Medtronic's MOSAIC Bioprosthesis Versus Baxter Carpentier-Edwards SAV Porcine Valve

The bioprostheses (xenografts) to be used in this study are third generation valves derived from porcine aortic valves. The chief advantage over mechanical prostheses is that they do not require lifelong anticoagulation with warfarin with its attendant risks of haemorrhage if the patient becomes over anticoagulated, or thromboembolism if anticoagulation is inadequate. However their disadvantage is that they are prone to calcification and mechanical failure over time. Because of this, bioprosthetic valves are usually reserved for older patients in whom the chance of repeat surgery is reduced.

The Medtronic Mosaic stented bioprosthesis has been recently introduced. The Mosaic bioprosthesis utilizes Physiological Fixation (root fixation with zero pressure differential across the valve leaflets). This allows valves to maintain their natural leaflet structure and root geometry. The Mosaic bioprosthesis uses the AOA anti-mineralisation treatment. Developed in collaboration with Biomedical Design, Inc., AOA has been shown in multiple animal studies to be an effective treatment in preventing leaflet calcification.

Baxter currently produces the Carpentier Edwards SAV porcine bioprosthesis that has abundant long-term follow-up data and is widely used. Low pressure fixation (less than 1.5mmHg) and anti-mineralisation treatment with FET 80TM are used in its preparation. The stent (which supports the cusps) has been designed to allow for the wider opening angle of the softer leaflets.

These features aim to improve on the haemodynamic performance of earlier generation valves and offer the potential for increased durability. Early results look promising with excellent haemodynamic parameters and remarkably low rates of structural failure.

If zero pressure fixation and anti-mineralisation treatment can be shown to increase the longevity of the bioprosthetic valve, the age criteria for implantation will undoubtedly be lowered allowing a younger cohort of patients to benefit from anticoagulation-free therapy and freedom from associated morbidities.

Inclusion criteria

• Patients who require isolated or combined aortic or mitral valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafting
• Patients requesting anticoagulation-free therapy
• Patients who are able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

• Concomitant procedures other than coronary artery bypass grafting
• Presence of illness other than valve disease that would substantially increase the likelihood of death within one year
• Patients unlikely to be available for long term follow-up activities
• Patients indicated for receiving a mechanical prosthesis
• Patients refusing or not able to provide informed consent