CHU Angers
Angers, Maine Et Loire, 49933, France
NCT Number: NCT03715738
Breast asymmetry is a rare in plastic surgery. In majority of cases, it is idiopathic.
In cases that are poorly tolerated physically (vertebral imbalance, posture disorders) or psychologically, the decision to perform breast symmetrization surgery can be made. It is recommended to do this surgery after a slimming treatment if the woman is overweight or after pregnancy that causes a change in the structure and volume of the chest. In fact, the weight variations deteriorate the long-term result.
However, this surgical management remains difficult. In fact, the volume to be removed (unilateral breast reduction) to be symmetrized is a function of the volume of the contralateral breast and the preoperative drawings are made while standing. Currently, the evaluation of the volume to be removed remains subjective and is based on the experience of the surgeon. In addition, intraoperatively, this evaluation is also subjective because the patient is lying down which changes the position of the anatomical landmarks: the optimization of the symmetrization is only possible by the eye and the touch.
No measuring device is currently used to assess the difference in volume between the 2 breasts and guide the surgeon in the volume (or weight) to remove. It is therefore sometimes necessary to perform a second intervention in case of residual postoperative asymmetry.
Primary objective :
To study the association between the weight of tissues removed during the intervention and the variation of the breast volume (pre / postoperative) measured by the Créaform® GOPRO 3D digital camera adjusted on the density of the gland measured by electronic palpation (MyotonPRO).
Second objective : To study the association between the weight of tissues removed during the procedure and the variation of the breast volume (pre / postoperative) measured by the Créaform® GOPRO 3D digital camera adjusted on the density of the gland estimated by manual palpation (Likert scale from 1 to 5).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Angers, Maine Et Loire, 49933, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
After inclusion,are carried out:
The volumetric measurement of the breast is performed using the 3D digital camera. The patient is bent forward with hands resting on a chair to be as still as possible over a period of 30 seconds to 1 minute. The 3D digital camera rotates around the breast to capture the volume of the breast.
In peroperative, the weight of tissues removed is weighed (in grams). The removed weight is recorded in the observation notebook.
In postoperative (4 months), the possible long-term complications related to the intervention (mainly the dissatisfaction of the patient as for the aesthetic result) are collected then a new acquisition of the mammary volume is carried out with the digital camera 3D.
Once this measurement is completed, participation in the study is complete.
Time frame: one year
To study the association between the weight of tissues removed during the intervention and the variation of the breast volume (pre / postoperative) measured by the Créaform® GOPRO 3D digital camera adjusted on the density of the gland measured by electronic palpation (MyotonPRO).
Primary judgment criterion:
Coefficient associated with volume variation in the linear regression model (model 1) explaining weight by volume variation and density measured by electronic palpation.
Time frame: one year
To study the association between the weight of tissues removed during the procedure and the variation of the breast volume (pre / postoperative) measured by the Créaform® GOPRO 3D digital camera adjusted on the density of the gland estimated by manual palpation (Likert scale from 1 to 5).
Secondary judgment criterion 1:
Coefficient associated with volume variation in the linear regression model (Model 2) explaining weight by volume variation and estimated density by manual palpation.
Time frame: one year
Comparison of models 1 and 2 (estimated density by manual palpation or measured by electronic method), to see if one model is better than the other.
Secondary judgment criterion 2:
Akaike Criterion
University Hospital, Angers
Other Gov
MEasurement by a Numerical Approach of BREAst Volume MENABREA
Acronym: MENABREA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07186491
Anisomastia, Breast Abnormalities
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06401304
Anisomastia, Breast Asymmetry
Sydney, Australia
View Trial Details