Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
NCT Number: NCT02637609
In 2012, the FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) issued guidance to clarify the principal benefit-risk factors FDA considers during the reviews for premarket approval applications and de novo classification requests. In addition to a detailed description of benefits and risks, CDRH listed "patient tolerance for risk and perspective on benefit" as a factor that CDRH may consider in regulatory reviews. It underlined the need for developing methods to measure patient preference and incorporate it into regulatory decision-making. The purpose of this study is to advance methods for patient and community engagement in patient-centered outcome research (PCOR) and has three objectives.
First, demonstrate good practices for patient and community involvement in PCOR projects by applying principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR).
Second, address methodological gaps pertaining to the use of stated-preference methods in studying priorities in PCOR. These include identifying the best methods for identifying patient priorities and strategies for analyzing variation in priorities. The investigators also seek to assess the relevance of stated-preference methods to patients and stakeholders using both qualitative and quantitative methods.
Third, demonstrate good practices for applying stated-preference methods by studying the priorities of patients with type II diabetes. While type II diabetes provides an important case study, this research will advance approaches and methods that will be broadly generalizable to other diseases, and to diverse patient and stakeholder groups.
Clinical Significance:
This project will illustrate and advance methods for assessing the values of patients and stakeholders. It will demonstrate how CBPR methods apply to PCOR studies and the value of stated-preference methods in measuring the priorities of patients and stakeholders and directing health care.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
This study will apply the principles of CBPR to involve patients and stakeholders associated with a local community board and a national diabetes advisory board in key decisions in the project. During year 1, the investigators will utilize mixed methods to develop, pretest, and pilot the survey instruments to assess the priorities of patients with type II diabetes. In year 2, the investigators plan further engagement to finalize the survey instruments, and will implement a nationally representative, racially/ethnically diverse sample of patients with type II diabetes. Based on further consultation, the investigators will conduct statistical analysis, including stratified analyses and segmentation of patients with similar priorities. In year 3, mixed methods will be applied to assess beliefs of patients and other consumers about the relevance of this work and its generalizability to other PCOR topics. Finally, lay language reports will be developed to highlight patient and stakeholder engagement and the application of stated-preference methods to the study of the priorities of patients with type II diabetes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Respondents receive questions asking them to rate each barrier or facilitator for diabetes self-management.
Respondents receive questions asking them to choose the best and worst factors that affect their diabetes self-management among a list of barriers and facilitators.
Time frame: One-time survey
Average Likert score or best-worst score that measures the impact of each factor on diabetes self-management. Positive scores indicate facilitators for diabetes self-management while negative scores indicate barriers. The magnitude of the score suggests the degree of the impact. Both scales are on a +1--1 scale. Positive 1 would be the largest possible facilitator and a negative 1 would be the largest possible barrier.
Time frame: One-time survey
Questions that asked respondents to evaluate whether it was easy to understand and answer the Likert scale or BWS tasks.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Other
Advancing Stated-preference Methods for Measuring the Preferences of Patients With Type II Diabetes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04286555
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02637622
Behavior, Diabetes Mellitus
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05878587
Arthritis, Diabetes Mellitus
Barnala, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT04499846
Behavior, Diabetes Mellitus
Lomme, Hauts-de-France, France
View Trial Details