Brigham and Womens Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06252129
Lung cancer patients undergoing upfront surgery, highly benefit from a systematic lymph node dissection in the mediastinum and in the surgical specimens. The latter is performed by the pathologist. Developing a standardized technique to dissect the lobectomy specimen has the potential of maximizing the retrieval of all N1 stations lymph nodes. The investigators believe that the adoption of such technique will improve lung cancer staging and identify a higher number of patients that qualify for adjuvant therapies.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Anatomic lung resection with systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection is the standard of care for patients with clinical stage I or II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the best type of resection may sometimes be debated, it is clear that mediastinal, hilar, and lobar lymph nodes (LNs) should be routinely retrieved to achieve a complete lung cancer resection. According to major international guidelines, at least 3 hilar/intrapulmonary stations and 3 mediastinal stations should be assessed during resection. Although there is still a debate over whether the ideal number of LN stations sampled or the total number of LNs removed per station provides a better analysis, radical systematic LN dissection seems to offer the best oncological outcomes. In fact, in patients with tumors ≤4 cm in diameter completely resected, the quality of the mediastinal lymph node dissection and the thoroughness of the examination of the surgical specimen will select candidates for adjuvant treatment and define oncologic prognosis. The consequences of an incorrect lymph node classification can be substantial: while patients with N0 NSCLC have approximately 75% 5-year overall survival (OS), patients with NSCLC classified as N1 have a 5-year OS of 49%, and patients with NSCLC classified as N2 a 5-year OS of 36%. Therefore, the burden of determining the correct prognosis lies on the surgeon to perform a rigorous and thorough oncological resection, and on the pathologist to fully assess enough intrapulmonary LNs. Inaccuracy by either specialist leads to pathologic understage and suboptimal clinical management, which will lead to poor patient outcomes.
Developing a standardized technique to dissect the lobectomy specimen has the potential of maximizing the retrieval of all N1 stations lymph nodes. The investigators believe that the adoption of such technique will improve lung cancer staging and identify a higher number of patients that qualify for adjuvant therapies.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A lobectomy specimen's resection will undergo systematic lymph node dissection either by the patient's treating thoracic surgeon and/or by a member of the pathology team.
The protocol for a standardized lymph node dissection consists of a series of blunt peribronchial dissections starting from the hilum to the periphery, with particular attention to points of airway bifurcation where intrapulmonary lymph nodes aggregate. By emphasizing the intrapulmonary lymph node map and a standardized dissection, the team will remove more lymph nodes from the lobectomy specimen, resulting in an accurate N staging.
Control group
Time frame: 2 weeks
To compare the number of stations and lymph nodes sampled when adopting a standardized technique compared to the conventional (prior) technique.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Determine the number of cases upstaged to N1 with the intrapulmonary lymph node dissection compared to the conventional technique.
Time frame: 3 years
Three years recurrence-free survival rate of patients undergoing standardize dissection versus conventional technique.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05596578
Lung Cancer, Lung Diseases
Lucerne, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT04233476
Lung Cancer, Lung Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT02813603
Lung Cancer, Lung Diseases
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT01386580
Brain Diseases, Brain Metastases
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details