Robot-assisted laparoscopy
ProcedureThe experimental procedure corresponds to robot-assisted laparoscopy.
NCT Number: NCT06348719
The standard treatment for endometrial cancer is surgery, as long as the stage of the disease and the patient's condition allow. It consists of hysterectomy (TSH) with bilateral adnexectomy. The recommended surgical approach is the minimally invasive or laparoscopic route, whose oncological safety has been demonstrated by the LAP2 study.
Since 2010 and the arrival of robotic surgery in gynaecology, the robot-assisted laparoscopic approach has gradually been used for endometrial cancer Hysterectomy.
Several studies have suggested that the cost and effectiveness of laparoscopy may vary according to the age and body mass index of the patient.
The investigators therefore hypothesise that robot-assisted laparoscopy may be more efficient than conventional laparoscopy for endometrial cancer hysterectomy in the context of an advanced learning curve in France.
The investigators therefore hypothesise that robot-assisted laparoscopy could be more efficient than conventional laparoscopy for endometrial cancer hysterectomy in the context of an advanced learning curve in France. The investigators will also test the efficiency of the surgical technique as a function of age and Body mass Index.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
CHU de Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Lille, France
As part of this project, the investigators are proposing an original approach by combining a randomized controlled trial with a prospective observational cohort and a retrospective cohort.
This research will therefore consist of 3 complementary studies :
A multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial (ratio 1:1) comparing two groups:
Budget impact analysis
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Randomized Study:
Inclusion criteria
Non Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria
Prospective cohort:
Inclusion criteria
Non Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria
Retrospective cohort:
Inclusion criteria
Non Inclusion Criteria:
Surgeons :
Inclusion criteria
Non- inclusion Criteria:
None
First surgical assistance in the field :
Inclusion criteria
Non- inclusion Criteria:
None
The experimental procedure corresponds to robot-assisted laparoscopy.
The "control" procedure corresponds to conventional laparoscopy.
A prospective cohort of patients will be set up to support the randomized controlled trial. Patients will be offered participation in this cohort if the center is unable to participate in the randomized trial (i.e., does not have a robot, or does not have a laparoscopic column with fluorescence), if the patient refuses randomization in the randomized controlled trial, if the surgeon refuses to randomize the patient, or if the surgeon does not meet the learning curve criteria required for robotic surgery. These patients will be followed in exactly the same way as patients included in the randomized controlled trial, once their consent has been obtained.
Retrospective data collection from the medical records of all patients who underwent hysterectomy for low- or intermediate-risk endometrial cancer during the inclusion period at a participating center and who were not included in the randomized controlled trial or prospective cohort; up to a limit of 1000 inclusions. For this retrospective cohort, only data concerning initial age, BMI, histological type of cancer and surgical approach used will be collected.
information and consent
Randomization
Collection of socio-demographic, clinical, biological, imaging and histopathological data, treatment decision, recurrence
Surgical data collection at Day 0
Biological data collection at Day 1
Collection of histological data from the surgical specimen et Day 42
Phone calls at Day 1, Day 3,Day 7,Day14,Day 21 , Month 3
Pain assessment at day 1 , Day 3,Day 7,Day14,Day 21 , Month 3
Collect of data on non-reimbursed transport at Day 3,Day 7,Day14,Day 21 , day 42, Month 3, month 6
Collect of everyday help at inclusion, Day 3,Day 7,Day14,Day 21 , day 42, Month 3, month 6
Collection of the business resumption date at Day 3,Day 7,Day14,Day 21 , day 42, Month 3, month 6
SF36 questionnaire at inclusion, Day 3,Day 7,Day14,Day 21 , day 42, month 6
Questionnaire EQ5D-5L at day 1, Day 3,Day 7,Day14,Day 21 , day 42, month 3, month 6
FIGO Stadium at inclusion and Day 42
Collection of treatments (analgesics and anticoagulants up to J42, complication-related treatments, etc.) at day 1, Day 3,Day 7,Day14,Day 21 , day 42, month 3, month 6
Collection of adjuvant treatments at month 6
Recording of any complications, emergency room visits/unscheduled consultations, additional work stoppages to the initial one at Day 3,Day 7,Day14,Day 21 , day 42, month 3, month 6
Collection of data on age, baseline, BMI, histological type of cancer and surgical approach used
Time frame: 6 weeks post-operatively
Incremental cost-utility ratio expressed in terms of costs / QALY (Quality-Adjusted Life-Year) gained with robot-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy in patients undergoing THR for low-risk or intermediate-risk endometrial carcinoma (i. e ; endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium grade 1 or 2 and FIGO stage 1 (FIGO 2023 classification)) in pre-therapeutic MRI) following a collective perspective at 6 weeks post-operatively.
Time frame: Day 0
Operating time
Time frame: month 6
Conversion rate
Time frame: Day 0
Rate and nature of intraoperative complications
Time frame: Day 42
Post-operative complication rate and nature at D42 (Clavien-Dindo classification)
Time frame: Month 6
Post-operative complication rate and nature at M6 (Clavien-Dindo classification)
Time frame: Day 0
Volume of intraoperative blood loss
Time frame: Day 3
Number of Red Blood Cell Concentrate(s) (RBC), Fresh Frozen Plasma(s) (FFP), and Platelet Concentrate(s) (PC) transfused during hospital stay
Time frame: 6 Hours after surgery
Visual analogue evaluation (VAS) of pain 6h after surgery. Scale from 0 to 10. VAS between 1 and 3: pain of mild intensity VAS between 3 and 5: pain of moderate intensity VAS between 5 and 7: intense pain VAS greater than 7: very intense pain
Time frame: 24 Hours after surgery
Visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain 24h after surgery. Scale from 0 to 10. VAS between 1 and 3: pain of mild intensity VAS between 3 and 5: pain of moderate intensity VAS between 5 and 7: intense pain VAS greater than 7: very intense pain
Time frame: Day 3
Visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain D3 after surgery. Scale from 0 to 10. VAS between 1 and 3: pain of mild intensity VAS between 3 and 5: pain of moderate intensity VAS between 5 and 7: intense pain VAS greater than 7: very intense pain
Time frame: Day 1
Analgesic consumption at D1 after surgery
Time frame: Day 3
Analgesic consumption at D3 after surgery
Time frame: Day 7
Analgesic consumption at D7 after surgery
Time frame: Day 14
Analgesic consumption at D14 after surgery
Time frame: Day 21
Analgesic consumption at D21 after surgery
Time frame: Day 42
Analgesic consumption at D42 after surgery
Time frame: Day 0
EQ-5D-5L (Euroquol - 5 Dimensions - 5 levels) at inclusion after surgery. Score from 0 to 1 - 0 = deceased
1 = in perfect health
Time frame: Day 1
EQ-5D-5L (Euroquol - 5 Dimensions - 5 levels) at D1 after surgery. Score from 0 to 1. 0 = deceased
1 = in perfect health
Time frame: Day 3
EQ-5D-5L (Euroquol - 5 Dimensions - 5 levels) at D3 after surgery. Score from 0 to 1. 0 = deceased
1 = in perfect health
Time frame: Day 7
EQ-5D-5L (Euroquol - 5 Dimensions - 5 levels) at D7 after surgery. Score from 0 to 1. 0 = deceased
1 = in perfect health
Time frame: Day 14
EQ-5D-5L (Euroquol - 5 Dimensions - 5 levels) at D14 after surgery. Score from 0 to 1. 0 = deceased
1 = in perfect health
Time frame: Day 21
EQ-5D-5L (Euroquol - 5 Dimensions - 5 levels) at D21 after surgery. Score from 0 to 1. 0 = deceased
1 = in perfect health
Time frame: Day 42
EQ-5D-5L (Euroquol - 5 Dimensions - 5 levels) at D42 after surgery. Score from 0 to 1. 0 = deceased
1 = in perfect health
Time frame: Month 3
EQ-5D-5L (Euroquol - 5 Dimensions - 5 levels) at M3 after surgery. Score from 0 to 1. 0 = deceased
1 = in perfect health
Time frame: Month 6
EQ-5D-5L (Euroquol - 5 Dimensions - 5 levels) at M6 after surgery. Score from 0 to 1 0 = deceased
1 = in perfect health
Time frame: Day 0
SF-36 (Short Form 36) at baseline after surgery. Score from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Day 3
SF-36 (Short Form 36) at D3 after surgery. Score from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Day 7
SF-36 (Short Form 36) at D7 after surgery. Score from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Day 42
SF-36 (Short Form 36) at D42 after surgery. Score from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Month 6
SF-36 (Short Form 36) at M6 after surgery. Score from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Day 42
Consumption of care between surgery and D42 and M6: average length of hospital stay in days
Time frame: Day 42
Consumption of care between surgery and D42 and M6: average of number of re-hospitalizations
Time frame: Day 42
Consumption of care between surgery and D42 and M6: average of emergency room visits
Time frame: Day 42
Consumption of care between surgery and D42 and M6: average of number of gynecologist consultations
Time frame: Day 42
Consumption of care between surgery and D42 and M6: quantity of consumption of analgesic(s) up to D42
Time frame: Day 42
Consumption of care between surgery and D42 and M6: quantity of consumption of anticoagulant(s) up to D42
Time frame: Day 42
Consumption of care between surgery and D42 and M6: average of number of work stoppage(s).
Time frame: Month 6
Time to initiate adjuvant treatment when indicated (radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy and/or chemotherapy).
Time frame: Month 6
Patient alive or not at 6 months
Time frame: Day 3
Gas recovery time
Time frame: Day 42
Incremental cost-utility ratio expressed as costs/QALYs gained with robot-assisted laparoscopy vs. laparoscopy from a collective perspective at D42, stratified by age<or≥ at 75 and BMI<or≥ at 30 kg/m2,
Time frame: Month 6
Incremental cost-utility ratio expressed as costs/QALYs gained with robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparoscopy from a collective perspective at M6.
Time frame: Month 36
Number of patients who underwent each approach (laparotomy, conventional laparoscopy, robotic-assisted laparoscopy or vaginal approach) among patients operated on for low- or intermediate-risk endometrial cancer at participating centers during the inclusion period.
Time frame: Month 36
QALYs and average costs in relation to care consumption of patients included in the prospective cohort and in the randomized controlled trial according to the approach used and subgroups defined by age (<or≥ to 75 years) and BMI <or≥ to 30 kg/m2).
Time frame: Month 36
Surgical teams' perception of the benefits and limitations of robotic surgery in this indication, as well as perceived barriers and levers to the deployment of robot-assisted surgery in low- or intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. Use of semi directiv interview, qualitative method
Time frame: Day 0
Assessment of the surgeon's physical stress during and at the end of the operation using the Borg scale
Time frame: Day 0
Assessment of the surgeon's physical stress at the end of the operation using the NASA-TLX
Time frame: Day 0
Assessment of the First surgical assistant in the operating room's physical stress at the end of the operation using the NASA-TLX
Time frame: Day 0
Assessment of the First surgical assistant in the operating room's physical stress during and at the end of the operation using the Borg-Scale.
On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 representing no effort and 10 representing very intense (near-maximum) effort, how would you rate your current perception of the effort required for the surgical procedure? (0: No effort; 1: Very, very easy; 2: Very easy; 3: Easy; 4: Moderate effort; 5: Average; 6: A little hard; 7: Hard; 8: Very hard; 9: Very, very hard; 10: Maximum) Legs; Back; Neck; Left shoulder; Right shoulder; Left forearm; Right forearm; Left wrist; Right wrist; Left hand; Right hand; Left fingers; Right fingers
Time frame: Month 36
Total annual costs of the foreseeable spread of robot-assisted surgery for low-risk or intermediate-risk endometrial cancer and of alternative management, with gradual generalization over a 5-year period, based on the outlook for the French healthcare system.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Rennes University Hospital
Other
Medico-economic Evaluation of Robot-assisted Laparoscopy Compared With Conventional Laparoscopy in Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer: Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
Acronym: ROBOT-ECO-GYN
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.