Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02202824

Measuring Beliefs and Norms About Violence Against Women

The objective of our study was to determine the extent to which contextual information about the circumstances of intimate partner violence affects participants' responses to questions about their personal attitudes toward intimate partner violence.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Mbarara, Uganda

About this study

In national studies conducted throughout sub-Saharan Africa, survey data indicate that there is widespread acceptance of intimate partner violence by both men and women (Alio et al., 2011, Mann & Takyi, 2009, Rani et al., 2004, Uthman et al., 2009). For women, the proximate context of gender-unequal norms has important public health impacts. Men who report beliefs consistent with gender-unequal norms are more likely to be perpetrators of sexual violence (Shannon et al., 2012). Women are more likely to be victimized when they and their partners report concordant beliefs about the acceptability of intimate partner violence (Alio et al., 2011). And finally, women who live in areas characterized by gender-unequal norms about intimate partner violence are at greater risk for having their reproductive health compromised (Hung et al., 2012, Tsai & Subramanian, 2012). Accurate measurement of norms about intimate partner violence therefore has important implications for understanding the health risk environment for women.

The Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), which are nationally representative surveys conducted worldwide, have served as an important source of information on norms about intimate partner violence. However, a cross-country analysis of DHS data showed that minor deviations in survey wording may account for substantial cross-country variation in the extent to which women provide survey responses consistent with acceptance of intimate partner violence (Yount et al., 2011). Furthermore, in-depth interviews conducted among Bangladeshi women suggest that affirmative responses to DHS-style questions may better reflect their perceptions of prevailing norms or their individualized assumptions about contextual details rather than true beliefs about their acceptance of intimate partner violence (Schuler & Islam, 2008, Schuler et al., 2011). Taken together, these lines of inquiry suggest important limitations in the accuracy with which the DHS measure women's attitudes towards intimate partner violence.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years and older
  • Emancipated minors aged 16-18 years
  • Considers Nyakabare Parish their primary place of residence
  • Capable of providing informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Minors younger than 18 years, with the exception of emancipated minors
  • Does not consider Nyakabare Parish their primary place of residence
  • Unable to communicate with research staff, e.g., due to deafness, mutism, or aphasia
  • Persons with psychosis, neurological damage, acute intoxication, or an intelligence quotient less than 70, as determined in the field by non-clinical research staff in consultation with a supervisor

Treatment and study plan

Survey questionnaire

Other

Each of the scale versions elicits personal attitudes toward intimate partner violence and perceived norms about intimate partner violence, in a different fashion

Primary outcomes

  1. Personal attitudes toward intimate partner violence (5-item scale)

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Perceived norms about intimate partner violence (5-item scale)

    Time frame: Baseline

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Registry information

Official study title

Measuring Beliefs and Norms About Violence Against Women in Rural Uganda: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jul 29, 2014
Registry last updated
Dec 2, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.