Hakime Aslan
Malatya, 44280, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07527507
Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of the microteaching approach on the urinary catheterization skills and satisfaction levels of nursing students.
Desing: The study was conducted using a randomised controlled trial design. Methods: The study was conducted between February and May 2025 in the Department of Nursing at a university in eastern Türkiye. A power analysis determined that the sample size should be 60 students (30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group). Data were collected using the "Student Information Form", the "Urinary Catheterisation Skill Assessment Checklist" and the "Visual Analog Scale-Satisfaction".
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–35 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Malatya, 44280, Turkey (Türkiye)
During the first two weeks of the study, students in both the experimental and control groups received four hours of theoretical and practical training in urinary catheterization each week. In the third week, pre-test data was collected from both the experimental and control groups. As part of this process, students were given the 'Student Information Form', the 'Urinary Catheterisation Skill Assessment Checklist' and the 'Visual Analog Scale-Satisfaction', and asked to complete them. To assess the students' skill levels in the groups, a researcher and an independent observer evaluated each student's urinary catheterisation skills individually using an unobserver-participation observation method. The results of the evaluation were recorded on checklists.
From the fourth week onwards, the experimental group underwent training using the microteaching method. The skill of performing urinary catheterization was taught over the course of six weeks using this method.
Meanwhile, the students in the control group continued their education using traditional teaching methods for five weeks.
Post-test data were collected from students in the experimental and control groups in Week 10.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
During the first two weeks of the study, students in both the experimental and control groups received four hours of theoretical and practical training in urinary catheterization each week. Each student was given the opportunity to perform the procedure at least once, and those who performed it inadequately or incompletely were allowed to repeat it. In the third week, pre-test data was collected from both the experimental and control groups. As part of this process, students were given the 'Student Information Form', the 'Urinary Catheterisation Skill Assessment Checklist' and the 'Visual Analog Scale-Satisfaction', and asked to complete them.
From the fourth week onwards, the experimental group underwent training using the microteaching method. The skill of performing urinary catheterization was taught over the course of six weeks using this method. Post-test data were collected from students in the experimental and control groups in Week 10.
Time frame: 10 week
During the first two weeks of the study, students in both the experimental and control groups received four hours of theoretical and practical training in urinary catheterisation each week. In the third week, pre-test data was collected from both the experimental and control groups. As part of this process, students were given the 'Student Information Form', the 'Urinary Catheterisation Skill Assessment Checklist' To assess the students' skill levels in the groups, a researcher and an independent observer evaluated each student's urinary catheterisation skills individually using an unobserver-participation observation method. The results of the evaluation were recorded on checklists.
Post-test data were collected from students in the experimental and control groups in Week 10.
Time frame: 10 weeks
During the first two weeks of the study, students in both the experimental and control groups received four hours of theoretical and practical training in urinary catheterisation each week. In the third week, pre-test data was collected from both the experimental and control groups. As part of this process, students were given the 'Student Information Form', the ''VAS Satisfaction Scale'' to assess the students' satisfaction with teaching method levels in the groups.
Post-test data were collected from students in the experimental and control groups in Week 10.
Inonu University
Other
The Effect of the Microteaching Method on Urinary Catheterization Practice Skills and Level of Satisfaction: Randomised Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06052007
Behavior, Nursing Caries
Sakarya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06848049
Application Site Wound, Nursing Caries
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06891339
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Nursing Caries
İnönü, Eskişehir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06866470
Exercise Addiction, Hemodialysis Complication
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details