MCS110 in Patients With Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS)

To assess the efficacy of a single i.v. dose of MCS110 in changing the size of PVNS tumors (as compared to baseline) compared to placebo over 4 weeks evaluated by volume of PVNS tumors by 3-dimensional MRI. This analysis includes all data from patients 4 weeks after receiving the first dose of MCS110 (3, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo and assesses the tumor volume changes at week 4 as compared to baseline. As all parts (Part A, B and C) of the study are assessed after a single dose at week 4 the data set is called "ABC4".

To assess the efficacy of a single i.v. dose of MCS110 in percent change of the PVNS tumor volume at week 4 as compared to baseline and compared to placebo evaluated by volume of PVNS tumors by 3-dimensional MRI. This analysis includes all data from patients who received at least a single dose of MCS110 (3, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo and assesses the tumor volume changes at week 4 as compared to baseline. As all parts (Part A, B and C) of the study are assessed after a single dose at week 4 the data set is called "ABC4".

Assessment of maximum efficacy (multiple i.v.monthly doses (2 to 6) of 3, 5 or 10 mg/kg MCS110 or 3 & 10 mg/kg or 5 & 10 mg/kg in changing PVNS tumor volume (as compared to baseline) up to 8 weeks post last dose evaluated by MRI. Analysis included data starting from 1st dose of MCS110 in all treatment groups of Parts B and C. Part B patients who received placebo as 1st dose, measurement prior to receiving first dose of MCS110, was used as baseline and assessment time-points were adjusted accordingly. For Part C, participants starting treatment with low dose of MCS110 of 3 or 5 mg/kg could switch to 10 mg/kg after 3 monthly doses, if MCS110 was well tolerated and tumor volume reduction was ≤ 45%. Analysis includes data from patients who received at least 2 doses. The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg [3/10 mg/kg] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg [5/10 mg/kg]

To assess the maximum efficacy of multiple monthly i.v. doses (2 to 6) of 3, 5 or 10 mg/kg MCS110 or 3 and 10 mg/kg or 5 and 10 mg/kg by percent change in the PVNS tumor volume (as compared to baseline) up to 8 weeks post last dose evaluated by MRI. Subjects starting treatment with a low dose of MCS110 of 3 or 5 mg/kg could switch to 10 mg/kg after 3 monthly doses, if MCS110 was well tolerated and the tumor volume reduction was ≤ 45%. This analysis includes data from all participants who received at least 2 doses of MCS110 and thus includes only patients from Part B and C of the study, thus the data set is called "Part BC". The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg [3/10 mg/kg] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg [5/10 mg/kg].

Overall incidence of Adverse Events

Pharmacokinetic for a single dose of MCS110 for serum concentration -time curve (AUC).

Pharmacokinetic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 for maximum serum concentration (Cmax)

Pharmacokinetic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 for time to maximum concentration (Tmax)

Pharmacokinetic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 for evaluation of macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) plasma concentrations over time

Pharmacodynamic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 by measuring C-terminal telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen peptide (CTX-I), a biomarker of bone resorption. Data measured in participants from three arms: participants from Part A, B and C who received a single dose of 10 mg/kg and had assessment at week 4 (Part ABC4); participants from Part A and B who received placebo ; and participants from Part B and C who received multiple monthly doses of MCS110 (10 mg/kg.) Serum CTX-I data were generated in Part A and Part B. In Part C, samples were collected for serum bone CTX-I analysis. The analysis was not performed, as enough information on compound mode of action was obtained using creatine kinase (CK) and monocytes (hematology) data. Only data from 10mg/kg (single and multiple doses) are available.

To assess the immunogenicity of MCS110 in serum anti-MCS110 antibody concentrations

To assess the clinical response of joint range of motion following a single i.v. dose of MCS110 or placebo as compared to baseline 4 weeks post-dose evaluated in participants, who had a knee tumor, which was the majority of participants (75%). The analysis includes all data from patients 4 weeks after receiving the first dose of MCS110 (3, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo. As all parts (Part A, B and C) of the study are assessed after a single dose at week 4 the data set is called "ABC4".

To assess the clinical response of joint range of motion following multiple dose treatment with MCS110 3, 5, or 10 mg/kg evaluated in participants with knee tumor, which was the majority of participants (75%). The data presented are changes from baseline in degree. Participants, who started treatment with a low dose of MCS110 of 3 or 5 mg/kg could switch to 10 mg/kg after 3 monthly doses, if MCS110 was well tolerated and the tumor volume reduction was ≤ 45%. This analysis includes data from participants with knee tumor who received at least 2 doses of MCS110 and thus includes only patients from Part B and C of the study, thus the data set is called "Part BC". The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg [3/10 mg/kg] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg [5/10 mg/kg].

Measurement of the participant's pain with a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) following treatment with MCS110 3, 5, or 10 mg/kg evaluated. Data presented are changes from baseline in degree. Participants were asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented her/his pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score was determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the participants mark, providing a score from 0-100. Analysis includes data from participants with knee tumor who received at least 2 doses of MCS110 and thus includes only patients from Part B and C of the study, thus the data set is called "Part BC". The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg [3/10 mg/kg] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg [5/10 mg/kg].

Time to relapse describes the time frame from baseline when the tumor volume increases again after the treatment with MCS110. To be considered a relapse tumor volume had to increase greater than 50% of the difference between tumor volume at baseline and the lowest tumor volume measured by MRI. In this assessment the Part B and Part C patients were analyzed separately. N/A (not available):Data analysis not performed as sample size was not analyzable as no patient had surgery/relapse.

Time to surgery describes the time frame from baseline to the time point when participants had surgical removement of PVNS tumor. This could be either residual tumor after the tumor volume was reduced or surgery due to relapse. In this assessment the Part B and Part C patients were analyzed separately. Not Available (NA): Data analysis not performed as sample size was not analyzable as no patient had surgery.

The mHAQ assesses 20 activities in 8 categories related to daily life, which are rated on a 4-point Likert scale. The mHAQ is calculated as the average of the single scores with the following scoring: without difficulty =0; with some difficulty =1; with much difficulty =2; unable to do =3. Total score is between 0 - 3.0. Values <0.3 are considered normal. Data presented include only participants, who received multiple doses of MCS110.

Blood samples were collected for the evaluation of CD14+ monocytes (using FACS) and CD14+ CD16+ monocytes. Based on preliminary analysis, the quality of the samples did not allow meaningful conclusions to be drawn. Thus, in Part B, the monocyte sample collection was discontinued.

The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life (QOL), pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life, pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life, pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life, pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life, pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status. The EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS)has a range from 0-100: worst possible to perfect health. Data show the absolute change from baseline of EQ5D VAS and at the different visits for participants, who received multiple doses of MCS110. (PART B and PART C).