University of Texas at Austin
Austin, Texas, 78701, United States
NCT Number: NCT06490224
The investigators developed a brief set of subjective health measures designed to feel more relevant to patients seeking musculoskeletal specialty care, presented the scores to patients and clinicians using an easy-to-understand visual display, and measured whether or not this process harmed patient experience.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–89 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Austin, Texas, 78701, United States
Musculoskeletal patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; measures of levels of discomfort and incapability) were originally designed as tools for clinical research as were other self-reported measures of the subjective aspects of illness such as mental health measures. PROMs and mental health measures are increasingly used in clinical practice with individual patients. A few areas for improvement are noted in the use of questionnaires in musculoskeletal specialty care, including relevancy, understandability, and their confusing use in heath strategies. The investigators sought to assess the impact of an enhanced and more personalized self-reported health measurement strategy to address some of these opportunities by developing a brief set of items addressing levels of discomfort, incapability, mental, and social health designed to feel relevant to musculoskeletal specialty care and resulting in an easy-to-understand display that can be a communication tool for patients and clinicians.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Depending on the participant's complaint: Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score JR (HOOS JR), Knee disability and osteoarthritis outcome score JR (KOOS JR), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QUICKDASH), Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD7), Patient Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS Global 10)
Short visual map of responses to 10 questions of subjective measures.
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Quality of shared decision-making (Numerical scale from 1-27; Higher scores equal better outcome)
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Patient perceived clinician empathy (Numerical scale from 1-35; Higher scores equal better outcome)
University of Texas at Austin
Other
Can the Subjective Aspects of Health be Measured and Visually Displayed Without Harming Patient Experience: A Randomized Control Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07730164
Behavior, Communication About Health Information
Taoyuan, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT06354920
Physician-Patient Relations
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06074237
Behavior, Health Behavior
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05925374
Behavior, Blood-Borne Infections
Detroit, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details