Measuring Upper Extremity Functional Movement with Accelerometry: FitBit® Vs Actigraph®

To determine the criterion validity of the FitBit® Flex™ compared to the ActiGraph's Bluetooth® Smart wGT3X-BT wireless activity monitor, and contribute to the clinical utility of accelerometry measurement of UE movement.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Motor Activity Behavior

Age range

18 year–100 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

About this study

Participants will wear two different accelerometers (FitBit and Actigraph) to record normal, everyday movement. Data from each accelerometer will be compared to determine similarity.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Healthy adults with no upper extremity limitations

Exclusion criteria

Upper extremity limitations

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

Steps

Time frame: 24 hours

Number of steps

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rowe, Veronica, M.D.

Indiv

Registry information

Official study title

Measuring Upper Extremity Functional Movement with Accelerometry: FitBit Vs Actigraph

Important dates

Study start: 2015
Primary completion: 2016
Study completion: 2016
First posted: Apr 19, 2017
Registry last updated: Nov 14, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed