Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, 21512, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT04214054
This study was carried out to compare the outcome of sinus lift without grafting material, versus the use of moldable, self hardening calcium phosphate biomaterials with simultaneous implant placement.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Alexandria, 21512, Egypt
This study was designed as a randomized controlled clinical trial, the study population consisted of 20 patients with missing maxillary posterior teeth and residual bone height 5-7mm. The sample was selected conveniently according to a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the participants were allocated randomly into two equal groups. All patients had sinus lift using piezosurgery device with simultaneous implant placement. In group I, blood clot was the only filling material. In group II, moldable, self-hardening calcium phosphate was the filling material. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were done through 6 months postoperatively.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Incision was performed in the canine area then a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated and exposure of the lateral aspect of the maxillary sinus. Osteotomy of the buccal window was performed using the piezosurgery device followed by meticulous dissection of the sinus membrane. Drilling the site were implants were to be placed, guided by the preformed surgical stent. Implants of appropriate size were torqued to engage the apical aspect of the implant recipient site. The sinus was augmented with moldable self-hardening biphasic calcium phosphate. Repositioning and suturing of the flap using 3-0 black silk suture material.
A pyramidal full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was performed distal to the canine area with a crestal incision located palatally in the edentulous area and vertical extension of the incision to the buccal vestibule using Bard Parker blade number 15. The flap was reflected exposing the alveolar bone. Lateral window was performed and the sinus membrane was elevated using piezo surgery. Drilling at the sites where implants were to be placed was done using Neobiotech implant drilling Kit. Implants. Implants were placed in a self-tapping fashion using a torque wrench. Flaps were replaced back and sutured using 3-0 black silk suture material.
Time frame: 1 week
Pain was assessed through on a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). (0-1= None, 2-4= Mild, 5-7= Moderate, 8-10= Severe)
Time frame: 1 week
The presence of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) will be determined clinically using BLUM'S criteria. Wound healing was assessed and recorded depending on the absence or presence of dehiscence, every opening along the incision will be recorded as dehiscence , dental tweezers will be used to identify it.
Time frame: 6 months
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was done. The apparatus and the settings were kept the same during all the preoperative scans to evaluate the amount of vertical bone height gained, the change of bone density and the marginal bone loss postoperatively.
Time frame: 6 months
Examining implant stability was done using Osstell (Osstell co. Swedan). It is a noninvasive and easy-to-use system to determine implant stability and to assess the process of osseointegration.
Nourhan M.Aly
Other
Maxillary Sinus Lift With and Without Self Hardening Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and Simultaneous Implant Placement
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07407361
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation, Posterior Maxillary Atrophy
Tokat Province, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07348198
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation, Posterior Maxillary Atrophy
Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06601816
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
Ordu, Altınordu, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03184857
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details