Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05584098

MEWS, qSOFA and Physiological Parameters Combination in the Emergency Room

In the development of sepsis treatment of recent years, the demand for medical manpower has increased significantly when patients with sepsis appear because of the expansion of medical care demand and shortened response time related to sepsis Due to the shortage of manpower, a more simple and easy-to-operate inspection method is adopted and artificial intelligence technology is used to assist in the evaluation.

The applicability of physiological indicators MEWS, qSOFA and physiological parameters combination as sepsis screening tools in emergency department (ED) and predicting sepsis outcome in the emergency department. When patients with sepsis appear, artificial intelligence technology is used to remind the physicians to respond and administer drugs as soon as possible.

This is a single-center retrospective study of a group of patients admitted to the emergency department. The medical records were reviewed, mainly based on the hospital site records and the existing vital signs of the patients. Attended a hospital emergency room between January 2020 and December 2022. Physiological numerical indicators MEWS and qSOFA were all scored to understand the distribution of sepsis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

St. Martin De Porres Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan

Loading trial locations.

About this study

  • A single-center retrospective study of a cohort of patients admitted to the emergency department
  • To see a doctor in the emergency department of the hospital between January 2020 and December 2022, review their medical records, and focus on the hospital's on-site records and the existing patient's vital signs.
  • The physiological indicators MEWS and qSOFA were scored to understand the distribution of sepsis.
  • Remind the doctor when a suspected sepsis patient appears under level 5 triage and use artificial intelligence technology to assist
  • This study will explore the specific improvement practices and effects of improving the response of patients with sepsis when they see a doctor
  • To analyze and evaluate the economics and benefits of this operation mode, improve the accuracy of emergency inspection of sepsis patients and improve the rationality of hospital manpower deployment
  • Scheduled progress of the plan: Patients who visited the emergency department of the hospital between January 2020 and December 2022 were included in this study under investigation. This is a retrospective study, and patients are required to undergo necessary examinations according to their own conditions, without any interference from the study

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • This is a single-center retrospective study of a group of patients admitted to the emergency department.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with incomplete treatment clinical data, lack of information in medical records, trauma patients

Treatment and study plan

qSOFA, MEWS and physiological parameters combination

Other

qSOFA ,MEWS and physiological parameters combination used in emergency medicine department could be helpful in the identification of the occurrence of sepsis

Primary outcomes

  1. qSOFA used in emergency medicine department

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression assessed up to 36 months

    The qSOFA score is a simple score consisting of three items: respiratory rate (RR) ≥ 22 breaths per minute, altered mentation (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] < 15), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 100 mmHg and lowest score is 1 and highest is 3. The more score will show more severe disease.

    MEWS score:Description Risk of death or ICU admission <3: patient in a stable condition, 3-4: Signs of respiratory failure. Consider higher level of care, ≥5: Patient in a critical condition. Higher level of care recommended

  2. Modified Early Warning Score(MEWS) which quickly determine whether a particular patient needs increased medical attention

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression assessed up to 36 months

    MEWS score = Systolic blood pressure + Heart rate + Urine output + Respiratory rate + Temperature + AVPU. The lowest score is 0 and highest score is 14. The more score will show more severe disease.

    MEWS score:Description Risk of death or ICU admission <3: patient in a stable condition, 3-4: Signs of respiratory failure. Consider higher level of care, ≥5: Patient in a critical condition. Higher level of care recommended

  3. physiological parameters combination

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression assessed up to 36 months

    Shock Index (SI) = Heart Rate / Systolic Blood Pressure Age-Adjusted Shock Index (Age SI) = Age x Shock Index Respiratory-Adjusted Shock Index (RASI) = HR/SBP × (RR/10)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

St. Martin De Porress Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and Physiological Parameters Combination to Predict the Occurrence of Sepsis in the Emergency Room

Acronym: qSOFA

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Oct 18, 2022
Registry last updated
Sep 8, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.