Southern Methodist University, Department of Psychology
Dallas, Texas, 75205, United States
NCT Number: NCT03547180
The primary goal of the present study is to identify mechanisms of therapeutic change of two theoretically contrasting therapeutic procedures: The first phase consists of comparing the outcome of the capnometry-assisted breathing therapy (BRT) with cognitive restructuring (CT). During the second phase participants of both interventions will undergo in-vivo exposure.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dallas, Texas, 75205, United States
The primary goal of the present study is to identify mechanisms of therapeutic change of two theoretically contrasting therapeutic procedures: While the rationale of breathing training is based on the assumption that hypocapnea (lower than normal levels of pCO2) is responsible for the development and maintenance of panic disorder, the rationale of cognitive interventions is that the primary mechanism in PD is the cognitive misinterpretation of benign bodily sensations. Further, while breathing training should induce a low-anxiety state (through parasympathetic activation) and, therefore, facilitate habituation to fearful situations, voluntary increases in arousal through hyperventilation (sympathetic activation) has been suggested to facilitate cognitive restructuring during exposure.
In order to study mechanisms that potentially produce clinical improvement, the investigators propose a 2-phase therapeutic intervention: The first phase consists of comparing the outcome of the capnometry-assisted respiratory training (CART) with cognitive restructuring (CT). During the second phase participants of both interventions will undergo in-vivo exposure therapy.
With the data collected from the study, the investigators will test the following hypotheses: (a) CART will produce more reduction in psycho-physiologically relevant measures of panic symptoms compared to CT, while cognitive restructuring will produce more reduction in cognitive parameters of panic symptoms; (b) CART will influence the response to voluntary hyperventilation tests by leading to faster recovery compared to CT. Improvement in respiratory psychophysiology will be correlated with improvement in panic symptom severity; (c) Breathing techniques during exposure will lead to a lower-anxiety state, facilitating but not inhibiting fear extinction as suggested by the safety aid theory
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Medical Exclusion Factors:
The training included four components: (a) educating patients about exacerbating panic symptoms through catastrophic thoughts (vicious cycle), (b) identifying negative cognitions associated with physical sensation triggers of recent panic attacks, (c) practicing replacement of maladaptive cognitions with non catastrophic explanations, and (d) instructing patients in between session exercises during Phase I.
Other names: CT
The training included four components: (a) educating patients about the exacerbation of panic symptoms through hypocapnia; (b) directing patients' attention to potentially detrimental respiratory patterns; (c) teaching patients techniques to control their respiration, in particular end-tidal PCO2; and (d) instructing patients in between-session exercises. Between-session exercises using a portable capnometer were to be performed twice a day for 17 min at home or elsewhere during Phase I.
Other names: CART
In this two-phase intervention, patients were randomized (within each site) to first receive five individual, weekly, 1-hr sessions of respiratory skill training (CART) or cognitive skill training (CT; Phase I, Skill Acquisition Training), followed by three weekly sessions of in-vivo exposure (Phase II, Application Training) plus a fourth session at 2-month follow-up.
Other names: EXP
Time frame: Pre (Week 0), Mid (Week 5), Post (Week 9), Follow-Up (Week 17)
Clinician administered; 7 items rated on 0 - 4 scale; scores over 9 suggest the need for formal diagnostic assessment
Time frame: Phase II (Weeks 7 - 9)
was administered to subset of patients for exposure and non exposure days
Southern Methodist University
Other
Moderators and Mediators of Treatment Change in Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04568109
Panic Disorder With Agoraphobia, Panic Disorder Without Agoraphobia
Greifswald, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT03061448
Panic Disorder With Agoraphobia
Stockholm, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT04793828
Anxiety Disorders, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Berlin, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05967468
Anxiety Disorder of Childhood, Anxiety Disorders
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial Details