Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03041649

Mic-Key Versus Mini One Family Preference Comparison

The objective of this study is to compare two low profile balloon gastrostomy button enteral feeding devices, both currently used as standard of medical care. The investigators aim to compare family preference and rate of complications between the two devices in a prospective cohort of children. This is the first step in comparing initial and long-term outcomes along with the need for seeking medical advice for gastrostomy site-related complications.

The secondary aim of this study is to follow this population long term (4 years) to document the prevalence of: granulation tissue, infection, skin breakdown, and how long the gastrostomy tube balloon remains functional (does not lose water).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

1 day–5 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Children's Mercy Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States

About this study

This is a single center prospective, randomized study with a crossover design, comparing two low profile balloon gastrostomy buttons (Figure 1), MIC-Key™ and MINI One™ that are routinely used at CMH. Each subject will be randomly assigned to one button type at the time of initial placement. After placement, standard practice is to perform the first gastrostomy change in the clinic at 2 months where the primary caregivers replace the button under supervision. Therefore, the initial device after randomization will remain in place for 2 months. At the first scheduled device change, the other type of button will replace the original gastrostomy button device. This will remain in place for another 2 months. At the routine visit at 4 months the parents will be asked to choose which button they prefer to keep. This will meet the primary outcome endpoint of the study. The investigators will continue to follow as many subjects as possible to 4 years in order to identify any potential differences in secondary end points.

A caregiver satisfaction survey is routinely used in the clinics. Parent responses to this survey will be also be used in the study analysis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children ages 0-5 years of age requiring 0.8 cm or 1.0 cm gastrostomy feeding devices for enteral nutrition seen in the Surgery, GI or Special Care clinics
  • Gastrostomy placement after IRB approval (enrollment will continue until 170 evaluable subjects have completed the 4 month visit. Expected attrition for the 4 year follow-up is 40%.
  • English-speaking families

Exclusion criteria

  • Children with dermatologic conditions influencing gastrostomy site healing and tract epithelialization
  • Children with immunosuppression
  • Children with active malignancy requiring treatment
  • Inability to commit to 4 months follow up

Treatment and study plan

GT button change - Mic-Key

Other

After 2 months with each button, parents will be asked which button they prefer at the 4-month post-operational follow-up visit.

GT button change - Mini One

Other

After 2 months with each button, parents will be asked which button they prefer at the 4-month post-operational follow-up visit.

Primary outcomes

  1. Parent preference

    Time frame: 4 months

    Parents will be asked which button they prefer to keep at the 4-month visit.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Enteral Access Assessment Sheet

    Time frame: Up to 4 years after button placement

    Providers will complete a brief checklist of gastrostomy tube maintenance and site complications at the 2-month button change, 4-month visit, and all subsequent follow-up visits while the button while the G-tube remains in place.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Mic-Key Versus Mini: A Prospective, Randomized Trial for Family Preference Comparing Low Profile Balloon Gastrostomy Buttons

Acronym: MicKeyVMini

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Feb 3, 2017
Registry last updated
Oct 21, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.