University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
NCT Number: NCT06615245
Brief Summary
Using a repeated measures within-subject design with treatment order randomized, with healthy volunteers, this study will measure how much immersive Virtual Reality (VR) reduces performance on a simple attention demanding task during No VR vs. High Tech VR (for one group of 16 participants), and during a plausible control see through VR vs. High Tech VR (for another group of 20 participants).
The primary aim is to explore whether a highly immersive VR system makes VR significantly more attention demanding/distracting, compared to No VR, and compared to a less immersive VR system (a plausible controlled see through goggles).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
Healthy college student volunteers will participate in a repeated measure within subject trial studying attention using a divided attention paradigm.
One group of participants (16 healthy volunteers) will perform a simple attention demanding task during No VR for 2 minutes and they will perform the attention demanding task again during High Tech VR for 2 minutes.
Another group of 20 healthy volunteers will perform a simple attention demanding task during a less immersive see through VR (a plausible control condition) for 2 minutes and they will also perform the attention demanding task again during immersive High Tech VR for 2 minutes (treatment order randomized). This group will also rate their pain and anxiety during Quantitative Sensory Testing very brief thermal heat stimuli during No VR vs. during immersive high tech VR.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
No VR vs. immersive High Tech VR
plausible control condition vs. immersive high tech VR
Time frame: for n = 16, responses will be made 15 seconds after the VR condition vs. 15 seconds after the No VR during 2 minute sessions. For n = 20 subjects responses will be made 15 s after the plausible control condition, and 15 seconds after the immersive VR.
Number of correct responses on a divided attention task
Time frame: measured immediately after each two minute VR session.
Graphic rating scale measures of patients illusion of "being there" in virtual reality.
Time frame: immediately after each brief Quantitative Sensory Testing thermal heat stimulus
n = 20 participants report how much pain they experienced during No VR vs. during High Tech VR.
Time frame: immediately after each 2 minute session
subjective ratings of difficulty performing the simple attention task
Hunter Hoffman
Other
A Magic Bowl Low Tech Vs. High Tech Immersive Virtual Reality Distraction
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07549191
Children Pain Management, Distraction
Çorum, Osmancık, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07336719
Agnosia, Anxiety Disorders
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06964451
Distraction, Gamification
Kragujevac, Serbia
View Trial DetailsNCT06643832
Distraction, Neurologic Manifestations
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details