Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States
NCT Number: NCT04742673
This proof-of-concept study examines whether the acute brain dysfunction that occurs in critically ill patients is improved by administration of intravenous guanfacine.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States
Delirium during critical illness is, to date, the primary potentially modifiable risk factor for acquired dementia after critical illness (ADRD). There are, however, no Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medications to mitigate delirium. Benzodiazepines are ineffective at reducing the incidence or duration of delirium, and on the contrary, increase the risk. Furthermore, large randomized controlled studies have shown that antipsychotic agents have no effect (vs. placebo) on delirium duration, mechanical ventilation, hospital length of stay, or death. Therefore, current clinical practice guidelines no longer recommend routine use of benzodiazepines or antipsychotics for treatment of delirium. Despite these recommendations, benzodiazepine, antipsychotics, and other drugs are routinely prescribed to critically ill patients due to the urgent clinical need to control delirium symptoms. The alpha-2 agonist dexmedetomidine is the most successful agent for delirium identified to date. However, it is typically administered as a continuous infusion and requires ICU-level monitoring due to hypotension and bradycardia risks. The delirium sparing benefits of dexmedetomidine have been postulated to result from alpha-2 agonist mediated modulation of CNS inflammation, microcirculatory blood flow, and biomimetic sleep.
The alpha-2 agonist guanfacine, an FDA-approved medication for use in hypertension and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, has a higher selectivity for the alpha-2A receptor in the central nervous system. Thus, delirium sparing benefits may be improved with guanfacine while reducing systemic effects. Further, instead of a continuous infusion, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of guanfacine favor a twice a day bolus dosing schedule. This Maximizing trEatment of Neurological Dysfunction using INtravenous Guanfacine (MENDING) study will investigate the benefits of intravenous (IV) guanfacine. In this phase II proof-of-concept trial of IV guanfacine vs. placebo for the treatment of critical illness delirium, the following specific aims will be tested in critically ill patients with delirium:
Aim 1: To determine whether IV guanfacine will increase the number of days alive without delirium and coma (DCFDs) over 14 days relative to placebo.
Aim 2: To evaluate whether IV guanfacine twice a day will increase days alive and free of mechanical ventilation (VFDs) and days alive and free of the ICU (IFDs) over 28 days relative to placebo.
Aim 3: To assess whether IV guanfacine can reduce the development of ADRD after critical illness.
Identifying a safe and effective treatment for delirium would have exponential benefits to patients, families, healthcare, and society. This first study of IV guanfacine builds upon extensive research regarding the benefits of alpha-2 agonists for brain dysfunction.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients randomized to the IV Guanfacine arm will receive intravenous guanfacine when they exhibit ICU delirium.
Patients randomized to the placebo arm will receive intravenous normal saline when they exhibit ICU delirium.
Time frame: 14 days after randomization
Time frame: 28 days after randomization
Time frame: 28 days after randomization
Time frame: 180 days after randomization
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 22, with higher numbers indicating better cognition. A score of 18 or below is considered a positive screen for at least mild cognitive impairment.
Time frame: 28 days after randomization
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
Time frame: 180 days after after randomization
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System V.1.2-Physical Function 8b is a process that involves using a specific set of 8 questions to assess a patient's self-reported ability to perform physical activities. These questions are designed to measure a person's physical function, focusing on their ability to perform daily activities, including those involving upper and lower extremities, and central body regions. Patients respond to each question on a scale, typically a five-point scale (e.g., 1 = not at all to 5 = completely). The total raw score is then converted to a T-score using a table provided in the PROMIS scoring manual. T-scores are standardized scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, allowing for comparison across individuals and populations. Higher T-scores generally indicate a higher level of physical function.
Time frame: 180 days after after randomization
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System V.1.1-Global is a 10-item questionnaire that measures physical and mental health in patients. The questionnaire uses a T-score metric, where a score of 50 represents the average for the US population with a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicate better health.
Time frame: 180 days after randomization
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System V.1.0-Pain Interference 8a measures the self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of a person's life and may include the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. It consists of 8 questions, each with a scale ranging from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). The score is calculated by summing the responses to all 8 questions, resulting in a raw score range from 8 to 40. This raw score is then converted into a T-score, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, and a higher T-score indicating more pain interference.
Time frame: 180 days after randomization
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System V.1.0-Applied Cognition is designed to assess a patient's self-perceived cognitive abilities and concerns in everyday life. The PROMIS measures use a T-score metric with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores indicate better perceived cognitive functioning.
Time frame: up to 180 days after hospital discharge
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System V.1.0-Sleep Disturbance utilizes a 5-point Likert scale to assess sleep quality, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. The scale's T-score is a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating a greater level of sleep disturbance.
Time frame: 14 days after randomization
Total opioid dose in fentanyl equivalents
Time frame: 14 days after randomization, while on study drug
Refractory systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg or Mean arterial blood pressure < 65 mm Hg despite ongoing ICU therapies
Time frame: 14 days after randomization, while on study drug
Heart rate < 60 beats per minute despite ongoing ICU therapies
Time frame: 14 days after randomization, while on study drug
New, acute neurologic disturbances such as blurred vision, dizziness, weakness, or vertigo
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Other
Acronym: MENDING
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03972384
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03098459
Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer; Early Onset
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06411561
Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer's Disease
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04722939
Acute Kidney Injury, Cerebral Autoregulation
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details