Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03955965

Medication Reconciliation in an Emergency Department: How to Prioritize Patients ?

Medication reconciliation has proven its efficiency in improving patients' care, especially for emergency patients.

This study aimed to identify risk factors of unintended medication discrepancies (UMD) in an emergency department. Secondary objectives were to identify the number and type of UMD, correction rate of UMD and the impact of emergency department organisation on UMD.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014, France

About this study

Emergency patients are at high risk of medication errors, for different reasons: emergency admission, patients who don't know their at-home treatment (polymedicated, cognitive disorders, etc) and who don't have their medical prescriptions available.

Medication reconciliation has proven its efficiency in improving patients' care, especially for emergency patients. However, prioritization is essential to ensure a better efficiency of pharmaceutical resources.

In our center, a pharmacy resident has been assigned to medication reconciliation in the emergency department since November 2017, in collaboration with a clinical pharmacist. Every morning, 3 to 4 patients benefit from medication reconciliation (patients who will be transfered to another unit within our hospital).

The main objective was to identify risk factors of unintended medication discrepancies (UMD) in order to prioritize patients who will benefit from this newly implemented activity.

Secondary objectives were to identify the number and type of UMD, correction rate of UMD and the impact of emergency department organisation on UMD.

All patients who beneficiated from medication reconciliation in the emergency department between November 2017 and April 2018 were included. Were not included patients with a medication reconciliation performed but transfered to another hospital right after the emergency department visit.

This was a retrospective, monocentric, observational study. Number of patients required was 200. Variables collected were:

  • demographics (age, sex, lifestyle, comorbidities),
  • emergency care variables (date and time of medical care beginning, ambulance arrival, adressing type, medical prescriptions availability, main diagnosis, date and hour of medical prescriptions in the emergency department, prescriber (pharmacy/doctor), destination unit of patients)
  • organizational variables (number of daily emergency visits, number of patients hospitalized within the emergency department),
  • medical notes information on at-home treatment (number of missing information, of incorrect information, number of prescriptions in at-home treatment)
  • medication reconciliation variables (date of medication reconciliation, number of sources of information needed, number of actual prescriptions in at-home treatment, number of intended medication discrepancies, number and type of UMD, time needed for medication reconciliation).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients who beneficiated from medication reconciliation in the emergency department between November 2017 and April 2018

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients transfered to another hospital right after the emergency department visit

Treatment and study plan

Medication reconciliation

Other

No intervention was performed other than collecting data on patients' medical files

Primary outcomes

  1. Variables influencing the number of UMD in the emergency department

    Time frame: Nov2017-Apr2018

    Variation of the number of UMD for each variable was measured to identify the impact of each factor on medication errors (linear regression). Variables measured were the variables described in the protocol section.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number and type of UMD

    Time frame: Nov2017-Apr2018

  2. Correction rate of UMD

    Time frame: Nov2017-Apr2018

  3. Impact of organizational variables on the number of UMD

    Time frame: Nov2017-Apr2018

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

Other

Registry information

Official study title

OPTICONCIL: Implementation of Medication Reconciliation Process in an Emergency Department : Which Patients Should be Prioritized and How to Optimize Patients' Therapeutics?

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
May 20, 2019
Registry last updated
May 20, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.