Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03727464

Memory Priming in General Anesthesia

Memory priming under general anesthesia is a phenomenon of incredible interest in the study of consciousness and unconscious cognitive processing, and for clinical practice.

However results from anesthesiological literature are divergent and methodologies vary.

To overcome these limits, the present study aims at better defining the phenomenon of memory priming under general anesthesia, manipulating as experimental variables both the anesthetic drug used and the stimuli primed.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta

Milan, 20133, Italy

About this study

Some patients may develop serious psychological sequelae after surgical intervention under general anesthesia due to implicit memory formation of intraoperative events.

A number of studies in the field of anesthesiology have tried to better define the phenomenon of implicit memory in general anesthesia, with conflicting results. While some studies demonstrated the existence of unconscious memory formation also under adequate general anesthesia (BIS ranging 40-60), others state that implicit memory formation is possible only during light sedation, and that, therefore, traumatic disorders due to unconscious intraoperative memories are imputable to inadequate anesthesiological intraoperative management. The methodologies used by these studies, however, are very heterogeneous, and often inaccurate from a cognitive point of view. Data from cognitive neuroscience, in fact, demonstrate that different linguistic material, e.g. abstract and concrete words, are processed and retrieved via different networks in the brain. Then, since different anesthetics are known to target different areas of the brain, it is assumable that implicit memory formation is influenced both by the specific drug used and by the type of stimuli primed.

Therefore in this experiment, the investigators aim at testing implicit memory for different word category, abstract vs. concrete words, in patients undergoing either propofol or sevoflurane general anesthesia. Also, a very strict methodology was used both for the construction of the stimuli and the stimulation and testing procedure, in order to maximize the priming effect and exclude the risk of false positive results. The investigators hypothesize that, considering the existing data on propofol and sevoflurane effects on the brain, and the known neural correlates for abstract and concrete word processing, the priming effect would be different for abstract and concrete words between patients under propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • patient undergoing general anesthesia for back surgery
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status classification I or II
  • Italian native speaker
  • right handed (assessed with the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory)
  • not to suffer from memory deficits, hearing impairment or any other medical/psychiatric condition that could affect the memory performance or hearing

Exclusion criteria

  • to develop a postoperative cognitive dysfunction or delirium or any other medical complication that could prevent the memory testing or that could affect memory performance

Treatment and study plan

Abstract priming

Behavioral

Patients were primed with a list of abstract during their general anesthesia

Concrete priming

Behavioral

Patients were primed with a list of concrete during their general anesthesia

Controls

Behavioral

Patients did not receive any specific stimulation with words during their general anesthesia

Propofol

Drug

Propofol general anesthesia

Sevoflurane

Drug

Sevoflurane general anesthesia

Primary outcomes

  1. Implicit score

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Implicit memory is tested through a word stem completion test, in which the participant has to complete a three-letter stem with the first word that comes to mind. The completion test comprises both target stems (stems of word primed intra-operatively) and foils. The number of correct completions of target stems and foils is recorded as target and non target hits. The implicit score is then calculated as (target hits - nontarget hits)/total target stimuli. The score can therefore range (absolute values) from -1 to +1, where a positive score indicates memory priming.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Explicit recall of intraoperative words

    Time frame: before discharge from the Recovery Room and at 24 hours

    The number of intraoperative primed words that the patient is able to recall without any cue

  2. Explicit recall of intraoperative events

    Time frame: before discharge from the Recovery Room and at 24 hours

    The explicit recall of intraoperative events assessed with the Brice Interview

  3. Target hits

    Time frame: 24 hours

    The number of correct stem completions (hits) with target words (i.e. words heard intraoperatively)

  4. Nontarget hits

    Time frame: 24 hours

    The number of correct stem completions (hits) with nontarget words (i.e. words not heard intraoperatively)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Milano Bicocca

Registry information

Official study title

Memory Priming for Abstract and Concrete Words in General BIS Guided Propofol vs. Sevoflurane Anesthesia

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Nov 1, 2018
Registry last updated
Sep 6, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.