Children's Mercy Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States
NCT Number: NCT03041649
The objective of this study is to compare two low profile balloon gastrostomy button enteral feeding devices, both currently used as standard of medical care. The investigators aim to compare family preference and rate of complications between the two devices in a prospective cohort of children. This is the first step in comparing initial and long-term outcomes along with the need for seeking medical advice for gastrostomy site-related complications.
The secondary aim of this study is to follow this population long term (4 years) to document the prevalence of: granulation tissue, infection, skin breakdown, and how long the gastrostomy tube balloon remains functional (does not lose water).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me1 day–5 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States
This is a single center prospective, randomized study with a crossover design, comparing two low profile balloon gastrostomy buttons (Figure 1), MIC-Key™ and MINI One™ that are routinely used at CMH. Each subject will be randomly assigned to one button type at the time of initial placement. After placement, standard practice is to perform the first gastrostomy change in the clinic at 2 months where the primary caregivers replace the button under supervision. Therefore, the initial device after randomization will remain in place for 2 months. At the first scheduled device change, the other type of button will replace the original gastrostomy button device. This will remain in place for another 2 months. At the routine visit at 4 months the parents will be asked to choose which button they prefer to keep. This will meet the primary outcome endpoint of the study. The investigators will continue to follow as many subjects as possible to 4 years in order to identify any potential differences in secondary end points.
A caregiver satisfaction survey is routinely used in the clinics. Parent responses to this survey will be also be used in the study analysis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
After 2 months with each button, parents will be asked which button they prefer at the 4-month post-operational follow-up visit.
After 2 months with each button, parents will be asked which button they prefer at the 4-month post-operational follow-up visit.
Time frame: 4 months
Parents will be asked which button they prefer to keep at the 4-month visit.
Time frame: Up to 4 years after button placement
Providers will complete a brief checklist of gastrostomy tube maintenance and site complications at the 2-month button change, 4-month visit, and all subsequent follow-up visits while the button while the G-tube remains in place.
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Other
Mic-Key Versus Mini: A Prospective, Randomized Trial for Family Preference Comparing Low Profile Balloon Gastrostomy Buttons
Acronym: MicKeyVMini
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05556824
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03596411
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02083952
Apnea, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06329583
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial Details