Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04071652

MATTERS Study - Mistral Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Repair FIM Study

The Mistral is an investigational device intended for percutaneous trans-catheter repair in high risk for surgery individuals suffering from functional Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR).

The device system is to be used only in accordance with the approved Investigational Plan on subjects who have signed an informed consent form. Device use is limited to the approved study investigators.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Haddassah, Jerusalem, Kiryat Hadassah, Israel

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The study is designed to clinically demonstrate device acute safety and technical performance (Primary Endpoints) along with longer FU device safety and effectiveness evaluation (Secondary Endpoint).

The main objectives of the study are :

  • Evaluate the Acute safety of the implanted Mistral device post procedure and at 30 day follow up period.
  • Evaluate the long term Safety of the device.
  • Demonstrate effectiveness of the Mistral device in reducing TR.

Primary endpoints:

  • Safety: Acute safety. Rate of device related SAE including device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse event. At discharge and 30 days.
  • Performance: Mistral Implantation rate of technical success (defined as successful device implantation with grasped chords from at least two leaflets.).

Secondary endpoints:

  • Safety: Safety at 3, 6 and 12 months. Rate of device related SAEs at 3, 6 and 12 months.
  • Effectiveness: TR reduction post-procedure, at discharge and 30 days, 3 and 6 months. Improved NYHA class, 6MWTdistance and KCCQ (quality of life) at 30 days, 3 and 6 months.

Relevant only for patients 11-20:

  • Safety: Safety at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Rate of device related SAEs at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
  • Effectiveness: TR reduction post-procedure, at discharge and 30 days, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Improved NYHA class, 6MWT distance and KCCQ (quality of Life) at 30 days, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject has given signed study Informed Consent for participation prior to procedure.
  • Subject is ≥ 18 years of age or legal age in host country
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with all required follow-up evaluations
  • Genders eligible for the study: Both genders
  • Subject has TR of grade 3+ or more
  • Subject has left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >20 %
  • Subject is of functional class 2 or more (NYHA)
  • The subject is high risk to undergo TV surgery as assessed and consented by a cardiac surgeon and an interventional cardiologist at the site (center heart team), and according to ESC/EACTS guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease.
  • Patients with Jugular and/or Femoral veins enabling catheterization with 12Fr catheters
  • Life expectancy ≥ 1 year

Exclusion criteria

  • Tricuspid Stenosis >mild
  • Tricuspid Subvalvular calcification or calcification of the chordae.
  • Subject has a history of a cerebral vascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the past 3 months.
  • Subject has a history of a myocardial infarction (MI) in the past 3 months
  • Subject has had a percutaneous interventional or other invasive cardiac or peripheral procedure ≤ 7 days of the index procedure
  • Subject has a history of, or has active endocarditis
  • Subject has echocardiographic evidence of intra-cardiac mass, thrombus, vegetation or soft-mobile deposits
  • Subject is in acute pulmonary edema.
  • Subject has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic or mechanical support.
  • Subject has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication
  • Subject has renal insufficiency as evidenced by a serum Creatinine > 3.0mg/dL.
  • Subject has ongoing infection or sepsis
  • Subject has blood dyscrasias (leukopenia, acute anemia, thrombocytopenia, history of bleeding diathesis, or coagulopathy)
  • Subject has an active peptic ulcer or has had gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within the past 3 months prior to the index procedure
  • Subject requires emergency surgery for any reason
  • Subject has a known allergy to Nitinol alloys, 316L\\304 stainless steel.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients being dependent upon the sponsor or upon the investigator or upon the investigational site.
  • Subject has a known contrast media allergy
  • Presence of high degree atrio-ventricular block (2nd or 3rd degree A-V block), or the presence of tri-fascicular block
  • According to investigator on site the patient is suffering from a severe end stage disease (e.g. malignancy, severe pulmonary disease, liver disease, renal failure) and has a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
  • Contraindication for treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy for at least 3 months
  • Contraindication for TEE including trans-gastric views.

Treatment and study plan

Mistral implantation

Device

Mistral implant is implanted in the Tricuspid valve

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety: Acute safety. Rate of device related SAE

    Time frame: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day

    including device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse event

  2. Safety: Acute safety. Rate of device related SAE

    Time frame: At 30 days post procedure

    including device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse event

  3. Performance: Mistral Implantation rate of technical success

    Time frame: Procedure

    defined as successful device implantation with grasped chords from at least two leaflets

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety: Rate of device related SAE

    Time frame: at 3 months post procedure

  2. Safety: Rate of device related SAE

    Time frame: at 6 months post procedure

  3. Safety: Rate of device related SAE

    Time frame: at 12 months post procedure

  4. Safety: Rate of device related SAE

    Time frame: at 24 months post procedure

    Relevant only for patients 11-20

  5. Effectiveness: TR Grade reduction

    Time frame: post procedure (1 hour after implant device has been implanted)

  6. Effectiveness: TR Grade reduction

    Time frame: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day

  7. Effectiveness: TR Grade reduction

    Time frame: at 30 days post procedure

  8. Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)

    Time frame: at 30 days post procedure

  9. Effectiveness: 6MWT distance

    Time frame: at 30 days post procedure

  10. Effectiveness: KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire)

    Time frame: at 30 days post procedure

  11. Effectiveness: TR Grade reduction

    Time frame: at 3 months post procedure

  12. Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)

    Time frame: at 3 months post procedure

  13. Effectiveness: 6MWT distance

    Time frame: at 3 months post procedure

  14. Effectiveness: KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire)

    Time frame: at 3 months post procedure

  15. Effectiveness: TR Grade reduction

    Time frame: at 6 months post procedure

  16. Effectiveness: TR Grade reduction

    Time frame: at 12 months post procedure

    Relevant only for patients 11-20

  17. Effectiveness: TR Grade reduction

    Time frame: at 24 months post procedure

    Relevant only for patients 11-20

  18. Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)

    Time frame: at 6 months post procedure

  19. Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)

    Time frame: at 12 months post procedure

    Relevant only for patients 11-20

  20. Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)

    Time frame: at 24 months post procedure

    Relevant only for patients 11-20

  21. Effectiveness: 6MWT distance

    Time frame: at 6 months post procedure

  22. Effectiveness: 6MWT distance

    Time frame: at 12 months post procedure

    Relevant only for patients 11-20

  23. Effectiveness: 6MWT distance

    Time frame: at 24 months post procedure

    Relevant only for patients 11-20

  24. Effectiveness: KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire)

    Time frame: at 6 months post procedure

  25. Effectiveness: KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire)

    Time frame: at 12 months post procedure

    Relevant only for patients 11-20

  26. Effectiveness: KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire)

    Time frame: at 24 months post procedure

    Relevant only for patients 11-20

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mitralix

Industry

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2023
First posted
Aug 28, 2019
Registry last updated
Oct 19, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.