Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03861429

Me & My Wishes: An Efficacy Trial Using Videos

The aim of this study is to determine whether the Me & My Wishes intervention positively impacts communication of preferences among nursing home residents with dementia and their family caregivers and care team.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Marquis Hope Village Assisted Living, Canby, Oregon, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Me & My Wishes are videos of nursing home residents talking about their preferences for care, including four sections: About Me, Preferences for Today, Preferences for Medical Intervention and End of Life, and Afterthoughts. Knowing what residents want is essential to staff's ability to provide quality care and can inform family caregivers decision making especially in later stages of life as the resident's cognition declines-a time when family caregivers often feel unprepared. Persons with mild to moderate dementia can accurately express their everyday and EOL preferences, however, stereotypes persist about the decision making abilities of people with dementia that often prevent their involvement in conversations about care. The investigators propose to conduct a Stage II efficacy trial of Me & My Wishes-a novel approach for communicating resident care preferences-by creating videos with 48-54 nursing home residents with mild to moderate dementia and sharing their personalized video with informal (family) and formal (staff) caregivers. The investigators will employ a randomized wait-list control design in which residents in control nursing homes will delay sharing their video. Videos may be viewed two ways: 1) in resident quarterly care conferences; and 2) via a web-based link with resident-identified family members or friends.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Resident Inclusion Criteria:

  • Identified as having Alzheimer's or related dementia
  • Mild to moderate cognitive impairment (BIMS = 8-15, (MDS C0500) (nursing home residents only)
  • Makes Self Understood = <1 (MDS B0700)/present in medical record
  • Understood By Others = <1 (MDS B0800)/present in medical record
  • Reside at the facility at least 2 weeks identified as a long-term resident
  • Age >65 years
  • Speaks English

Family Inclusion Criteria:

  • Speaks English
  • Willing and able to watch the videos
  • Willing to complete short surveys. Being unable to attend care conference to view the video (e.g. due to distance) will not exclude family from participating.

Staff Inclusion Criteria:

  • Speaks English
  • Willing to watch the videos
  • Willing to complete short surveys

Resident Exclusion Criteria:

  • Limited communication capacity (e.g. aphasia)
  • Comatose
  • Cognitively intact
  • Severe cognitive impairment

Treatment and study plan

Me & My Wishes

Behavioral

Me & My Wishes videos communicate residents' preferences via personalized video recorded conversations. Me & My Wishes are videos of nursing home residents talking about their preferences for care, and include four sections: About Me, Preferences for Today, Preferences for Medical Intervention and End of Life, and Afterthoughts.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With a Documented Discussion of Goals of Care

    Time frame: Baseline, time of sharing (3 months from baseline), and 90 days post sharing video

    At each specified time point, a chart review was conducted to obtain whether goals of care discussions occurred (change in documentation in medical record, e.g. social work note), yes/no. Reported values indicated residents who had a documented GOC in chart (yes) at any time point.

    Goal of Care Conversations encompass two parts. A) some sharing of disease status / prognosis + B) discussion of a choice of goals/treatment decisions.

    Examples of Part A include disease understanding, disease state, disease progression, prognosis/life expectancy, documentation that the clinician tried to discuss prognosis but the patient/family refused

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-efficacy for Communicating Preferences

    Time frame: Baseline, time of sharing (3 months from baseline), and 90 days post sharing video

    Confidence in expressing or communicating about resident preferences. Self-efficacy items, range 1-5, higher is more confident.

Other outcomes

  1. Concordance of Psychosocial Preferences Between Video and Staff

    Time frame: Baseline, time of sharing (within 3 months of baseline), and 90 days post sharing video

    Psychosocial preferences include having family at the bedside; engaging in faith practices, such as prayer; having a pet at bedside; and engaging in activities such as being read to or listening to music. Preferences from the videos and surveys were coded as yes, no, don't know, or missing. Concordance occurred when the coded preferences in the resident's video and staff member response matched.

  2. Concordance of End of Life Preferences, Video and Staff

    Time frame: Baseline, time of sharing (within 3 months of baseline), and 90 days post sharing video

    EOL preferences include treatment preferences (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or CPR; breathing machine; tube feeding; life support; and pain treatment). Preferences from the videos and surveys were coded as yes, no, don't know, or missing. Concordance occurred when the coded preferences in the resident's video and staff member response matched.

  3. Concordance of Psychosocial Preferences, Video and Family

    Time frame: Baseline, time of sharing (within 3 months of baseline), and 90 days post sharing video

    Psychosocial preferences include having family at the bedside; engaging in faith practices, such as prayer; having a pet at bedside; and engaging in activities such as being read to or listening to music. Preferences from the videos and surveys were coded as yes, no, don't know, or missing. Concordance occurred when the coded preferences in the resident's video and family member response matched.

  4. Concordance of End of Life Preferences, Video and Family

    Time frame: Baseline, time of sharing (within 3 months of baseline), and 90 days post sharing video

    EOL preferences include treatment preferences (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or CPR; breathing machine; tube feeding; life support; and pain treatment). Preferences from the videos and surveys were coded as yes, no, don't know, or missing. Concordance occurred when the coded preferences in the resident's video and family member response matched.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Utah

Other

Collaborators

  • Brown University
  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Registry information

Official study title

Me & My Wishes: An Efficacy Trial of Long Term Care Residents With Alzheimer's Using Videos to Communicate Care Preferences With Caregivers

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2021
First posted
Mar 4, 2019
Registry last updated
Jun 26, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.