Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05559411

MEthods for LOcalization of Different Types of Breast Lesions

In the last decades, the proportion of breast cancer (BC) patients receiving breast-conserving surgery has increased steadily, reaching 70-80% in developed countries. Since positive resection margins are strongly associated with local recurrence risk, the goal of breast surgery is the complete tumor removal and most national and international guidelines recommend re-operation, either in form of re-excision or mastectomy, until clear margins have been reached. Re-operation rates vary widely, with population-based studies reporting a range of 15-35%, and the necessity for a second surgery can lead to increased patient anxiety, a delay in start of adjuvant treatment, worse cosmetic outcome and increased complication rates and costs. Therefore, re-operation rate has been included as a quality indicator in several countries.

Several imaging-guided techniques have been developed to guide removal of non-palpable breast lesions, the oldest one being preoperative wire placement under ultrasound or mammographic guidance, usually followed by radiography or ultrasound of removed tissue. Newer techniques, such as intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS), radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL), radioactive seed localization (RSL), radar reflector-localization (RRL), magnetic seed localization (MSL), and radiofrequency identification (RFID) tags have been introduced as an alternative to wire-guided localization (WGL).

To date, comparative data on the rates of successful lesion removal, negative margins, re-operation rate and patient's comfort depending on the localization technique used are limited. Further, since some of these studies were funded by the manufacturer of the marker examined, a potential bias cannot be excluded. In the vast majority of the available studies, the patient's perspective with regard to discomfort and pain level has not been evaluated.

The aim of the proposed study is to comparatively evaluate different imaging-guided localization methods used for surgical removal of malignant breast lesions with regard to oncological safety and patient-reported outcomes.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck

Lübeck, Germany

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed informed consent form
  • Malignant breast lesion requiring breast-conserving surgery and imaging-guided localization (either DCIS or invasive breast cancer; multiple or bilateral lesions and the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are allowed)
  • Planned surgical removal of the lesion using one or more of the following imaging-guided localization techniques:
  • Wire-guided localization
  • Intraoperative ultrasound
  • Magnetic localization
  • Radioactive seed localization
  • Radioguided Occult Lesion Localization (ROLL)
  • Radar localization
  • Radiofrequency identification (RFID) tag localization
  • Ink/carbon localization
  • Female / male patients ≥ 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients not suitable for surgical treatment
  • Patients requiring mastectomy as first surgery
  • Surgical removal without imaging-guided localization

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of intended target lesion and/or marker removal, independent of margin status on final histopathology (number of study participants with intended target lesion and/or marker removal, divided by the number of all study participants)

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Negative resection margin rates (defined as lesion removal with no invasive or non-invasive carcinoma on ink) at first surgery

    Time frame: 2 years

    Number of study participants with a negative resection margin, divided by the number of all study participants

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Priv.-Doz. Dr. med.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+494515000

Thorsten Kühn, Prof. Dr. med.

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists

Network

Collaborators

  • iBRA-NET

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Non-interventional Multicenter Cohort Study to Evaluate Different Imaging-guided Methods for Localization of Non-palpable Malignant Breast Lesions

Acronym: MELODY

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 29, 2022
Registry last updated
Mar 3, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.