both the experimental and control groups received four hours of theoretical and practical training in urinary catheterisation each week. In the third week, pre-test data was collected from both the experimental and control groups. As part of this process, students were given the 'Student Information Form', the 'Urinary Catheterisation Skill Assessment Checklist' To assess the students' skill levels in the groups, a researcher and an independent observer evaluated each student's urinary catheterisation skills individually using an unobserver-participation observation method. The results of the evaluation were recorded on checklists.

    Post-test data were collected from students in the experimental and control groups in Week 10.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effect of satisfiction

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    During the first two weeks of the study, students in both the experimental and control groups received four hours of theoretical and practical training in urinary catheterisation each week. In the third week, pre-test data was collected from both the experimental and control groups. As part of this process, students were given the 'Student Information Form', the ''VAS Satisfaction Scale'' to assess the students' satisfaction with teaching method levels in the groups.

    Post-test data were collected from students in the experimental and control groups in Week 10.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Inonu University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of the Microteaching Method on Urinary Catheterization Practice Skills and Level of Satisfaction: Randomised Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Apr 14, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.