Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03763630

MAPS & ITEC Cohorts: 6-8 Years Follow-up

This study represents the follow-up, age 6-8 years, of children recruited at birth into two cohorts. The first cohort, the Mite Allergen Prevention Study (MAPS) was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of the use of house dust-mite immunotherapy in the primary prevention of atopy and asthma. The Immune Tolerance in Early Childhood (ITEC) cohort is a separate observational cohort following up infants at high risk of atopy and correlating atopic disease development with epigenetic markers.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

5 month–9 month

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom

Loading trial locations.

About this study

There is an epidemic of allergic disease in childhood and current preventative strategies have failed to demonstrate effectiveness outside of isolated trials. In a previous study, the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with house dust mite in preventing the development of allergic sensitisation in infants was assessed. The long term objective was to assess the effect of the intervention on the subsequent development of asthma. The hypothesis is that high dose oral immunotherapy will induce immune tolerance and reduce development of allergic sensitisation and later clinical asthma and allergy. A total of 111 infants at high risk of allergy (with ≥2 first degree relatives affected by asthma or allergy) but with no evidence of allergic sensitisation at recruitment were recruited. These infants were randomised at 6 months of age to receive a year of active HDM (House dust-mite) allergen extract delivered as SLIT or placebo intervention. At 18 months of age, there was a significant reduction in cumulative allergic sensitisation in the SLIT intervention group and a trend for reduction in allergic symptoms. They have also been followed up at 3 years of age. The data currently being analysed.

Additionally, an observational cohort (Immune Tolerance in Early Childhood, ITEC) was recruited at birth with the same inclusion criteria as the interventional one and assessed in the same way up to 3 years. This cohort has provided additional control data and samples to utilise in the analyses.

This proposed study is the 6-8 year follow up of these interventional and observational cohorts. The aim of the 6-8 year assessment is to assess the efficacy of prophylactic oral immunotherapy with HDM allergen in preventing the later development of asthma. The hypothesis is that high dose oral immunotherapy will induce immune tolerance and reduce development of allergic sensitisation and later clinical asthma and allergy. Participants will be assessed 6-8 years after finishing the intervention. The assessment will include a questionnaire, skin prick testing to the common aeroallergens and food allergens and lung function. Families and study investigators will both be blinded to participants' original treatment allocations. An additional aim is to investigate the epigenetic and immune mechanisms involved in the development of asthma and allergy and how allergen immunotherapy influence this process.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

•Inclusion in original study cohorts at birth

•≥2 first-degree relatives with allergic disease (food allergy, asthma, eczema, rhinoconjunctivitis)

Exclusion criteria

  • Not included in the original study cohorts
  • Skin-prick test positive to any allergen (HDM, cat, grass pollen, peanut, egg and milk) age 5 months

Treatment and study plan

House dust-mite SLIT

Drug

received 2000 standard treatment units of glycerinated HDM allergen extract (ALK-AbellÓ) per day. Normal saline was administered to the placebo group. 11 µg of HDM allergen (equal parts of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae) administered twice daily as oral drops.

Other names: glycerinated HDM allergen extract (ALK-AbellÓ)

normal saline

Drug

Normal saline administered in same frequency and manner as intervention

Other names: Normal saline placebo control

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Asthma - parental questionnaire

    Time frame: Age 6 years

    Comparison of clinical asthma, as assessed by parental questionnaire, at age 6 years between control and intervention groups. Clinical asthma will be defined as either doctor diagnosed asthma or presence of wheeze and asthma medication use within the past year.

  2. Clinical Asthma- spirometry with reversibility

    Time frame: 6 years

    Comparison of clinical asthma, as assessed by lung function testing, at age 6 years between control and intervention groups. Clinical asthma will be defined as in improvement in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second) of 12% or more following administration of salbutamol inhaler (bronchodilator).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bronchial hyper-responsiveness

    Time frame: Age 6 years

    Comparison of bronchial hyperresponsiveness, as determined by methacholine bronchial allergen challenge, at age 6 years.

  2. Asthma comparison

    Time frame: Age 6 years

    Comparison of asthma, as defined by wheeze plus bronchial hyperreactivity

  3. Airway inflammation level- exhaled nitric oxide measurement

    Time frame: Age 6 years

    Comparison of airway inflammation level, as assessed by exhaled nitric oxide, between placebo and intervention group age 6 years

  4. Cumulative sensitization

    Time frame: Age 6 years

    Comparison of cumulative sensitization to one or more of 6 common allergens, as assessed by skin prick test, up to 6-8 years of age between control and interventions groups.

  5. Cumulative aeroallergen sensitization

    Time frame: Age 6 years

    Comparison of cumulative sensitization to one or more of 6 common aeroallergens, as assessed by skin prick test, up to 6-8 years of age between control and interventions groups.

  6. House dust-mite sensitization

    Time frame: Age 6 years

    Comparison of sensitization to house dust mite, as assessed by skin prick test, at 18 months, 3 years and 6-8 years of age between control and intervention groups.

  7. Clinical atopic disease- parental questionnaire

    Time frame: Age 6 years

    Comparison of clinical allergic diseases/symptoms (atopic eczema, wheeze, allergic rhinitis, food allergy) at 18 months, 3 years and 6 years of age between control and intervention groups. Presence of clinical disease evaluated through parental questionnaires

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Southampton

Other

Collaborators

  • Isle of Wight NHS Trust

Registry information

Official study title

Primary Prevention of Atopy and Asthma With House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy: 6-8 Years Follow up

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2019
First posted
Dec 4, 2018
Registry last updated
Oct 4, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.