NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Respiratory
Leicester, Leicestershire, LE1 9QP, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT04075331
This is a single-centre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo controlled trial comparing mepolizumab 100mg versus placebo in patients with eosinophilic COPD, started following their index admission to hospital.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Leicester, Leicestershire, LE1 9QP, United Kingdom
Patients admitted to hospital with an exacerbation of COPD are at high risk of readmission, of which a proportion are driven by eosinophilic inflammation. Whilst oral corticosteroids are beneficial in exacerbations, a considerable proportion of patients experience treatment failure, with 50% of patients readmitted within 3 months (www.RCPLondon.ac.uk).
Therapy, such as mepolizumab, reduces eosinophil count and has been shown to reduce exacerbation frequency when given in the stable state in both eosinophilic asthma (Papi et al. 2018) and COPD (Yousef, in press).
The investigators hypothesise that starting mepolizumab at the time of a hospitalisation for an exacerbation of COPD in patients with significant eosinophilia will result in a reduction in readmission to hospital in a high risk population.
Therefore, 238 participants will be recruited over an 18-month period and will be randomised into a 48-week treatment period in which they will receive monthly subcutaneous injections of either 100 mg mepolizumab or placebo. Secondary outcomes will be measured at baseline (week 0), 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks and 48 weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Mepolizumab 100mg subcutaneous injection
Saline solution for subcutaneous injection
Other names: Saline solution
Time frame: Patients were followed up for up to 48 weeks (an absolute maximum of 49 weeks as the 48 week visit had a visit window of +- 1 week).
To evaluate the efficacy of mepolizumab initiated following hospitalisation on future hospital readmission or death (all cause) compared with placebo and standard medical therapy in severe exacerbations of eosinophilic COPD.
Time frame: 0-48 weeks
The number of hospital readmissions (all cause) in total during the 48 (truncated follow-up minimum 24) weeks corresponding to each participant were calculated. Where no hospital admission have occurred a value of zero was derived.
Time frame: 48 weeks
The severity of a COPD exacerbation was deemed as "Moderate" if the participant required treatment with steroids or antibiotics and was not hospitalised .
The number of moderate exacerbations each participant had over the course of 48 (truncated follow-up minimum 24) weeks were calculated.
Time frame: 48 weeks
The severity of a COPD exacerbation was deemed as "Severe" if the participant required hospitalisation.
The number of severe exacerbations each participant had over the course of 48 (truncated follow-up minimum 24) weeks were calculated.
Time frame: 48 weeks
The number of exacerbations each participant had over the course of 48 (truncated follow-up minimum 24) weeks were calculated.
Time frame: Patients were followed up for up to 48 weeks (an absolute maximum of 49 weeks as the 48 week visit had a visit window of +- 1 week).
The time from randomisation to next hospital readmission or death (due to a respiratory cause) is defined as a time to event outcome measured in days. The date of randomisation as well as the date of readmission or death due to respiratory causes (whichever occurs first) were used to calculate time to event. For participants not experiencing an event the time was calculated from randomisation until last known follow-up assessment event-free.
Time frame: Patients were followed up for up to 48 weeks (an absolute maximum of 49 weeks as the 48 week visit had a visit window of +- 1 week).
Treatment failure is defined as the composite of three endpoints: 1. treatment intensification with systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics for respiratory reasons; 2. step-up in hospital care for respiratory reasons including transfer to the intensive care unit or readmission; or 3. all-cause mortality)
Time frame: Patients were followed up for up to 48 weeks (48 week visit had a window of +/- 1 week).
Hospital readmission (respiratory cause). Number of individuals that readmitted during follow up is reported. Hospital readmission due to respiratory cause was analysed as a time to event outcome.
Time frame: Patients were followed up for up to 48 weeks (an absolute maximum of 49 weeks as the 48 week visit had a visit window of +/- 1 week).
The time from randomisation to next hospital readmission (all cause) is defined as a time to event outcome measured in days. The date of randomisation and the date of next hospital readmission following randomisation was used to calculate time to event. Where hospital readmission doesn't occur during follow-up, time was measured until the participant's last known follow-up assessment.
Time frame: Patients were followed up for up to 48 weeks (48 week visit had a window of +/- 1 week).
All cause death. Number of individuals that died during follow up is reported. Death was analysed as a time to event outcome.
Time frame: Patients were followed up for up to 48 weeks (48 week visit had a window of +/- 1 week).
Respiratory cause death. Number of individuals that died during follow up is reported. Death due to respiratory cause was analysed as a time to event outcome.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
This scale measures perceived respiratory disability. Participants rate their grades of breathlessness on a scale of 1 (least) to 5 (worst). The extension divides the grade 5 rating into 'a' (independent) and 'b' (dependent) to establish dependence on others for washing and dressing.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
This 50-item questionnaire measures health status (quality of life) in patients with diseases of airway obstruction. Scores are broken down into three components 'symptoms', 'activity', 'impacts', and the total score is calculated by summing the weights to all the positive responses in each component. For each subscale and the total score, values range from 0 (no impairment) to 100 (maximum impairment). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is a questionnaire for people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). It is designed to measure the impact of COPD on a person's life, and how this changes over time. Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating greater impact of COPD on a patient's life.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
This scale measures mental wellbeing using a 14-item scale. The scoring range for each item is from 1 - 5 and the total score is from 14-70, with higher scores indicating better mental wellbeing.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
This 15-item questionnaire measures dyspnoea during routine daily activities in patients with COPD. It consists of four components: 'Self-care', 'household activities', 'Physical activity' and 'Leisure activities'. The questions in each of the four domains are scored as follows: 0 ("I wouldn't do it anyway"), 1 ("I do not get breathless"), 2 ("I get moderately breathless"), 3 ("I get very breathless"), 4 ("I have given this up") and 5 ("Someone else does this for me"). The LCADL total score sums all individual questions to give values in the range 0 to 75 (inclusive), with the highest score representing maximal disability.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
SPPB ranges from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance). This outcome measures lower extremity function using tasks that are similar to daily activities and it examines 3 areas: static balance, gait speed and getting in and out of a chair. The limitations based on the SPPB cut-off scores are defined as follows: "Severe limitations" if score is between 0-3, "Moderate limitations" if score is between 4-6, "Mild limitations" if score is between 7-9 and "Minimal limitations" if score is between 10-12. Lower scores indicate greater impairment.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
Handgrip strength is defined as a continuous outcome that measures the amount of static force that the hand can squeeze around a dynamometer. This outcome is measured in Kilograms.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
The sputum eosinophil count (percentage) is defined as a continuous outcome that is expressed as a percentage.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
The serum eosinophil count is defined as a continuous outcome that is measured in cells/mL.
Time frame: 48 weeks
Adverse Event Rate in the 48 Weeks of the Trial From First Dose
Time frame: 48 weeks
Serious adverse event rate over 48 week.
Time frame: Over 48 weeks
Blood pressure are defined as continuous outcomes that are measured in mmHg and reported as mean over 48 weeks.
Time frame: Over 48 weeks
Blood pressure are defined as continuous outcomes that are measured in mmHg and reported as mean over 48 weeks.
Time frame: Over 48 weeks
Pre and post dose blood pressure are defined as continuous outcomes that are measured mmHg and reported as mean over 48 weeks.
Time frame: Over 48 weeks
Pre and post dose blood pressure are defined as continuous outcomes that are measured mmHg and reported as mean over 48 weeks.
Time frame: Over 48 weeks
Pre and post dose heart rate are defined as continuous outcomes that are measured beats per minute (bpm) and reported as mean over 48 weeks.
Time frame: Over 48 weeks
Pre and post dose heart rate are defined as continuous outcomes that are measured beats per minute (bpm) and reported as mean over 48 weeks.
Time frame: Over 48 weeks
Pre and post dose temperature are defined as continuous outcomes that are measured in °C and reported as mean over 48 weeks.
Time frame: Over 48 weeks
Pre and post dose temperature are defined as continuous outcomes that are measured in °C and reported as mean over 48 weeks.
University of Leicester
Other
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Mepolizumab Initiated Following Admission to Hospital for a Severe Exacerbation of Eosinophilic COPD
Acronym: COPD-HELP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04252235
COPD, Chronic Disease
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03927820
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06614959
Bronchial Diseases, Bronchitis
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04754490
COPD, Chronic Disease
Abercynon, Wales, United Kingdom
View Trial Details