Insespital, University Hospital Bern
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Regula Everts, Prof. Dr. phil.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT06464237
The aim of the Mio-Study is to address the current lack of effective treatment options to reduce cognitive and physical long-term problems in children and adolescents with cancer. Through the use of the Mio-App, cognitive and physical development will be strengthened and metacognitive thinking and awareness will increase.
The Mio-App for children and adolescence with cancer will include a combination of cognitive and physical training tasks and prospective as well as retrospective metacognitive questions. In a randomized controlled trial, the App will be analysed for its efficacy on metacognitive thinking and executive functions. In particular, the investigators are interested in factors that affect the efficacy of the training program such as compliance, age, sex or the presence of fatigue. This study will give insight into the role of metacognition in cognitive and physical performance and will foster the development of children and adolescents with cancer in the long-term.
Interested in participating?
Request Info8 year–16 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Location status: Recruiting
Regula Everts, Prof. Dr. phil.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
In the Mio-Study, the investigators are developing a training app at the interface between neuropsychology and sports science - the Mio-training. The aim of the Mio-training is to strengthen the cognitive and motor development of children and adolescents after cancer in the long-term. The App contains a combination of cognitive and physical training tasks and metacognitive questions to promote knowledge and awareness of one's own thinking. In order to counteract the shortage of skilled workers and the increasing specialization of individual specialist areas, solutions are needed that can be implemented without a lot of staff. From today's perspective, there are hardly any trainings for children and adolescents that show long-term effects on cognitive and motor development and can also be transferred to non-trained tasks in school and everyday life.
The investigators are testing the effectiveness of the Mio-training in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and expect a strengthening of metacognition and core cognitive functions (i.e. executive functions). The Mio-Study will provide information about the role of metacognition in cognitive and physical performance and, ideally, provide evidence for a novel, interdisciplinary rehabilitation strategy for children and adolescents after cancer.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The Mio-App aims to increase metacognitive knowledge, teaches mnemonic skills, trains the working memory capacity and motor skills to reduce cognitive and physical long-term sequelae after cancer during adolescence.
Other names: Mio-Training
Time frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up
Total score of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory over the three timepoints (baseline, immediate followup & 3-months follow-up). Raw values ranging 18-90. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Indices ranging from 0 to 155. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Scaled Scores ranging from 1 to 19. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Scaled Scores ranging from 1 to 19. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Percentile ranks ranging from 0-100. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Percentile ranks ranging from 0-100. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Percentile ranks ranging from 0-100. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up.
Percentile ranks ranging from 0-100. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up.
Short version, Likert scale ranging from 1 to 6. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up.
Stanine rank from 1-9. Higher score mean better outcome.
Time frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up.
5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Regula Everts, Prof. Dr. phil.
CONTACT
Saskia Salzmann, MSc
CONTACT
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Other
Acronym: Mio
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07724535
Cancer, Neoplasms
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05754801
Cancer, Neoplasms
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT05885048
Cancer, Effects of Immunotherapy
Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT05350761
Cancer, Environment
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details