Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT07082010

Measurement-Based Peer Supervision App for Non-Specialist Providers

The goal of this project is to enhance and evaluate the efficacy of a scalable digital solution designed to help train and support the work of non-specialist providers (NSPs), such as community health workers, to deliver therapy to individuals with anxiety and/or depression. The main questions this project aims to answer are:

* Can a digital tool help NSPs feel more confident in counseling patients? * How can a digital tool be designed to optimally support the work of NSPs?

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Baylor Scott & White Health

Dallas, Texas, 75204, United States

About this study

There is a critical shortage of mental health specialists (i.e., psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed mental health counselors) and a growing mental health crisis in the US. Task sharing, whereby highly qualified health workers share specific tasks non-specialist providers (NSPs) with less training and fewer qualifications in order to make more efficient use of the available human resources, is an approach that can scale and address unmet mental health needs, particularly in hard-to-reach communities with limited to no access to specialist care. The investigators propose a comprehensive solution to support a task sharing approach for delivering high quality brief psychosocial interventions. Our proposed digital platform is designed to support measurement-based peer supervision (MBPS), which includes the ability for NSPs to record therapy sessions, rate them using a validated quality scale, and review ratings safely and securely with peers in moderated group discussions. The investigators developed and successfully demonstrated acceptability, usability, and potential feasibility of digitally-enabled MBPS to support NSP performance and quality of care in Phase I. The goal of this Phase II project is to enhance and evaluate the efficacy of this digitally-enabled MBPS tool with NSPs working directly in communities. The investigators will address this goal with three specific aims.

In Aim 1, the investigators will build an enhanced version of the digital platform based on Phase I feedback and direct input from NSPs.

In Aim 2, the investigators will conduct a mixed methods evaluation of digitally-enabled MBPS with 50 target end users, i.e., NSPs recruited from a large health system in Texas and recently trained in behavioral activation. During this period, NSPs will engage in mock sessions with standardized patients. Primary outcomes of interest will be NSP session quality in delivering behavioral activation therapy and counselor self-efficacy.

Results of this Phase II work can provide important insights to guide the implementation and scaling of effective delivery of psychosocial interventions and program quality improvement, with the long-term goal of improving mental health outcomes in hard-to-reach communities that can benefit the most from NSP-led support.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older;
  • English-speaking; and
  • Completed EMPOWER Behavioral Activation training

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to participate in virtual meetings

Treatment and study plan

MBPS App

Device

A MBPS web application designed and built on a customizable case management platform (CommCare) to support non-specialist providers will be used by study participants for approximately 3 months.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Behavioral Activation (BA) Quality over Sessions

    Time frame: 12 weeks, from enrollment to study completion (assessed every 4 weeks)

    The BA Quality Scale for Healthy Activity Program score will be used to assess differences in BA quality over 3 sessions as scored by self and peer based on review of recordings. The BA Quality Scale ranges from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating higher quality.

  2. Change in Self-Efficacy

    Time frame: 12 weeks, from enrollment to study completion (assessed at Baseline and Endline)

    The Counselor Self-Efficacy Scale (SE-12) will be used to assess change in self-efficacy before and after the intervention. The scale ranges from 0 to 120 with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.

Secondary outcomes

  1. System Usability

    Time frame: End of 12 weeks, at study completion

    The Positive System Usability Scale (SUS) will be assessed at the end of the intervention period to assess perceived usability of the intervention. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher usability.

  2. System User Satisfaction

    Time frame: End of 12 weeks, at study completion

    The Net Promoter Score (NPS) will be used to assess user satisfaction with the intervention. The NPS is 1 item with a score ranging from -100 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher user satisfaction.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Dimagi Inc.

Industry

Collaborators

  • Baylor Scott and White Health
  • Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Registry information

Official study title

A Novel Digital Platform for Measurement-based Peer Supervision of Non-specialist Providers Conducting Brief Psychological Interventions

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 24, 2025
Registry last updated
Apr 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.