Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05811845

Mercaptopurine Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Optimize the Maintenance Phase of Childhood ALL

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common hematological malignancy in children (<18 years). The success of pediatric ALL therapy is remarkable but important challenges still need to be faced, including cure rates in specific patients' subsets (e.g.: adolescents and relapsed patients), and short- and long-term chemotherapy-related toxicities. The therapeutic scheme of the Associazione Italiana Emato-oncologia pediatrica (AIEOP) ALL protocols consists in a more intensive and toxic earlier phase (to induce and consolidate remission, about 6 months), followed by a prolonged period of immunosuppression (achieved by self- or parent-administered daily mercaptopurine (MP) and weekly methotrexate (MTX) per os). It is now well established that the length of the maintenance phase (up to 24 months after diagnosis) is as necessary as the early remission induction for sustained event-free survival (EFS). Both MP and MTX can lead to potentially serious complications, including potentially life-threatening myelosuppression and infections. To exert its therapeutic effect, MP requires an intracellular enzymatic conversion into active thionucleotides (TGN) and is thus susceptible to intra- and inter-individual variations in efficacy and toxicity. Patients carrying variants in TPMT and NUTD15 genes are at risk of adverse effects when treated with standard MP doses: these patients are identifiable by pre-emptive genotyping. Recent studies demonstrated that an adequate and constant MP exposure during maintenance is associated with higher therapeutic success. Prescribed MP doses are often changed by physicians to target a white blood cell count (WBC) range of 2.0-3.0 × 109/L during maintenance. In the AIEOP ALL 2009 protocol, patients with lower mean TGN exposure during maintenance showed a trend towards a higher risk of relapse compared to others. Similarly, patients with higher intra-individual variability in TGN over time showed a trend towards a worse outcome. Daily compliance to prescribed MP over time is a challenging issue for patients and may result in less effective therapy. The high intra-individual variability in exposure due to the frequent dose adjustments and the potential lack of patients' adherence to oral MP therapy over time might contribute to the risk of relapse. The aim of this study is to assess through therapeutic drug monitoring of MP if patients' exposure during maintenance is adequate and constant.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common hematological malignancy in children (<18 years). The success of pediatric ALL therapy is remarkable (5 years survival ~90%). However, important challenges still need to be faced, including cure rates in specific patients' subsets (e.g.: adolescents and relapsed patients, 5 years survival ~60-70% and ~40-50%, respectively), and short- and long-term chemotherapy-related toxicities. The therapeutic scheme of the Associazione Italiana Emato-oncologia pediatrica (AIEOP) ALL protocols consists in a more intensive and toxic earlier phase (to induce and consolidate remission, ~ 6 months), followed by a prolonged period of immunosuppression (achieved by self- or parent-administered daily mercaptopurine (MP) and weekly methotrexate (MTX) per os). It is now well established that the length of the maintenance phase (up to 24 months after diagnosis) is as necessary as the early remission induction for sustained event-free survival (EFS). Ideally, the combination of antimetabolites MP and MTX is safe enough to provide the required antileukemic effects with minimal adverse events. However, both drugs can lead to potentially serious complications, including potentially life-threatening myelosuppression and infections. To exert its therapeutic effect, MP requires an intracellular enzymatic conversion into active thionucleotides (TGN) and is thus susceptible to intra- and inter-individual variations in efficacy and toxicity. In particular, patients carrying variants in TPMT and NUTD15 genes are at risk of adverse effects when treated with standard MP doses: these patients are identifiable by pre-emptive genotyping, and pharmacogenetic-based dose adjustment guidelines are already available. Recent studies of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) and of the Nordic Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (NOPHO) demonstrated that an adequate and constant MP exposure during maintenance is associated with higher therapeutic success. Prescribed MP doses are often changed by physicians to target a white blood cell count (WBC) range of 2.0-3.0 × 109/L during maintenance. In the AIEOP ALL 2009 protocol, patients with lower mean TGN exposure during maintenance (below median cut-off of 272.44 pmol/10x108 RBC) showed a trend towards a higher risk of relapse compared to others (11.5% vs 5.5%, respectively). Similarly, patients with higher intra-individual variability in TGN over time (above the 75th percentile of the coefficient of variation (CV)) showed a trend towards a worse outcome (10.3% vs 4.8%). These preliminary data were obtained in 265 ALL patients (age: median (interquartile range): 4.82 (3.03-8.53) years; 58.5% male; follow up from maintenance beginning: 1338 (1377-4162) days; 27 relapsed, TGN measured in 391 blood samples of 209 patients). Daily compliance to prescribed MP over time is a challenging issue for patients and may result in less effective therapy: indeed, the recent use of an electronic device - the medication bottle cap opening (MEMS)- revealed that patients' self-reported MP intake overestimates true intake, in particular in some sociodemographic groups. Adherence is generally poorer in adolescents compared to younger children, likely because drug administration may no more be under strict parents' supervision: this lower compliance can in part contribute to the survival disparity observed between the two age groups. Thus, the high intra-individual variability in exposure due to the frequent dose adjustments and the potential lack of patients' adherence to oral MP therapy over time might contribute to the risk of relapse.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Newly diagnosed ALL
  • Age <18 years at diagnosis
  • Written informed consent given

Exclusion criteria

-

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. To establish the variability of MP systemic exposure (TGN) over time

    Time frame: After 18 months from the start of treatment

    MP metabolites will be evaluated in erythrocytes of peripheral blood according to standardized methods

  2. To establish the correlation between MP systemic exposure (TGN) and absolute neutrophil count to identify the ideal TGN therapeutic range

    Time frame: After 18 months from the start of treatment

    MP metabolites will be evaluated in erythrocytes of peripheral blood according to standardized methods

  3. To establish if TGN levels and intra-individual variability (TGN-CV) could monitor patients' adherence during the long-term maintenance phase

    Time frame: After 18 months from the start of treatment

    MP metabolites will be evaluated in erythrocytes of peripheral blood according to standardized methods

  4. To determine the impact of TGN on EFS

    Time frame: After 18 months from the start of treatment

    MP metabolites will be evaluated in erythrocytes of peripheral blood according to standardized methods

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Marco Rabusin, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+390403785111

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Burlo Garofolo

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Optimizing the Maintenance Phase of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia AIEOP Protocol Through Mercaptopurine Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Proactive Strategies for Adherence

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Apr 13, 2023
Registry last updated
Jun 14, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.