Methyl Aminolevulinate 8% and 16% Incubated by 1 and 3 for Actinic Keratoses Treatment

Quantitative evaluation: A count of the number of lesions with complete response, i.e., those that show total disappearance measurable after treatment, will be performed. These lesions will be clinically evaluated and the number of lesions at these periods will be compared with the initial value (baseline). Both the absolute and relative number of lesions will be considered. To avoid variability in counting, only one researcher will perform the counts.

Quantitative evaluation: A count of the number of lesions with complete response, i.e., those that show total disappearance measurable after treatment, will be performed. These lesions will be clinically evaluated and the number of lesions at these periods will be compared with the initial value (baseline). Both the absolute and relative number of lesions will be considered. To avoid variability in counting, only one researcher will perform the counts.

Quantitative evaluation: A count of the number of lesions with complete response, i.e., those that show total disappearance measurable after treatment, will be performed. These lesions will be clinically evaluated and the number of lesions at these periods will be compared with the initial value (baseline). Both the absolute and relative number of lesions will be considered. To avoid variability in counting, only one researcher will perform the counts.

Quantitative evaluation: A count of the number of lesions with complete response, i.e., those that show total disappearance measurable after treatment, will be performed. These lesions will be clinically evaluated and the number of lesions at these periods will be compared with the initial value (baseline). Both the absolute and relative number of lesions will be considered. To avoid variability in counting, only one researcher will perform the counts.

Evaluation of the proportion of participants who show at least a 75% reduction in the initial number of actinic keratosis lesions in the treatment area after the last day of treatment.

Evaluation of the proportion of participants who show at least a 75% reduction in the initial number of actinic keratosis lesions in the treatment area after the last day of treatment.

Evaluation of the proportion of participants who show at least a 75% reduction in the initial number of actinic keratosis lesions in the treatment area after the last day of treatment.

Evaluation of the proportion of participants who show at least a 75% reduction in the initial number of actinic keratosis lesions in the treatment area after the last day of treatment.

Defined as the reappearance of lesions in previously treated areas. Recurrence evaluation will occur at the same follow-up periods of the study, i.e., at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months after the end of treatment. Recurrent lesions will be quantified, considering both the absolute and relative number of lesions. These lesions will be monitored and re-treated at the end of the study, unless malignization occurs, in which case they will be treated immediately.

Defined as the reappearance of lesions in previously treated areas. Recurrence evaluation will occur at the same follow-up periods of the study, i.e., at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months after the end of treatment. Recurrent lesions will be quantified, considering both the absolute and relative number of lesions. These lesions will be monitored and re-treated at the end of the study, unless malignization occurs, in which case they will be treated immediately.

Defined as the reappearance of lesions in previously treated areas. Recurrence evaluation will occur at the same follow-up periods of the study, i.e., at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months after the end of treatment. Recurrent lesions will be quantified, considering both the absolute and relative number of lesions. These lesions will be monitored and re-treated at the end of the study, unless malignization occurs, in which case they will be treated immediately.

If malignization of the lesion occurs during the follow-up period, the gold standard treatment, which consists of surgical intervention, will be applied. Participants will be continuously monitored to prevent the development of squamous cell carcinoma in the treatment area throughout the study. The participation of these participants will be maintained, as the follow-ups consist only of follow-up evaluations. The quantification of malignant lesions will be carried out, considering both the absolute and relative numbers.

If malignization of the lesion occurs during the follow-up period, the gold standard treatment, which consists of surgical intervention, will be applied. Participants will be continuously monitored to prevent the development of squamous cell carcinoma in the treatment area throughout the study. The participation of these participants will be maintained, as the follow-ups consist only of follow-up evaluations. The quantification of malignant lesions will be carried out, considering both the absolute and relative numbers.

If malignization of the lesion occurs during the follow-up period, the gold standard treatment, which consists of surgical intervention, will be applied. Participants will be continuously monitored to prevent the development of squamous cell carcinoma in the treatment area throughout the study. The participation of these participants will be maintained, as the follow-ups consist only of follow-up evaluations. The quantification of malignant lesions will be carried out, considering both the absolute and relative numbers.

The incidence of adverse effects, such as erythema, edema, itching, and peeling, will be monitored through a personal diary filled out by the participant, in which detailed descriptions of any adverse effects will be recorded. This method, as recommended by Jansen et al. (2019), will allow participants to report their symptoms individually. The responsible researcher, a dermatologist specializing in this type of treatment, will offer continuous assistance and follow-up, remaining accessible whenever necessary.

The incidence of adverse effects, such as erythema, edema, itching, and peeling, will be monitored through a personal diary filled out by the participant, in which detailed descriptions of any adverse effects will be recorded. This method, as recommended by Jansen et al. (2019), will allow participants to report their symptoms individually. The responsible researcher, a dermatologist specializing in this type of treatment, will offer continuous assistance and follow-up, remaining accessible whenever necessary.

The incidence of adverse effects, such as erythema, edema, itching, and peeling, will be monitored through a personal diary filled out by the participant, in which detailed descriptions of any adverse effects will be recorded. This method, as recommended by Jansen et al. (2019), will allow participants to report their symptoms individually. The responsible researcher, a dermatologist specializing in this type of treatment, will offer continuous assistance and follow-up, remaining accessible whenever necessary.

Subjective pain assessment will be conducted using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), consisting of a 10 mm line with closed ends, indicating '0' for no pain and '10' for unbearable pain, the worst pain ever felt. Instructions for marking will be consistently provided by the same operator. Each participant will be instructed to mark with a vertical line the point that best reflects the intensity of the pain at the time of evaluation (Heller et al., 2016). These evaluations will be performed weekly until 30 days after treatment, followed by assessments at 3 and 6 months.

Subjective pain assessment will be conducted using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), consisting of a 10 mm line with closed ends, indicating '0' for no pain and '10' for unbearable pain, the worst pain ever felt. Instructions for marking will be consistently provided by the same operator. Each participant will be instructed to mark with a vertical line the point that best reflects the intensity of the pain at the time of evaluation (Heller et al., 2016). These evaluations will be performed weekly until 30 days after treatment, followed by assessments at 3 and 6 months.

Subjective pain assessment will be conducted using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), consisting of a 10 mm line with closed ends, indicating '0' for no pain and '10' for unbearable pain, the worst pain ever felt. Instructions for marking will be consistently provided by the same operator. Each participant will be instructed to mark with a vertical line the point that best reflects the intensity of the pain at the time of evaluation (Heller et al., 2016). These evaluations will be performed weekly until 30 days after treatment, followed by assessments at 3 and 6 months.

Rescue medication will be evaluated by the standardized amount of analgesics ingested (paracetamol). At the beginning of the study, each participant will receive a blister pack of paracetamol®, a drug with a purely analgesic effect, as recommended by Jóźwiak-Bebenista (2014). Participants are instructed to keep the blister pack until the end of the experiment and bring it to each consultation. At the end of the study, the amount of tablets used will be evaluated in each group as a parameter for measuring pain.

Rescue medication will be evaluated by the standardized amount of analgesics ingested (paracetamol). At the beginning of the study, each participant will receive a blister pack of paracetamol®, a drug with a purely analgesic effect, as recommended by Jóźwiak-Bebenista (2014). Participants are instructed to keep the blister pack until the end of the experiment and bring it to each consultation. At the end of the study, the amount of tablets used will be evaluated in each group as a parameter for measuring pain.

Rescue medication will be evaluated by the standardized amount of analgesics ingested (paracetamol). At the beginning of the study, each participant will receive a blister pack of paracetamol®, a drug with a purely analgesic effect, as recommended by Jóźwiak-Bebenista (2014). Participants are instructed to keep the blister pack until the end of the experiment and bring it to each consultation. At the end of the study, the amount of tablets used will be evaluated in each group as a parameter for measuring pain.

This will be conducted at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months, using the Tina Alster et al. (2005) scale. This scale, evaluated by professionals and participants themselves, classifies improvements as minimal (<25%), moderate (25%-50%), significant (51%-75%), and excellent (>75%). These evaluations will provide a comprehensive approach to measure the treatment's effectiveness over time.

This will be conducted at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months, using the Tina Alster et al. (2005) scale. This scale, evaluated by professionals and participants themselves, classifies improvements as minimal (<25%), moderate (25%-50%), significant (51%-75%), and excellent (>75%). These evaluations will provide a comprehensive approach to measure the treatment's effectiveness over time.

This will be conducted at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months, using the Tina Alster et al. (2005) scale. This scale, evaluated by professionals and participants themselves, classifies improvements as minimal (<25%), moderate (25%-50%), significant (51%-75%), and excellent (>75%). These evaluations will provide a comprehensive approach to measure the treatment's effectiveness over time.

Will be assessed through the Actinic Keratosis Quality of Life questionnaire (AKQoL) (Esman et al., 2013) after 6 months and 1 year of treatment. The items will be scored on a standard 4-point Likert scale and summarized into a maximum total score of 32 points. A higher score indicates greater impairment in quality of life. The questionnaire has been translated and validated into Portuguese (Vilhena et al., 2022).

Will be assessed through the Actinic Keratosis Quality of Life questionnaire (AKQoL) (Esman et al., 2013) after 6 months and 1 year of treatment. The items will be scored on a standard 4-point Likert scale and summarized into a maximum total score of 32 points. A higher score indicates greater impairment in quality of life. The questionnaire has been translated and validated into Portuguese (Vilhena et al., 2022).

Will be assessed through the Actinic Keratosis Quality of Life questionnaire (AKQoL) (Esman et al., 2013) after 6 months and 1 year of treatment. The items will be scored on a standard 4-point Likert scale and summarized into a maximum total score of 32 points. A higher score indicates greater impairment in quality of life. The questionnaire has been translated and validated into Portuguese (Vilhena et al., 2022).

Will be assessed through the Actinic Keratosis Quality of Life questionnaire (AKQoL) (Esman et al., 2013) after 6 months and 1 year of treatment. The items will be scored on a standard 4-point Likert scale and summarized into a maximum total score of 32 points. A higher score indicates greater impairment in quality of life. The questionnaire has been translated and validated into Portuguese (Vilhena et al., 2022).

The FACE-Q (Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall) scale consists of nine items assessing satisfaction with overall facial appearance and geometry, using a four-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied to 4 = very satisfied). The questionnaire should be administered before and after aesthetic treatment to measure the patient's perception of symmetry, proportion, and facial freshness. The total score ranges from 9 to 36 and is converted into a 0 to 100 scale, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

The FACE-Q (Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall) scale consists of nine items assessing satisfaction with overall facial appearance and geometry, using a four-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied to 4 = very satisfied). The questionnaire should be administered before and after aesthetic treatment to measure the patient's perception of symmetry, proportion, and facial freshness. The total score ranges from 9 to 36 and is converted into a 0 to 100 scale, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.