No intervention
OtherObservation only
NCT Number: NCT02586714
This study examined the relationships between maternal body composition, placental function, and fetal nutrition and body composition, and sought to determine the most accurate method of maternal body composition analysis in late pregnancy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
Female
Observational
This study examined the relationships between maternal body composition, placental function, and fetal nutrition and body composition, and sought to determine the most accurate method of maternal body composition analysis in late pregnancy. This project integrates body composition analysis, nutrition, and metabolic factors to study the impact of maternal body composition and diet on placental function and fetal growth.
Research Project: The proposed enrollment of 41 pregnant women at term (>37 weeks gestation) was completed in September 2013. The subjects underwent four body composition measurements (bioelectrical impedance, skin-fold thickness, BodPod, and deuterium dilution) and dietary surveys along with a fasting blood draw. The subjects returned 2 weeks postpartum for repeat measurements along with a DEXA scan.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Healthy pregnant women at term with singleton gestation
Exclusion criteria
Medical condition requiring daily medication Fetal congenital anomalies Diabetes
Observation only
Time frame: 37 weeks gestation
Subjects presented for their study visits in the morning following an overnight fast. During the first visit, at 37-38 weeks' gestation, they underwent four measures: 1) ADP, 2) TBW volume by deuterium (2H2O) dilution, 3) skin-fold thickness (SFT), and 4) bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). To determine maternal FM (kg) without the presence of the fetus or placenta, and to avoid radiation exposure to the fetus, subjects returned for a second study visit two weeks postpartum for repeat measurements by the above methods plus a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan (DXA) scan. Statistical analysis was performed using the R package Method Comparison Regression, version 1.2.1. Estimates of mean FM (kg) were compared by analysis of variance.
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
Nih
Acronym: MBC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02701426
Behavior, Body Weight
Lille, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02924636
Body Weight, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Lille, France
View Trial DetailsNCT00804765
Body Weight, Childhood Obesity
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02791568
Body Weight, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial Details