Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05332145

MAP to Health Pilot Study: A Physical Activity Intervention for Midlife Adults

The study has two aims: (1) to develop and examine the acceptability of the technological and theoretical frameworks of MAP to Health and (2) to determine whether MAP to Health is related to changes in theoretically identified mechanisms of behavior change (meaning salience, basic psychological needs satisfaction, and internal motivation). In an exploratory aim, the study will assess how the intervention and mechanisms of change are related to changes in physical activity. Participants will be adults in midlife (ages 40-64) who are insufficiently active, are interested in increasing physical activity, do not have contraindications to engaging in physical activity, and are patients in a large healthcare system in the Midwest.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year–64 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

HealthPartners Institute

Bloomington, Minnesota, 55425, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Midlife (ages 40-64 at enrollment)
  • Able to read and understand English
  • Insufficiently active (engaging in ≥10 and ≤90 min of physical activity/week)
  • Intention to increase physical activity in the next 30 days
  • Has consistent access to a phone with text-messaging capability

Exclusion criteria

  • Greater than minimal risk to starting a physical activity program (Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire score > 0)
  • Body Mass Index (BMI)≥ 40
  • Currently pregnant
  • Has opted out of research
  • Diagnosis of metastatic cancer or cardiovascular disease
  • Residing in a nursing home or long-term care facility
  • Cognitive or psychiatric conditions that preclude completion of questionnaires, including dementia diagnosis
  • Diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorder (e.g., Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia)
  • Diagnosis of substance use disorder or AUDIT-C62 >3 for women or >4 for men

Treatment and study plan

MAP to Health

Behavioral

In Phase 1, participants will complete the web-based interview and Aim 1 measures, assessing acceptability and usability of the intervention. The investigators will review whether the intervention appropriately gathers information needed to program theory-based, personalized text messages. After completing the measures, a list of text messages for that participant will be generated and sent to the participant for review. Participants will review the text messages and rate the extent to which the messages are personalized. In Phase 2, the investigators will conduct a proof-of-concept pilot trial in which participants will complete a 4-week pretest monitoring period and an 8-week pilot trial of the intervention, with assessments of Self-Determination Theory mechanisms and meaning salience at pretest (-4 weeks), baseline (0 weeks), midpoint (4 weeks) and posttest (8 weeks). In addition, participants will wear accelerometers to assess physical activity during the 12 weeks.

Primary outcomes

  1. Meaning Salience

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    The Meaning Awareness Scale is a 6-item self-report measure that assesses meaning salience. Participants rate the extent to which they were aware of meaning over the past day (e.g, "I was aware of the meaning in my life" on a 7-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 (rarely) to 7 (very often). Items are averaged for a total score (range, 1-7). Participants complete the scale on three random days during each of the four assessment periods and total scores are averaged across those three days. A higher score signifies greater meaning salience, a better outcome.

  2. Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    The Psychological Needs Satisfaction in Exercise Scale is a self-report measure used to assess participants' satisfaction of three basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) in exercise. The scale has 18 items that participants rate on a 6-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (false) to 6 (true). Items are averaged within each subscale (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) with possible scores ranging from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction of autonomy, competence and relatedness, a better outcome.

  3. Autonomous Motivation

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    • Autonomous motivation was measured using the Behavioral Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire, version 4. The 28-item self-report measure assesses motivations for exercise on the self-determination theory continuum. There are 7 subscales with 4 items each (intrinsic, integrated, identified, introjected - approach, introjected - avoidance, external, and amotivation). Items are summed within each subscale (total score range, 4-28). The subscales were combined using a bifurcation approach, where subscale scores were averaged into two subscales: autonomous (intrinsic, integrated, and identified, total score range 4-28) and controlled motivation (introjected-approach, introjected - avoidance, and external, total score range, 4-28). Higher scores on the autonomous subscale indicate greater internalized motivation, a positive outcome, whereas higher scores on the controlled subscale indicates greater external motivation, a negative outcome.
  4. Technology Acceptance

    Time frame: within 1 week post-intervention

    Participants answered 10 questions rating the extent to which they found the MAP to Health intervention easy to use (4 items) and useful (4-items) and their intentions to use the intervention in the future (2 items). Survey questions were based on previous research and modified for the purposes of this study. Participants rated each item on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Items were averaged within each subscale, with possible total scores ranging from 1-5. A higher score represents greater technology acceptance, a better outcome.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

HealthPartners Institute

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Registry information

Official study title

Development and Proof-of-Concept Trial of a Meaning- and Theory-based Physical Activity Intervention

Acronym: MAP

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Apr 18, 2022
Registry last updated
Dec 6, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.