Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, 410083, China
NCT Number: NCT07667972
This clinical study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of microfocused ultrasound treatment in patients with facial pigmentary diseases and rosacea.
The study includes two independent disease cohorts: a facial pigmentary disease cohort and a rosacea cohort. Participants in each cohort will be randomly assigned to receive either active microfocused ultrasound treatment or sham stimulation. Sham stimulation will follow the same treatment procedure as active treatment but will not deliver effective therapeutic ultrasound energy.
Participants will receive one treatment session per month for 6 months and will be followed for up to 12 months. The study will assess changes in clinical severity scores, digital skin imaging parameters, patient-reported symptoms, quality of life, and safety outcomes, including adverse events.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me20 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Changsha, Hunan, 410083, China
This is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, assessor-blinded, parallel-group clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of microfocused ultrasound in patients with facial pigmentary diseases and rosacea.
The study consists of two independent disease cohorts. The facial pigmentary disease cohort will include participants with eligible facial pigmentary disorders, such as melasma, periorbital hyperpigmentation, melanosis, and lichen planus pigmentosus. The rosacea cohort will include participants who meet the diagnostic criteria for rosacea. Each cohort will be randomized separately in a 1:1 ratio to either the active microfocused ultrasound group or the sham stimulation control group.
Participants assigned to the active treatment group will receive microfocused ultrasound treatment once monthly for 6 months. The planned treatment parameters include a power range of 3.76 to 5.12 W and a frequency of 8 Hz, with each session stopped after the preset treatment endpoint is reached. Participants assigned to the sham stimulation group will undergo the same procedure, including use of ultrasound coupling gel, probe contact, treatment environment, and treatment duration, but without delivery of effective therapeutic energy.
Efficacy assessments will include investigator-assessed clinical severity scores, patient-reported outcome measures, VISIA digital skin analysis, dermatology-related quality of life assessment, and psychological symptom assessment. Safety will be evaluated through physical examination, vital signs, and monitoring of adverse events and serious adverse events throughout the study.
An exploratory tissue sample substudy may be conducted in participants who voluntarily provide additional informed consent. This substudy is exploratory and will not affect participation in the main study or the primary efficacy analysis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Active microfocused ultrasound treatment will be administered using an ultrasound therapy device. Treatment parameters are planned as power 3.76 to 5.12 W and frequency 8 Hz. Each treatment session will stop when the preset treatment endpoint. Treatment will be performed once monthly for 6 months.
Sham stimulation will use the same procedure as active microfocused ultrasound treatment, including ultrasound coupling gel, probe contact, treatment environment, and treatment duration, but will not deliver effective therapeutic ultrasound energy.
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
Change from baseline to Month 6 in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI)-based pigment area and severity score in the pigmentary disease cohort. The score assesses lesion area, darkness, and homogeneity across facial regions. Total scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating more severe pigmentation.
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
Change from baseline to Month 6 in the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) score in the rosacea cohort. The CEA score ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates clear or no erythema and 4 indicates severe erythema. Higher scores indicate more severe erythema.
Time frame: Baseline to Months 2, 4, and 12
Change from baseline to Months 2, 4, and 12 in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI)-based pigment area and severity score in the pigmentary disease cohort. The score assesses lesion area, darkness, and homogeneity across facial regions. Total scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating more severe pigmentation.
Time frame: Baseline to Months 6 and 12
Change from baseline in the Melasma Quality of Life Scale score in the pigmentary disease cohort. The scale contains 10 items scored from 1 to 7. Total scores range from 10 to 70, with higher scores indicating worse health-related quality of life and greater disease impact.
Time frame: Baseline to Months 2, 4, and 12
Change from baseline to Months 2, 4, and 12 in the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) score in the rosacea cohort. The CEA score ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates clear or no erythema and 4 indicates severe erythema. Higher scores indicate more severe erythema.
Time frame: Baseline to Months 6 and 12
Change from baseline in patient-assessed flushing severity score in the rosacea cohort. Flushing is assessed using the rosacea clinical study patient assessment form. Scores range from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates none and 4 indicates always present. Higher scores indicate more frequent or more severe flushing.
Time frame: Baseline to Months 6 and 12
Change from baseline in patient- and investigator-assessed rosacea clinical symptom severity scores. Patient-assessed symptoms are evaluated using the rosacea clinical study patient assessment form, and investigator-assessed signs are evaluated using the rosacea clinical study investigator assessment form. Each item is scored from 0 to 4. For patient-assessed items, 0 indicates none and 4 indicates always present. For investigator-assessed items, 0 indicates clear or none and 4 indicates severe. Higher scores indicate more severe rosacea symptoms or signs.
Time frame: Baseline to Months 6 and 12
Change from baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score. The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire assessing dermatology-related quality of life. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline to Months 6 and 12
Change from baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score. The PHQ-9 contains 9 items, each scored from 0 to 3. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline through Month 12
Incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, and treatment-related local reactions, including facial numbness and skin pain.
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Other
A Prospective, Randomized, Sham-controlled, Assessor-blinded, Parallel-group Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Microfocused Ultrasound in Patients With Facial Pigmentary Diseases and Rosacea
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06763367
Acne, Acne Vulgaris
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05942248
Acne, Acne Vulgaris
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07036302
Acne Scars - Mixed Atrophic and Hypertrophic, Hyperpigmentation
Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06644157
Hyperpigmentation, Melanosis
Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, France
View Trial Details