Children Hospital - MUHC
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada
NCT Number: NCT03779672
This study will evaluate the potential benefit of memantine hydrochloride as treatment for children with epileptic encephalopathy using a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over design.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me6 year–18 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada
Memantine, a drug approved for Alzheimer's dementia, exerts its therapeutic effect through its action as a low to moderate affinity non-competitive (open channel) N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R) antagonist, which binds preferentially to the NMDA receptor-operated cation channels. It blocks the effects of persistently elevated levels of glutamate that may lead to neuronal dysfunction. Memantine may also have anti-inflammatory effects. Memantine has been used off-label in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder, to improve the cognitive impairment.
Epileptic encephalopathy, as well as other forms of epilepsy, may occur as a result of multiple etiologies, including genetic and inflammatory pathologies. Ion channels were long considered to be implicated in genetic epilepsy. Indeed one of the many possible causes of epilepsy is NMDA receptor dysfunction.
In the present study, the investigators plan to investigate the potential benefit of memantine as a treatment for epileptic encephalopathy. A double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over design will be used, with participants receiving 6 weeks of memantine and 6 weeks of placebo, with a 2-week washout period in between.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Placebo
OR Placebo
Memantine
Other names: PrSANDOZ MEMANTINE FCT10 mg Drug Identification Number (DIN) 02375532
Time frame: Week 6 or 14
"Responder" defined as having ≥ 2 of (1) EEG improvement, (2) decreased seizure frequency, (3) cognitive improvement, (4) caregiver impression of improvement, (5) Serum Inflammatory Markers Change. These outcomes are individually defined in detail in the secondary outcomes below.
Description of the primary variable(s) The primary efficacy endpoint is the composite cluster of the first occurrence, over the duration of study (randomization to study end date inclusive), of the EE improvement.
Time frame: Week 6 or 14
"Responder" defined as having ≥ 2 of (1) EEG improvement, (2) decreased seizure frequency, (3) cognitive improvement, (4) caregiver impression of improvement, (5) Serum Inflammatory Markers Change. These outcomes are individually defined in detail in the secondary outcomes below.
Description of the primary variable(s) The primary efficacy endpoint is the composite cluster of the first occurrence, over the duration of study (randomization to study end date inclusive), of the EE improvement.
Time frame: Week 6 or 14
EEG improvement EEG Change: EEG is not a quantitative measure, and there are many possible different patterns that may be seen in epileptic encephalopathy. In general, improvement usually involves (a) background activity changing to more closely resemble the expected background activity for the patient's age, and/or (b) decrease in frequency of epileptiform activity. The electroencephalographer will compare EEGs to the baseline study, and will score as (1) Interval worsening, (2) No significant change, or (3) Interval improvement.
We will be assessing all the frequencies usually assessed on a routine EEG (delta, theta, alpha and beta). The frequency range assessed will be 1-70 Hz.
Time frame: Week 6 or 14
EEG Change: EEG is not a quantitative measure, and there are many possible different patterns that may be seen in epileptic encephalopathy. In general, improvement usually involves (a) background activity changing to more closely resemble the expected background activity for the patient's age, and/or (b) decrease in frequency of epileptiform activity. The electroencephalographer will compare EEGs to the baseline study, and will score as (1) Interval worsening, (2) No significant change, or (3) Interval improvement.
EEG improvement We will be assessing all the frequencies usually assessed on a routine EEG (delta, theta, alpha and beta). The frequency range assessed will be 1-70 Hz.
Time frame: Week 6 or 14
Reduction in seizure frequency Seizure Frequency Change: Participants will keep seizure diaries throughout the study. If the frequency of seizures decreases by > 50% from the baseline frequency, they will be classified as having a significant reduction in seizure frequency.
Time frame: Week 6 or 14
Reduction in seizure frequency Seizure Frequency Change: Participants will keep seizure diaries throughout the study. If the frequency of seizures decreases by > 50% from the baseline frequency, they will be classified as having a significant reduction in seizure frequency.
Time frame: Week 6 or 14
Definite improvement in cognitive functioning by neuropsychological testing Cognitive Cognitive Function Change: Participants will see a neuropsychologist at baseline and at the conclusion of each treatment period. The precise testing used will be to the discretion of the neuropsychologist, based on the participant's cognitive capabilities. The neuropsychologist will compare to the baseline assessment and determine if there has been a significant change, based on her experience using these testing protocols in the given age range. The neuropsychologist will score as (1) Interval worsening, (2) No significant change, or (3) Interval improvement.
Time frame: Week 6 or 14
Definite improvement in cognitive functioning by neuropsychological testing Cognitive Cognitive Function Change: Participants will see a neuropsychologist at baseline and at the conclusion of each treatment period. The precise testing used will be to the discretion of the neuropsychologist, based on the participant's cognitive capabilities. The neuropsychologist will compare to the baseline assessment and determine if there has been a significant change, based on her experience using these testing protocols in the given age range. The neuropsychologist will score as (1) Interval worsening, (2) No significant change, or (3) Interval improvement.
Time frame: Week 6 or 14
Subjective perception of improvement by parents Caregiver Impression of Change: At the conclusion of each treatment period, caregivers will be asked the following question: "Compared to before the study, do you feel the overall functioning of your child (including seizure control, development and quality of life) is (1) Improved, (2) No Change, or (3) Worsened.
Time frame: Week 6 or 14
Subjective perception of improvement by parents Caregiver Impression of Change: At the conclusion of each treatment period, caregivers will be asked the following question: "Compared to before the study, do you feel the overall functioning of your child (including seizure control, development and quality of life) is (1) Improved, (2) No Change, or (3) Worsened.
Time frame: Week 6 or 14
Changes in serum inflammation Serum inflammatory markers: C Reactive Protein (CRP), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). CRP and ESR are commonly-used clinical measures of inflammation, and IL-6 was found to be elevated in some epileptic encephalopathies in one study (van den Munckhof et al., 2016). Levels will be compared following each treatment period, to the baseline value.
Time frame: Week 6 or 14
Changes in serum inflammation Serum inflammatory markers: C Reactive Protein (CRP), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). CRP and ESR are commonly-used clinical measures of inflammation, and IL-6 was found to be elevated in some epileptic encephalopathies in one study (van den Munckhof et al., 2016). Levels will be compared following each treatment period, to the baseline value.
Time frame: Week 16
Participants will be asked at all visits to report any possible adverse events, including those requiring emergent treatment. Adverse events will be classified as "clinically significant" or "not clinically significant" with respect to the likelihood that they are related to use of the investigational drug. The frequency of adverse events will be determined during the period receiving memantine and the period receiving placebo.
Kenneth Myers, MD
Other
Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial of Memantine Hydrochloride for the Treatment of Childhood-onset Epileptic Encephalopathies
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06500260
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03678753
Epilepsy, Idiopathic Generalized, Nervous System Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04557085
Focal Seizure, Nervous System Diseases
Shanghai, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05614063
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Mobile, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details