Masters in Dental Implantology (MIO) program at the University of Salvador (USAL)-Argentine Dental Association
Buenos Aires, 1125, Argentina
NCT Number: NCT05577520
The decrease in maxillary alveolar ridge bone volume and sinus pneumatization are a challenge to implant-assisted prosthetic rehabilitation. Guided bone regeneration using bone substitutes is an adequate alternative for maxillary sinus augmentation. Objective: To histologically and histomorphometrically compare bone repair response to 250 to 1000 µm and 1000 to 2000 µm anorganic bovine bone mineral (ABBM) particles as bone substitute in maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Buenos Aires, 1125, Argentina
Twenty patients were treated with SMA in two steps. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups (n=10): SPG (small particles group) and LPG (large particles group). Different size ABBM particles were implanted in their maxillary sinus, accordingly. A vertical bone core biopsy was obtained at the implant site using a punch trephine. The samples were processed for histological observation and measured histomorphometrically to determine the percentage onewly formed bone (%NB), bone substitute (%BS), bone marrow (%BM), and osseointegration (%OI). Results were statistically analyzed using Student's t test (p ≤ 0.05).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients with a history of chronic periodontitis were treated and then enrolled in the study. Patients who developed post-operative maxillary sinus infection or showed allergic reactions attributable to the grafting material were eliminated from the study.
Other names: Sinus floor lift, Sinus floor elevation
Time frame: 10 month
histomorphometric parameter was assessed in a standardized area
Time frame: 10 month
histomorphometric parameter was assessed in a standardized area
Time frame: 10 month
histomorphometric parameter was assessed in a standardized area
Time frame: 10 month
histomorphometric parameter was assessed in a standardized area, defined as the percentage of graft particle-newly formed bone integration
Universidad del Salvador, Argentina
Other
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Different Size Bovine Bone Particles: a Histomorfometric Comparison
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07407361
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation, Posterior Maxillary Atrophy
Tokat Province, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07348198
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation, Posterior Maxillary Atrophy
Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06601816
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
Ordu, Altınordu, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03184857
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details