Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02002429

Medial Branch Blocks vs. Intra-articular Injections: Randomized, Controlled Study

Background: Facet interventions are the second most commonly performed procedure in pain clinics throughout the U.S, including in the military. Currently, there is no clear consensus regarding whether intra-articular (IA) blocks or medial branch blocks (facet joint nerve; MBB) are the best way to diagnose and treat facetogenic pain, or even whether or not to perform diagnostic/ prognostic blocks.

Hypothesis: IA blocks will provide better relief than MBB, but MBB may better select patients for radiofrequency denervation.

Purpose: Objective 1: Determine which "prognostic" block is the best predictor for RF denervation outcome; Objective 2: To determine whether adding steroids to IA or MBB may provide intermediate or long-term benefit to a subset of individuals.

Research Design: Randomized, comparative-effectiveness study

Methodology /Technical Approach: A total of 225 patients with non-radicular chronic low back pain (LBP) with suspected facetogenic etiology will be randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to one of 3 groups:

Group 1 will receive IA blocks with steroids and LA Group 2 will receive MBB with steroids and LA Group 3 will receive MBB with only saline

Those individuals who obtain significant (≥ 50% in groups 1 and 2,3) but temporary (< 1-month) relief will undergo radiofrequency (RF) denervation at their 1-month follow-up. In group 3, those patients who do not experience pain relief at 1-month will undergo RF denervation regardless of the pain relief they experience (as many practitioners in the military and civilian practices do without diagnostic blocks).1-3 Participants in Groups 1 and 2 who experience prolonged relief from their diagnostic/ therapeutic blocks with LA and steroids will not undergo RF denervation until their pain returns. Those individuals who experience prolonged relief lasting > 6 months will be given the option of repeating the diagnostic/ therapeutic block. In Groups 1, 2 and 3 patients who experience prolonged relief from the diagnostic blocks, follow-up visits will be at 1-month, 3-months and 6-months after the block, or until their pain relief wears off. In those who undergo denervation based on a positive block, follow-ups will be performed 1, 3 and 6-months after the denervation provided they continue to experience significant (> 50%) relief at each follow-up. Those individuals who fail to experience significant relief after denervation will be unblinded and exit the study per protocol.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Two hundred and twenty five patients with suspected lumbar facet arthropathy scheduled to undergo diagnostic lumbar facet blocks will be enrolled in this study at WRNMMC and randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio into one of 3 groups. Group 1 will receive IA blocks with steroids and LA, group 2 will receive MBB with steroids and LA, and group 3 will receive MBB with only saline. Subjects and (but not injecting physicians) evaluators will be blinded throughout their participation in the study as to treatment allocation. The nerves and joints to be blocked will be determined by physical exam (i.e. the location of paraspinal tenderness), and radiological findings.

Group 1: The 80 patients in this group will undergo IA blocks under fluoroscopic guidance with 0.5 mL solutions containing a 50:50 mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 mg depomethylprednisolone (called "steroid"). In all cases, correct positioning will be confirmed by the administration of contrast. After the block, they will be administered a pain diary to maintain for the next 6 hours. In accordance with standard care, a positive response will be > 50% pain relief lasting at least 3 hours. Patients who have not undergone physical therapy (PT) will be sent for PT . The first follow-up will be at 1-month. In those individuals with a positive block whose pain has returned to baseline, RF denervation will be performed at the same levels done for the diagnostic block. Once adequate sensory stimulation is confirmed, a 1 mL mixture containing equal amounts of 2% lidocaine 0.5 mL) and 20 mg depo-methylprednisolone (0.5 mL) will be injected to reduce procedure-related pain and decrease the incidence of neuritis. For those patients who have persistent (> 50%) pain relief at 1-month, they will return for their 2nd follow-up at 3-months. If their pain relief persists at this point, their final follow-up will be 6-months post-procedure. Pain relief in this group that lasts > 6 months can be treated with repeat IA injections if the patient so desires, while that which persists for < 6 months will be treated with RF denervation. Patients who experience a negative diagnostic block, or who fail to obtain significant pain relief at any follow-up from their RF denervation, will exit the study per protocol to pursue alternative treatments

Group 2: The 80 patients in this group will undergo MBB blocks under fluoroscopic guidance with 0.5 mL solutions containing a 50:50 mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 mg of depo-methylprednisolone steroid. After the block, they will be administered a pain diary to maintain for the next 6 hours. Patients who have not undergone physical therapy will be sent for a PT program. The first follow-up will be at 1-month. In those individuals who do not experience significant pain relief, RF denervation will be performed at the same levels done for the diagnostic block, as described in 'Group 1'. For those patients who have persistent (> 50%) pain relief at 1-month, they will return for their 2nd follow-up at 3-months. If their pain relief persists at this point, their final follow-up will be 6-months post-procedure. Pain relief in this group that lasts > 6 months can be treated with repeat MBB if they desire, while that which persists for < 6 months will be treated with RF denervation. Patients who experience a negative diagnostic block, or who fail to obtain significant pain relief at any follow-up from their RF denervation, will exit the study per protocol to pursue alternative treatments.

Group 3: The 40 patients in this group will undergo IA blocks under fluoroscopic guidance with 0.5 mL of normal saline. After the block, they will be administered a pain diary to maintain for the next 6 hours. Patients who have not undergone physical therapy will be sent for PT. The first follow-up will be at 1-month. In those individuals who fail to experience significant pain relief at this time point, RF denervation will be performed at the same levels done for the diagnostic block, as described in 'Group 1'. For those patients who have persistent (> 50%) pain relief at 1-month, they will return for their 2nd follow-up at 3-months. If their pain relief persists at this point, their final follow-up will be 6-months post-procedure. Pain relief from the block in this group that lasts > 6 months can be treated with repeat MBB, while that which persists for < 6 months will be treated with RF denervation. In patients who do not experience significant pain relief at their 1-month follow-up, RF denervation will be performed. Those who experience a negative outcome from RF denervation, will exit the study per protocol to pursue alternative treatments.

During follow visits, subjects who have difficulty arranging for transportation can elect to conduct their follow-up visits over the telephone, via fax, or by e-mail, whichever is most convenient.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • Suspected lumbar facet arthropathy based on history and physical exam (e.g. axial lower back pain, paraspinal tenderness, no pain referral below the knee)
  • NRS back pain score > 4;
  • MRI evidence of spinal pathology consistent with symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

  • Untreated coagulopathy
  • No MRI study
  • Signs or symptoms of cauda equina syndrome
  • Focal neurological signs and symptoms
  • Allergic reactions to local anesthetics or contrast dye
  • Serious medical or condition that might preclude optimal outcome
  • Pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

intra-articular injection

Procedure

Intra-articular injection into the affected facet joint(s) with 0.5 ml of a 50:50 solution containing 10 mg of depo-methylprednisolone and 0.5% bupivacaine. If the subject has a positive block a radiofrequency denervation will be performed at the affected joint.

Medial branch block

Procedure

Medial branch blocks at the nerves that supply the affected facet joint(s) with 0.5 ml of a 50:50 solution containing 10 mg of depo-methylprednisolone and 0.5% bupivacaine. If the subject has a positive block a radiofrequency denervation will be performed at the affected joint.

Saline injection

Procedure

Injection into the affected facet joint(s) with 0.5 ml of normal saline. All subjects in the group will receive radiofrequency denervation.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Score

    Time frame: 1 month

    0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) average pain score after facet injection

  2. Pain Score

    Time frame: 3 months

    0-10 numerical rating scale pain score after radiofrequency ablation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Successful outcome after RF denervation

    Time frame: 1 month

    Proportion of patients in each arm who undergo RF denervation who experience a > 50% decrease in pain score and a satisfaction score > 3

  2. Successful outcome after RF denervation

    Time frame: 3 months

    Proportion of patients in each arm who undergo RF denervation who experience a > 50% decrease in pain score and a satisfaction score > 3

  3. Successful outcome after RF denervation

    Time frame: 6 months

    Proportion of patients in each arm who undergo RF denervation who experience a > 50% decrease in pain score and a satisfaction score > 3

  4. Successful outcome after facet block

    Time frame: 1 month

    Proportion of patients in each arm who undergo RF denervation who experience a > 50% decrease in pain score and a satisfaction score > 3

  5. Successful outcome after facet block

    Time frame: 3 months

    Proportion of patients in each arm who undergo RF denervation who experience a > 50% decrease in pain score and a satisfaction score > 3

  6. Successful outcome after facet block

    Time frame: 6 months

    Proportion of patients in each arm who undergo RF denervation who experience a > 50% decrease in pain score and a satisfaction score > 3

  7. Proportion of people with a positive pain diary

    Time frame: 1-day after injection

    Proportion of people who experience > 50% pain relief after the diagnostic block

  8. Pain score

    Time frame: 1 month

    Worst NRS pain score 1 month after initial injection

  9. Pain score

    Time frame: 3 months

    Average NRS pain score 3 months after initial injection

  10. Pain score

    Time frame: 3 months

    Worst NRS pain score 3 months after initial injection

  11. Pain score

    Time frame: 6 months

    Average NRS pain score 6 months after initial injection

  12. Pain score

    Time frame: 6 months

    Worst NRS pain score 6 months after initial injection

  13. Pain score

    Time frame: 1 month

    Average NRS pain score 1 month after RF denervation

  14. Pain score

    Time frame: 1 month

    Worst NRS pain score 1 month after RF denervation

  15. Pain score

    Time frame: 3 months

    Worst NRS pain score 3 months after RF denervation

  16. Pain score

    Time frame: 6 months

    Average NRS pain score 6 months after RF denervation

  17. Pain score

    Time frame: 6 months

    Worst NRS pain score 6 months after RF denervation

  18. Function

    Time frame: 1 month

    Oswestry disability index score 1-month after initial injection

  19. Function

    Time frame: 3 months

    Oswestry disability score 3-months after initial injection

  20. Function

    Time frame: 3 months

    Oswestry disability score 6-months after initial injection

  21. Function

    Time frame: 1 month

    Oswestry disability score 1-month after RF denervation

  22. Function

    Time frame: 3 months

    Oswestry disability score 3-months after RF denervation

  23. Function

    Time frame: 6 months

    Oswestry disability score 6-months after RF denervation

  24. Satisfaction

    Time frame: 1-month

    Satisfaction on 1-5 scale 1-month after initial injection

  25. Satisfaction

    Time frame: 3-months

    Satisfaction on 1-5 scale 3-months after initial injection

  26. Satisfaction

    Time frame: 6-months

    Satisfaction on 1-5 scale 6-months after initial injection

  27. Satisfaction

    Time frame: 1-month

    Satisfaction on 1-5 scale 1-month after RF denervation

  28. Satisfaction

    Time frame: 3-months

    Satisfaction on 1-5 scale 3-months after RF denervation

  29. Satisfaction

    Time frame: 6-months

    Satisfaction on 1-5 scale 6-months after RF denervation

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University

Other

Collaborators

  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Registry information

Official study title

Medial Branch Blocks vs. Intra-articular Injections: Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation Using Diagnostic Injections.

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Dec 5, 2013
Registry last updated
Jan 12, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.