L2 Diabetes Centre, Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong
NCT Number: NCT03959501
The use of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has been associated with increased serum ketone levels. However, most previous studies included subjects who were either insulin or even drug naïve with relatively short duration of diabetes. It is well known that insulin deficiency increases the risk of developing ketoacidosis with SGLT2 inhibitors. Moreover, since the glucose-lowering effect of SGLT2 inhibitors is at its maximum at 3 to 6 months after use, the extent of increase in serum ketone levels and its clinical relevance with chronic use of SGLT2 inhibitors, especially among insulin-treated patients that often have longer duration of diabetes and potentially more insulin deficient than those who are insulin naive, have not been clearly defined. Therefore, the investigators perform this randomised study to evaluate the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on serum ketone levels among Chinese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with insulin therapy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Hong Kong
Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors introduce a novel approach of glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Inhibition of SGLT2 causes glycosuria and lowers blood glucose levels regardless of insulin sensitivity and beta cell function. It has recently been shown that SGLT2 inhibition is efficacious and safe not only in diabetic patients with normal renal function but also in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3a [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 45-59 mL/min/1.73m2]. While the clinical efficacy has been well proven by various randomized controlled trials, the significance of increased serum ketone levels after SGLT2 inhibition, however, remains to be elucidated. Certainly, the risk of ketoacidosis, albeit small, has raised considerable concern among both patients and clinicians. On the other hand, although still controversial at this stage, an alternate fuel hypothesis has emerged that tries to explain the cardiovascular benefits observed with SGLT2 inhibitors.
Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the increased serum ketone levels after SGLT2 inhibition. In patients who are on background insulin therapy, reduced insulin dose, hoping to minimize risk of hypoglycaemia during concomitant use of SGLT2 inhibitors, could increase lipolysis and hepatic ketogenesis. In addition, even among those who are insulin naïve, the use of SGLT2 inhibitors might decrease renal clearance of ketone bodies, or increase ketone production through augmented glucagon to insulin ratio. Recent studies had also demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors shifted substrate utilization from glucose to lipid oxidation, thereby contributing to increased ketones production. In a study involving 9 subjects with T2DM treated with dapagliflozin, plasma ketone levels increased significantly from 0.05 mmol/L to 0.19 mmol/L over 2 weeks. In another study of 66 subjects with T2DM treated with empagliflozin, plasma ketone levels did not rise after a single dose administration but increased statistically from 0.02 mmol/L to 0.06 mmol/L after 4 weeks. Importantly, both studies included subjects who were either insulin or even drug naïve with relatively short duration of diabetes. It is well known that insulin deficiency increases the risk of developing ketoacidosis with SGLT2 inhibitors. Moreover, since the glucose-lowering effect of SGLT2 inhibitors is at its maximum at 3 to 6 months after use, the extent of increase in serum ketone levels and its clinical relevance with chronic use of SGLT2 inhibitors, especially among insulin-treated patients that often have longer duration of diabetes and potentially more insulin deficient than those who are insulin naive, have not been clearly defined. Therefore, the investigators perform this randomised study to evaluate the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on serum ketone levels among Chinese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with insulin therapy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dapagliflozin 10mg daily for 24 weeks
Other names: Forxiga
Sitagliptin 100mg daily for 24 weeks
Other names: Januvia
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change in serum ketone levels before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change in fasting plasma glucose before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change in glycated haemoglobin before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change in body weight before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change in fasting lipid before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change in free fatty acid levels before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change in fasting glucagon levels before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change in homeostasis model assessment 2 steady-state beta-cell function before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
The University of Hong Kong
Other
A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Metabolic Responses of Adding Dapagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin to Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Insulin Therapy (DISTINCTION Study)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04194450
Acid-Base Imbalance, Acidosis
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05263401
Acid-Base Imbalance, Acidosis
Aarhus, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06078683
Acid-Base Imbalance, Acidosis
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05929079
Apnea, Body Weight
Anniston, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details