St James's Hospital
Dublin, D03 WK19, Ireland
NCT Number: NCT05357339
The sublingual microcirculation is impaired in sepsis and septic shock. Sidestream dark field imaging technology has been developed into a clinical tool to help the clinician assess the microcirculation at the bedside. The ideal resuscitation fluid has not been identified. The investigators aim to use this new bedside technology to establish the microcirculation properties of two popular resuscitation fluids.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dublin, D03 WK19, Ireland
Sepsis and septic shock are diseases of the microcirculation. Recent developments in microcirculation imaging have illustrated the extent of the impairment of the microcirculation in these diseases of critical care. Heterogenous flow, stagnation and microthrombi can all be seen clearly in the sublingual region using a sidestream dark field imaging device.
One of the key treatments for sepsis and septic shock is timely administration of intravenous fluids. Which fluid is administered is a matter for debate which has not been settled by several large trials. De-resuscitation has become increasingly important as physicians realise the implications and associated risks of excess fluid administration in ICU. Avoiding excess fluid administration at the resuscitation stage is therefore desirable. One of the prevailing theories about the function of albumin or colloid resuscitation is that it remains in the the intravascular space for a longer period of time, thereby continuing to benefit the patient and avoiding administration of excess fluid. However, recently albumin was tested against crystalloid for resuscitation and was shown to be effective but with no improvement in survival.
It is possible, however, that albumin is having an initial beneficial effect at a microcirculation level. Macrohaemodynamic improvements are not necessarily matched by improvements in blood flow and oxygen delivery to cells, this has been referred to as haemodynamic incoherence.
This randomised, prospective study aims to compare crystalloid and albumin resuscitation at a microcirculation level.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
100ml boluses 20% Albumin
100ml bolus of crystalloid
Time frame: Baseline at recruitment before fluid given, during bolus, after bolus: immediately after, 60 minutes after and 24 hours after to determine if immediate, delayed or sustained change in microcirculation parameters is influenced by fluid bolus
functional capillary density, perfused capillary density after fluid bolus Proportion Perfused vessels Microvascular Flow Index Total Vessel Density
Time frame: 28 days
Time frame: 28 days
Time frame: though to stud completion; up to 1 year
Time frame: 28 days
Rachael Cusack
Other
The Effect of Fluid Resuscitation with 20% Albumin Versus Crystalloid on the Microcirculation of Patients with Sepsis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06368336
Infections, Inflammation
View Trial DetailsNCT04747795
Infections, Inflammation
Antwerp, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT03708796
Diagnosis, Disease
Antibes, Alpes Maritimes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04203979
Infections, Inflammation
Oslo, Norway
View Trial Details