Centre for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
NCT Number: NCT01382108
The purpose of this study is to look at both the meibomian glands and the tear film using a new clinical instrument marketed in Canada which was recently acquired by the Centre for Contact Lens Research. These will be compared between two groups of individuals, one group with visible meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and one group of individuals with normal meibomian gland appearance. The hypothesis is that there will be a difference between normal individuals and individuals with MGD with respect to the appearance of the meibomian glands and certain tear film attributes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me17 year–70 year
All sexes
Observational
Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a common clinical condition and a major cause of evaporative dry eye with associated discomfort, visual disturbance and contact lens intolerance. In MGD, meibum is often abnormal, progressively changing in color from clear to yellow and in consistency from liquid to thick and toothpaste-like. Evaluation of the meibomian glands (MG) and lipid layer is vital. In a typical clinical setting, lid and lid margin evaluation is often performed via slitlamp biomicroscopy; however, the structure of the meibomian glands is often not clearly visualized when a slit lamp is used in isolation. Trans-illumination of the lids is necessary to clearly view these glands.
To date, infrared meibography has been the only method available for the assessment of meibomian gland structure. It is primarily regarded as a laboratory-specific procedure for meibomian gland drop out assessment in people suffering from MGD. Recently, the Keratograph 4 was released by OCULUS (Wetzlar, Germany). In addition to corneal and contact lens assessment features, the Keratograph 4 offers a tear film (TF) scan module able to objectively assess tear break-up time (TBUT) with a colour coded map highlighting the regions of tear break up. High-resolution images of tear meniscus can also be obtained and used for subjective assessment of tear meniscus height (TMH) with the help of built-in software. Preliminary research at the Centre for Contact Lens Research has demonstrated its ability to capture meibography images of the upper and lower lids.
The objectives of this study are to collect meibography, TBUT and TMH data using the Keratograph 4 in normal participants (no MGD) and participants with MGD and to compare these between the two groups and before and after the use of a meibomian gland evaluator. The primary outcome variables are meibography images, TBUT and TMH.
The study hypothesis is that here will be a difference between normal participants and participants with MGD, with respect to meibography images (MG drop out), TBUT measurements (area and time of break up) and TMH measurements.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Grade 0 = normal, clear oil expressed (i.e., cooking oil appearance) Grade 1= opaque, diffusely turbid, normal viscosity Grade 2 = opaque, increased viscosity Grade 3 = inspissated (i.e., toothpaste-like appearance) or no expressed material Clinical criteria defining MGD dry eye for study inclusion (Group 2):
Grade 0 = normal, clear oil expressed (i.e., cooking oil appearance) Grade 1 = opaque, diffusely turbid, normal viscosity Grade 2 = opaque, increased viscosity Grade 3 = inspissated (i.e., toothpaste-like appearance) or no expressed material
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Before and after the use of a meibomian gland evaluator. Assessments will be separated by a period of at least 10 minutes.
Assessments will be made in normal participants (no MGD) and participants with MGD and compared between the two groups at baseline and after the use of a meibomian gland evaluator.
The meibomium gland dropout score subjective grading scale:
0 = no loss of mebomium glands
Time frame: Before and after the use of a meibomian gland evaluator. Assessments will be separated by a period of at least 10 minutes.
Measurements will be made in normal participants (no MGD) and participants with MGD and compared between the two groups at baseline and after the use of a meibomian gland evaluator.
Time frame: Before and after the use of a meibomian gland evaluator. Assessments will be separated by a period of at least 10 minutes.
Assessments will be made in normal participants (no MGD) and participants with MGD and compared between the two groups at baseline and after the use of a meibomian gland evaluator.
University of Waterloo
Other
Acronym: KITCHENER
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06483750
Cataract Senile, Dry Eye Disease
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05577910
Dry Eye Syndromes, Eye Diseases
Kowloon, Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT06004895
Dry Eye Syndromes, Eye Diseases
Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT04425551
Cardiovascular Diseases, Dry Eye
Athens, Greece
View Trial Details