Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01539382

Measuring and Treating Brain Oxygen Levels in Open Heart Surgery

The purpose of this study is to test whether keeping the amount of oxygen delivered to the brain above a certain level during surgery and 24-hours after surgery improves recovery.

Hypothesis 1: keeping the amount of oxygen delivered to the brain above a certain level during surgery and 24-hours after surgery improves cognitive and neurological outcomes after cardiac and aortic surgery.

Hypothesis 2: keeping the amount of oxygen delivered to the brain above a certain level during surgery and 24-hours after surgery helps reduce major organ problems after cardiac and aortic surgery.

To test our hypotheses, the investigators will conduct a randomized control trial. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two possible study groups. In the Treatment Group, the brain oxygen level will be watched by doctors and used to guide care in the operating room and the first day in the intensive care unit after surgery. Doctors will try to keep the brain oxygen level in a normal range by adjusting your blood pressure, carbon dioxide and blood acidity levels, and blood count. In the Control Group, the doctors will not be aware of the brain oxygen level unless it falls below a level that may be dangerous. If a patient's brain oxygen falls below such a level, the doctors will adjust the blood pressure, carbon dioxide and blood acidity levels, and blood count to increase the brain oxygen level. All other procedures will be part of regular medical care and will be performed according to the standard of care.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, 10029, United States

About this study

Background

There is a high incidence of cognitive dysfunction, neurological dysfunction, and multi-system organ dysfunction syndrome following cardiac surgery. There is preliminary evidence that optimization of cerebral oxygenation is associated with improved neurological and clinical outcomes.

Cerebral oximetry using near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is based on the ability of near-infrared light to penetrate scalp and skull, and its differential intracranial absorbance by oxyhemoglobin (HbO2) and deoxyhemoglobin (Hb). Cerebral oximetry measures regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (SctO2) at the microvascular level (arterioles, venules, and capillaries) and provides information on the availability of oxygen in brain tissue. Unlike digital pulse oximetry, SctO2 reflects regional cerebral metabolism and the regional balance of cerebral oxygen supply and demand. NIRS SctO2 is the most promising monitoring technology for the purpose of guiding interventions targeted to improve brain and other organ preservation. The reasons for this include: (1) SctO2 is continuous, non-invasive, and available at the point of care; and (2) SctO2 is a sensitive index of cerebral hypoxia and/or cerebral ischemia, which are the main causes of brain injury in clinical settings. The preliminary work of Murkin strongly suggests that optimizing tissue perfusion using protocol-based treatments that optimize SctO2 decrease end-organ dysfunction in cardiothoracic surgical patients.

Recruitment Methods

Potential subjects are patients who are planned to undergo elective cardiac surgery at Mount Sinai Hospital. Potential subjects will be identified by checking the pre-admission schedule f or cardiothoracic surgery on a daily basis. Patients will be recruited at the surgical pre-admission screening; written informed consent will be obtained.

Risks to Subjects

Cerebral oximetry and computerized neurocognitive testing pose no known risk of harm to subjects.

Cerebral oximetry is an evolving technology that is not currently or imminently becoming a standard of care in monitoring for cardiothoracic surgical patients. The expense and the lack of outcome data make this a discretionary monitoring technology that is advocated by some, but that is not incorporated into any evidence-based guidelines or practice parameters. Therefore, compared with the existing standards of care, patients are not exposed to additional risk by withholding cerebral oximetry information from the practitioners.

Interventions to maintain cerebral oximetry above threshold values could be potentially injurious (e.g., initiating a red blood cell transfusion when it would not otherwise be given), however, any potential risk that is imparted by the interventions to maintain cerebral oximetry values are justified by the benefits of averting low or very low period of cerebral oximetry within the context of this research protocol.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients scheduled to undergo elective cardiac or thoracic aortic surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe preoperative cognitive impairment (i.e., dementia or developmental intellectual disability)
  • Sensory or motor impairment that would preclude reliable operation of a computer and keyboard
  • Lack of access to use computer-based cognitive evaluation
  • Non-English speaking patients
  • Renal failure requiring dialysis
  • Respiratory failure requiring home oxygen use
  • Child's B or C hepatic failure

Treatment and study plan

Cerebral oxygenation intervention

Procedure

The protocol for interventions to increase cerebral oxygenation levels above 60% optimizing pH, PaO2, PaCO2, bispectral index, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, venous oxygen saturation, and hematocrit. In addition, cerebral perfusion pressure of 70-80 mm Hg and flow >2.0 l/min/m2 will be maintained during cardiopulmonary bypass. In the ICU, temperatures will be maintained below 38 degrees by administering antipyretics or cooling, and dexmedetomidine will be used if the patient is agitated.

Other names: Intervention

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative neurocognitive decline

    Time frame: Baseline (before surgery)

    Postoperative cognitive deficit as defined as negative changes in Z-score of greater than or equal to 1.0 in any of the four neurocognitive domains tested by neurocognitive assessment (Response Speed, Processing Speed, Attention, and Memory).

  2. Postoperative neurocognitive decline

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

    Postoperative cognitive deficit as defined as negative changes in Z-score of greater than or equal to 1.0 in any of the four neurocognitive domains tested by neurocognitive assessment (Response Speed, Processing Speed, Attention, and Memory).

  3. Postoperative neurocognitive decline

    Time frame: 6 months after surgery

    Postoperative cognitive deficit as defined as negative changes in Z-score of greater than or equal to 1.0 in any of the four neurocognitive domains tested by neurocognitive assessment (Response Speed, Processing Speed, Attention, and Memory).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neurological dysfunction

    Time frame: During the hospitalization for postoperative recovery, average 8 days

    Delirium, stroke with neurological deficit at hospital discharge, persistent vegetative state, or brain death.

  2. Multiple organ dysfunction

    Time frame: During the hospitalization for postoperative recovery, average 8 days

    Non-neurological postoperative organ dysfunction, defined as any of the following: intraoperative or non-neurological death within 1 year of surgery; ICU Length of Stay > 10 days; Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome or respiratory failure > 5 days; need for renal replacement therapy; bilirubin > 3mg/dl, diagnosis of SIRS, sepsis, or DIC; multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), as defined by SOFA score > 5 at any time during ICU stay.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Optimizing Cerebral Oxygenation in Cardiac Surgery

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Feb 27, 2012
Registry last updated
Oct 23, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.