Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05584228

Medical Treatment Versus Surgery in Stricturing Small Bowel Crohn's Disease

The objective of the SMART trial is to compare a combination therapy using azathioprine and subcutaneous infliximab versus ileocecal resection in patients with symptomatic small bowel Crohn's disease.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, disabling and destructive inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) leading to progressive and cumulative bowel damage, including fistulas and strictures. Strictures are defined as intestinal luminal narrowing and can lead to obstructive symptoms in the medium-to-long term. Symptomatic strictures significantly impair patient's quality of life by the presence of obstructive symptoms such as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension, and dietary restrictions leading to malnutrition. Strictures can appear anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract, but affect most commonly the terminal ileum. Epidemiological studies indicate that more than 40% of patients with ileal CD will develop strictures.

However, treatment strategies are not well-defined in this indication. Most patients undergo surgery but recent observations indicate that a medical treatment by anti-TNF may be considered in stricturing CD. The European Crohn's Colitis Organization recommends that "ileocecal CD with obstructive symptoms, but no significant evidence of active inflammation, should be treated by surgery". However, the lack of inflammation is difficult to demonstrate and does not predict the extent of fibrosis, and inflammation and fibrosis are often associated. Thus, there is a need for better defining therapeutic strategies.

The objective of the SMART trial is to compare for the first time medical versus surgical approaches in stricturing CD. Indeed, up to date, no randomized controlled trial has been conducted to compare medical treatment alone versus surgery in patients with symptomatic stricturing CD. The hypothesis is that medical treatment by a combination therapy using infliximab and azathioprine is non-inferior to surgical resection in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 1 year, with the advantage of being conservative as regards the high rates of post-operative recurrence with the subsequent risk of small bowel syndrome, as well as highly more acceptable by patients, especially since infliximab is now available as a biosimilar in a subcutaneous formulation, which should also improve the cost-effectiveness of the medical strategy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 70 years
  • Male or female
  • Documented small bowel CD with intestinal stricture(s) identified on CT, MRI or endoscopy, AND responsible for obstructive symptoms
  • CREOLE score > 2

Exclusion criteria

  • Adults under guardianship, safeguard justice or trusteeship
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding female
  • Acute bowel obstruction requiring urgent surgical intervention
  • Suspected or confirmed gastrointestinal perforation
  • Concurrent active perianal sepsis
  • Internal fistulizing disease in association with strictures
  • Colonic stenosis and/or colonic active disease at screening endoscopy
  • Contra-indication to surgery, general anesthesia, anti-TNF, thiopurines
  • Use of corticosteroids (prednisolone > 20 mg daily or equivalent) within 4 weeks prior to visit V0
  • Treatment with any biologics within 8 weeks before visit V0
  • Presence of a stoma
  • HIV/HCV/HBV infection

Treatment and study plan

Azathioprine + infliximab

Drug

Combination therapy using 2-2.5 mg/kg oral azathioprine plus subcutaneous infliximab

Other names: Imurel, Remsima

Intestinal resection

Procedure

Ileocolonic or small bowel resection

Primary outcomes

  1. IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) - related quality of life

    Time frame: 12 months

    Mean total inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ - Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire ) score.

    The total score ranges from 32 to 224, the higher the score the better the quality of life.

Secondary outcomes

  1. IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) -related quality of life

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 18 and 24 months

    Mean total inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ - Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire ) score.

    The total score ranges from 32 to 224, the higher the score the better the quality of life.

  2. Endoscopic remission

    Time frame: 6 months

    Proportion of patients achieving endoscopic remission at month 6 (SES-CD < 2 in case of medical treatment or Rutgeerts score < i,2 in case of resection)

  3. Obstructive symptoms

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months

    Mean total score of CDOS (CROHN'S DISEASE OBSTRUCTIVE SCORE ) Scale frome 0 to 6. 0 is the best outcome.

  4. Clinical activity

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months

    Mean total score of CDAI (CROHN'S DISEASE ACTIVITY INDEX ) Scale from 0 to 1100. 0 is the best outcome.

  5. inflammatory biomarkers (fecal calprotectin)

    Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months

    Mean values of fecal calprotectin

  6. inflammatory biomarkers ( C-reactive protein [CRP])

    Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months

    Mean values of CRP

  7. imaging parameters

    Time frame: 12 months

    Proportion of patients with an improvement in wall thickening, contrast enhancement, T2-signal increase, diffusion weighted-signal increase and length of pathological segment at month 12 as compared to screening imaging (MRI) by physician global assessment

  8. treatment failures

    Time frame: 12 and 24 months

    Proportion of patients without any treatment failures

  9. patient-reported outcomes (disability)

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months

    Mean total score of IBD-DI (INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE DISABILITY INDEX ) Score from 0 to 100. 0 is the best outcome (no disability)

  10. patient-reported outcomes (work productivity)

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months

    Mean total score of WPAI (WORK PRODUCTIVITY AND ACTIVITY IMPAIRMENT QUESTIONNAIRE) In percentage from 0 to 100.

  11. patient-reported outcomes (fatigue)

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months

    Mean total score of FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy ) scores from 0 to 52, with higher scores corresponding to less fatigue

  12. patient-reported outcomes (body image)

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months

    Mean total score of body image questionnaire Ranges from 0 to 30 and can be calculated by summing up the 10 items. A higher score means a higher level of body image disturbance

  13. patient-reported outcomes (generic quality-of-life)

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months

    Mean total score of SF-36 (QUESTIONNAIRE SHORT FORM 36 HEALTH SURVEY ) Score ranging from 0 to 100. A low score reflects a perception of poor health, loss of function, presence of pain. A high score reflects a perception of good health, absence of functional deficit and pain

  14. patient-reported outcomes (anxiety/depression)

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months

    Mean total score of HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale) 14 items rated from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety (total A) and seven others to the depressive dimension (total D), thus allowing two scores (maximum score for each score = 21). Minimum : 0. The best outcome is 0.

  15. Patient's acceptability -patients refusing to be included

    Time frame: 24 months

    Number of screened patients refusing to be included

  16. patient's acceptability - The reason

    Time frame: 24 months

    The reason for refusing

  17. intervention-related adverse events

    Time frame: 24 months

    Proportion of patients with intervention (drug or surgery) -related adverse events during the study

  18. efficiency of medical treatment compared to surgery as assessed by a cost-utility analysis performed from a collective perspective

    Time frame: 24 months

    Incremental cost-utility ratio (cost per Quality-Adjusted Life-Years, QALYs) from a collective perspective

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Catherine Le Berre

CONTACT

[email protected]

(0)2 40 08 31 52 ext. + 33

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires Digestives

Registry information

Official study title

SyMptomAtic Stricturing Small Bowel CRohn's Disease - Medical Treatment Versus Surgery, a Prospective, Multi-centre, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial

Acronym: SMART

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2031
First posted
Oct 18, 2022
Registry last updated
Jun 23, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.